Unbelievably Biased Captions

14 Comments

1. Lee October 24, 2006

   “Utter stupidity” is more like it. Showing Osama bin Laden, the man the Republicans decided and declared wasn’t important:

   “Well, as I say, we haven’t heard much from him. And I wouldn’t necessarily say he’s at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don’t know where he is. I — I’ll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him. I know he is on the run. I was concerned about him, when he had taken over a country. I was concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and calling the shots for the Taliban.”

   and then showing him as a significant threat because he’s still on the loose, has to be the stupidest moment in this campaign.
2. steak111111 October 24, 2006

   Vote for OBL’s men (and women); Cardin, Stabenow, Klobuchar, McCaskill, Nelson, Menendez, Brown, Casey Jr., Chafee, Ford, Webb, Cantwell, etc…

   If these win, the terrorists win.
3. muirgeo October 24, 2006

   I’m George W Bush and I approve this message…..BOOOO!!!
4. muirgeo October 24, 2006

   SMACKDOWN at Olbermann’s;

   http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Countdown-SC-GOP-Fear1.mov
5. Hugh October 24, 2006

   Biased???

   Can you point out a dishonrst word in the caption?
6. blackflag October 24, 2006

   Damn, the trolls are out in force today!

   Not much happening over at DU fellas?
7. P. Bunyan October 24, 2006

   If you’re a secular socialist like Lee, muirego, Hugh, and most of the French, then yes, I can believe that to you George Bush would be far scarier than Osama Bin Laden.

   Things like freedom, personal resposibility, lifting the poor out of poverty, real constitutional rights (not fabricated ones such as Roe or Kelo), being rewarded for hard work, not being rewarded for being wothless, and the opportunity to be successful are a much greater threat to those on the left than terrorism.
8. Justrand October 24, 2006

   Hugh: “Biased??? Can you point out a dishonest word in the caption?”

   from the caption: (my CAPS)

   “Facing possible DEVASTATION…has turned to UTTER FEAR…”

   Golly, Hugh, considering this was supposedly a news story, don’t ya think those phrases show at least a tiny bit of bias??
9. jhow66 October 24, 2006

   To “mun-go”(linkman)- if you watch ex espn sportcaster that tells all we need to know about you.
10. Mitchell October 24, 2006

    Lee, Mungo, Hugh support the French!! Who woulda thunk it, huh??

    Bunch of morons think Olbermann is the second coming. Well, it tells you something, doesn’t it, the “authorities” they reference.

    Edward R. Numbnuts.
11. JimK October 24, 2006

    Biased? Yes. True? Also yes. The RNC have been using almost nothing BUT fear to try to win votes from those of us who are getting fed up with our party.

    Is this even up for debate? It’s blatantly obvious to everyone, isn’t it? I thought the debate was whether using fear tactics was viable or not, I never even considered that some Republicans were so drunk on Kool Aid that they would deny the fact that fear tactics were being used at all.
12. 914 October 24, 2006

    JimK is for Kool-aid

    Your right about the fear thing. I vote republican in this election over the fear of what will happen to this country and My children if the Euro democrat liberals ascend to power again..
13. Steve of Norway October 24, 2006

    The more I hear the “kool-aid” meme from “right-thinkers”, the more they don’t get what’s going on in the world.

    Go for vote for your liberaltarian candidate then Jim. I know another Lee wishes he did in 2000. Since everyone knows the LP has what it takes to handle national security…which is to blame the U.S. first.
14. nogo postal October 25, 2006

    I just think it is strange that the RNC would front the biggest failue of this Administration…you know..getting OBL…