Supreme Court to Review Executive Amnesty

They will also consider the question of wether B. Hussein Obama has failed to uphold his oath of office by failing to

Supreme Court to rule on Obama immigration orders

By Josh Gerstein, Politico

The justices also added a question on whether Obama’s action violated the Constitutional provision that he ‘take care that the Laws be faithfully executed.’

The Supreme Court announced Tuesday that it will take up a case challenging the legality of President Barack Obama’s executive actions aimed at granting quasi-legal status and work permits to up to five million people who entered the U.S. illegally as children or who have children who are American citizens.

The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to entertain four legal questions raised by Obama’s immigration action.

Three of the questions were laid out by the Justice Department in the petition asking the justices to take up the case: whether states create legal standing to challenge the deferred actions grants by providing benefits to such immigrants, whether the actions Obama ordered in 2014 were arbitrary and capricious under federal law, and whether the administration was obliged to go through a formal notice-and-comment period before proceeding with its plan.

The fourth question, added by the justices in their Tuesday order, is whether Obama’s actions violated the Constitutional provision requiring him to “take care that the Laws be faithfully executed”—in essence, whether existing law bars the president from making the kinds of enforcement changes he sought to make.

About bloody time.

Now we will see what the price of failing to uphold one’s oath of office is.


IG: Highly Classified Emails on Clinton's Server