The global warming house of cards is on the verge of collapse

So much for peer review:


SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.

The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building.

The admission follows the leaking of a thousand private emails sent and received by Professor Phil Jones, the CRU’s director. In them he discusses thwarting climate sceptics seeking access to such data.

In a statement on its website, the CRU said: “We do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (quality controlled and homogenised) data.”

Homogenised data eh? provides the definition for those wondering:

to make uniform or similar, as in composition or function

In other words, homogenised to tell a story that otherwise isn’t there.

It’s time for investigations… it’s time to follow the money… it’s time for the inconvenient truth to smack the likes of Al Gore upside his fat head.

It’s past time.


A Personal Perspective on Health Care
Let's Play Rewrite the Headline #2