There are no words, when something like this is considered art:
Art major Aliza Shvarts ’08 wants to make a statement.
Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts (pictured) will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.
The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts’ project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.
But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for “shock value.”
“I hope it inspires some sort of discourse,” Shvarts said. “Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it’s not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone.”
The “fabricators,” or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.
OK, well, the “there are no words” thing is false. There ARE words.
This is disgusting, this is vile, and I cannot believe that Yale would approve this kind of thing.
Actually, well, yes, I can believe it, but it saddens me. A lot. What is happening on these college campuses? Students seem to pretty much have free reign to do whatever they feel like doing, and there sure won’t be any faculty or staff to stop them — unless, of course, it’s involving a conservative viewpoint. As long as it fits into the liberal agenda, then students can do anything, no matter how depraved.
And I have to wonder how this girl’s parents feel about this. They couldn’t possibly be proud, could they? I mean, what would they say? “Oh, gee, well, we’re so happy that our little girl is endangering her health and sanity by giving herself multiple abortions without seeing a doctor first, and then putting her blood and the videos of her home abortions on display at school. She’s just so smart, we’re so proud!”
Was this girl also not concerned about her health at all? Well, that’s a stupid question — apparently not, because if she was, she would have seen a damn doctor.
Is the story about the sperm donors strange to anyone but me? I mean… so, she was “artificially inseminated”, but they weren’t paid for their “donation”. How, exactly, did she go about acquiring it? Something seems a little off there, but maybe I’m just reading too much into it.
In any case, this is easily the most awful story I’m going to write about today — probably this week. Yale shouldn’t be allowing this to go on. Yes, this girl has freedom of speech like all the rest of us, but no one is required to go out of their way to support that — they just can’t hinder it. The university has every right to tell her they don’t want this disgusting display on their campus, but we all know they won’t.
That something like this is allowed to go on — and is considered art, no less — is a sad indicator of what our society is like today.
Hat Tip: Gateway Pundit
Update: Yale officials confirm that the art project is a hoax. The act of committing the hoax was the project…