Well, I finally found one. It will be a great cause for celebration among my moonbat commenters but I finally found a lunatic on the right.. Or that’s why I assume. His behavior is so bizarre, there are only two conclusions.
1) It is loony.
2) He is completely rational and it picking a fight hoping for a Wizbanging.
From his pathetic stats, this might be the case.*** Whatever the case I’ll link the insanity if for no other reason then to get him to quit whining.
I won’t smack down his every point– my time is far too valuable for that. I’ll just give you 2 examples.
Wizbang links an article from, of all places, the Duluth News Tribune dated January 26 to supposedly make the point that the Times was wrong.
The goofball could not bother read it to see that it was a New York Times story re-run in another paper. What a mental heavyweight.
He also whines that I am conservative. (odd considering he claims to be one)
Wizbang’s slandering [BTW If it is written it is libel -ED] the Times to draw in conservative readers is the very same game, only worse, and without any original reporting or quoted sources. … But it can not be done with the conservative blogging community’s own brand of bad reporting and unfounded smear.
In one sentence of my reply I say:
So, I’ve read your rant, it made no sense and you were demonstrably clueless. Now if you have a point, I’ll entertain it, but so far all I’ve heard you do is whine because I’m conservative.
To which brain-damaged boy replied:
Not to mention being cast as a “whiny liberal” in comments here by Paul, when nothing could be further from the truth.
The quotation marks were his even though that is not what I said.
[Kevin adds] I’ve actually address the issues raised in Dan’s original post here. Those of you quick to rush to Dan’s defense might be a little surprised at the tone he adopts in e-mails I publish. He was trying to goad us into a fight that we really weren’t looking to get into. Several e-mails and posts later he finally succeed…
** [Kevin again] The moment I read this I knew what the response would be. Sarcasm so doesn’t translate to blogs. I’ve left it in strikeout for continuity sake, but it’s not a reflection of my beliefs and it’s still MY site. If you read my post you will see, however, that this fight was clearly picked by Dan and he became belligerent when we wouldn’t respond to his satisfaction…