Continuing my point that I started here.
A note to the left half of the blogosphere. If your intent is to advance your party’s agenda –and I assume that is what you are trying to do– here is a hint.
If you want to make the case that yours is the tolerant party and the Republicans are intolerant, spending a week in a gay bashing free for all probably is not the best way to make the point.
Fell free to ignore this. I hope you do, really, but I just figured I’d offer you a friendly bit of advice that won’t cost you a penny. If you guys think bashing this guy because he is gay will further your political agenda then my all means, continue.
If you want to make the case the the Whitehouse should ban gay people from the media then you just get right out there and make your case to the American people. Say it loud and say it proud. “NO GAY PEOPLE IN THE WHITEHOUSE.”
But do me a favor… When you lose the next election, don’t tell me it is the American people who are idiots.
UPDATE: Rightwingnuthouse takes apart the “He wasn’t a real journalist” canard– follow his trackback.
You’ve been played – again!
He didn’t say it was “easily accessible” to him, let alone accessible to him at all. Gannon statements appear intentionally vague. The same people who point to his ambiguous phrasing and call it a smoking gun, also accuse him of lying about everything else. It’s pick and choose. Print phrases and not the entire interview. Ignore the fact that the FBI never laid a supeona on him.
You call him a poseur, a big lying fraud about his entire life, yet you want some ambiguous phrase he utters to be viewed as evidence of some sort of nefarious plot. You say believe this — but everything else is a lie!
Dance!
At first I thought Gannon was worth investigating for the Plame deal and possibly closer relationship with the WH than is apparent, but the sex crap has made it all very distasteful. However, I do like how -S- reveals his attitudes towards gays with comments like this:
that “whore” aspect to the homosexual community, particularly among males, is more common than not.
and this:
I’m just saying that Gannon’s supposed homosexual escort behavior, deemed to be representational by liberals as “a whore,” is more common than not among male homosexuals,
Ah, yes. More gay people prostitute themselves than do not. I think it’s safe to assume -S- doesn’t know many gay people.
– The salivating pack of yapping dogs on the asshat left “NEED” every controversy concerning conservatives they can “Find, fabricate, hullicinate” desperately… You probably would too if you were on such a roll of losing propositions as they are….
– At this point they’ve thrown all caution to the winds and will use any tactic they can to attack…. Most be an awful feeling to no you’re a loser in a losing battle….
– Personally it looks like whats really got their panties in a bunch over Gannon is the fact that he was taking up a seat at the press gaggles that a good fair and balanced ravenously partisan liberal “journalist” could have been occupying so that the usual lefty meme’s concerning WMD’s could be asked for the 10,000 time….
– Ok… We really do know the leftturd peacniks are scared shitless of being drafted…. We get it already. Maybe if we just give all the liberal cowards a “draft avoidence” card they’d shut up already…..
Read this
“Pay no attention to the naked gay conservative male prostitute sitting in the middle of the family values White House living room”
We have a man whose biggest cheers on the campaign trail in 2000 were when he would solemnly swear that he would “bring honor and integrity back to the White House” — and everybody knew very well that he was talking about fellatio in the oval office. After his recent reelection in 2004, stories abounded about how the issues of moral values, the impact of evangelical Christians and, most importantly, the movement to allow gays to marry had tipped the balance in what was a very close election. Now we find out that a conservative gay male prostitute was given highly unusual access to that same family values white house. There isn’t a story there?
– In the same vein that theres a “story” in the fact that liberal journalists outnumber conservatives 4 to 1 on the major US newspaper staffs…. Yes a story but hardly front page 60 pt font news… On the other hand if Gannon is implicated in the Plame leak that would be a horse of a different color…. but even before you get to him why isn’t Movak being subpeonied…. thats an even bigger question….
– Novak that is….
Pay no attention to the naked gay conservative male prostitute sitting in the middle of the family values White House living room”
Hallucinating again? Admit, it. You’re hot for Cannon.
We have a man whose biggest cheers on the campaign trail in 2000 were when he would solemnly swear that he would “bring honor and integrity back to the White House” —
And he did.
and everybody knew very well that he was talking about fellatio in the oval office.
It was a start.
After his recent reelection in 2004, stories abounded about how the issues of moral values, the impact of evangelical Christians and, most importantly, the movement to allow gays to marry had tipped the balance in what was a very close election.
Stories abounded by the left because they thought they could use it to disparage the people who voted for Bush. In a questionnaire that was meant to skew, ie, single issues vs. a question that covers multiple issues, moral values received 22%. And no, it was not a close election. Even with the media on your side, a fat cat like Soros, the Hollywood idiots, and that pig Moore, you still lost.
Now we find out that a conservative gay male prostitute was given highly unusual access to that same family values white house. There isn’t a story there?
He attended some press briefings. Story? Yeah, how once again the left will lie and misrepresent anything.
LOL, this may be the most ludicrous post yet…Julie wins the prize.
Returning integrity to the White House. Hmm…let’s see about that, he never really won the election the first time, started a war that was based on complete lies and fabrications, allowed his subordinates to allow American soldiers to torture prisoners of war. Ya that is returning the integrity of the office.
you people should start your own talk show or something, your totally inane and divorced from reality. Julie’s post proves it.
I had a pithy response for you, but I’ve changed my mind. Who am I to talk you out of your many delusions? It must be frustrating to be you, Bill — always a loser, people laughing at you, refusing to take you and your b.s. seriously. But, hey! I really don’t give a shit!
p.s. – Gannon who? Haaaaaaaaaaaaa!