Nasty Politics

The word “nasty” was first used somewhere around 1400 CE, probably derived from the Old French word nastre which meant something bad and strange. But when used in conjunction with politics, the word ‘nasty’ puts me in mind of the political cartoonist Thomas Nast. Nast was the most famous cartoonist of the 19th Century, and is commonly regarded as the man who affixed to the Republican and Democratic political parties their mascot animals of elephant and donkey, respectively. Nast built his reputation and success on political attacks in his cartoons. His most common theme was to cast a well-known politician as a crook or predatory animal. That’s not to say that many of Nast’s targets were not the villains he cast, but Nast’s cartoons were effective partly because there was no forum for debate, no available recourse for the target – if the public believed the cartoon, you were toast. While many political historians lionize Nast, it should be remembered that he introduced a new dimension to character assassination, legitimizing the caricature of people as inhuman monsters in order to persuade his audience, without any sort of debate on the facts or evidence. In many ways, the rants of Michael Moore and Keith Olbermann simply carry on the tradition of Thomas Nast, the petty venom of Peggy Noonan and George Will carry on the same behavior of an earlier flame-thrower from their party (Nast was an important player in Lincoln’s 1864 re-election, and he was particularly savage in his malignment of George McLelland).

To some degree, such artists of malice are an evil we must endure; the same protection of freedom which allows one idiot to dress up as Hitler and stomp down a street on the one hand, allows David Letterman to prove himself a moronic misogynist and thug on a nightly basis on the other. But a line has been crossed when elected officials act in such manner. Without naming names, it is sadly obvious that the political world has degenerated to such a condition. We now have the closest thing to one-party rule with deliberate public disparagement of all disagreement for the first time in two generations. And as long as the public puts up with such behavior, it will remain the new standard, or become even fouler.

The President's Pottery Barn Economy
Weekend Caption Contest™ Winners

46 Comments

  1. hgg July 13, 2009
  2. Second to Nun July 13, 2009
  3. Mac Lorry July 13, 2009
  4. steve sturm July 13, 2009
  5. WildWillie July 13, 2009
  6. James H July 13, 2009
  7. Justrand July 13, 2009
  8. bobdog July 13, 2009
  9. steve sturm July 13, 2009
  10. apb July 13, 2009
  11. sam July 13, 2009
  12. retired military July 13, 2009
  13. retired military July 13, 2009
  14. jmc July 13, 2009
  15. DJ Drummond July 13, 2009
  16. max July 13, 2009
  17. DJ Drummond July 13, 2009
  18. Second to Nun July 13, 2009
  19. jmc July 13, 2009
  20. DJ Drummond July 13, 2009
  21. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  22. jmc July 13, 2009
  23. max July 13, 2009
  24. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  25. jmc July 13, 2009
  26. DJ Drummond July 13, 2009
  27. jmc July 13, 2009
  28. DJ Drummond July 13, 2009
  29. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  30. jmc July 13, 2009
  31. DJ Drummond July 13, 2009
  32. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  33. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  34. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  35. retired military July 13, 2009
  36. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  37. retired military July 13, 2009
  38. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  39. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  40. DJ Drummond July 13, 2009
  41. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  42. DJ Drummond July 13, 2009
  43. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  44. retired military July 13, 2009
  45. LaMedusa July 13, 2009
  46. LaMedusa July 13, 2009