“It’s not nice to fool Mother Nature.” That saying (trademarked by Anderson, Clayton and Company) was the catchphrase for Chiffon Margarine back in the 1970s. An updated version of that saying should be, “It’s not nice to discredit Mother Nature.”
Discrediting Mother Nature is just what climate alarmists do when they act as if climate change were caused solely by human activity. Climate alarmists proclaim, “We must fight climate change,” as if they could fight all causes of climate change. Well, to the climate alarmists, I say . . .
Consider the following statement by Israeli astrophysicist Dr. Nir Shaviv, Professor at the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem:
It will be interesting to see how climate alarmists are going to fight changes in solar activity.
Then there is this report from Ohio State University: “A study of a Lake Erie wetland suggests that scientists have vastly underestimated the number of places methane-producing microbes can survive — and, as a result, today’s global climate models may be misjudging the amount of methane being released into the atmosphere.”
Who are climate alarmists gonna call to fight methane-producing microbes? Not these people:
Add to the above this report from the University of Minnesota: “New findings by researchers from the University of Minnesota College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences (CFANS), who partnered with scientists from across the world, suggest plant respiration is a larger source of carbon emissions than previously thought, and warn that as the world warms, this may reduce the ability of Earth’s land surface to absorb emissions due to fossil fuel burning.”
The University of Minnesota report quotes Research Associate Ming Chen as saying, “The implications of this study are enormous. The fact that plant respiration is likely 30 percent higher than previous estimates should warn all global modelers that an updated inspection is warranted regarding how we model carbon flows in and out of terrestrial ecosystems globally.”
Just how are climate alarmists going to fight plant respiration? Inquiring minds want to know.
A December 2015 report from Louisiana State University provides climate alarmists with another challenge. That report is titled Earth’s tilt influences climate change. That report is akin to an August 2013 report from the University of Washington titled Earth orbit changes were key to Antarctic warming that ended last ice age. Both reports describe how the Earth’s wobble created climate change long before humans did anything to release carbon into the atmosphere. Now, just how are climate alarmists going to prevent the Earth from wobbling on its axis?
If climate alarmists can stop the Earth from wobbling, then perhaps they can also eliminate all volcanoes on planet Earth, starting with Mount Agung on the island of Bali. Here is an excerpt from How does the climate change naturally? (from the website of Australia’s Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences):
In his 02/02/16 testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space & Technology, climatologist Dr. John R. Christy states, “A critical scientific goal in our era is to determine whether emissions from human activities impact the climate and if so by how much. This is made especially difficult because we know the climate system already is subject to significant changes without the influence of humans.”
If climate alarmists just want to minimize carbon emissions from human activity without causing economies to collapse, then I see no problem with them doing so. However, if their goal is to put an end to climate change, then they are wanting to stop Mother Nature from being Mother Nature. That might make her angry. Don’t make Mother Nature angry. You wouldn’t like her when she’s angry.
(Featured Image in Public Domain. Via Wikimedia Commons.)