In all I’ve seen and read on the present global warming hoax, this is -beyond any doubt- the best story I’ve ever read. It’s an instant classic that shows not only what an absolute fraud the whole thing is but it exposes the hucksters who call themselves scientists. — Of course they don’t realize they just outed themselves.
Natural weather variations have offset the effects of global warming for the past couple of years and will continue to keep temperatures flat through 2008, a study released Thursday said.
But global warming will begin in earnest in 2009…
Oh come now…. global warming has been “delayed” for two years but it will be here “in earnest” in 2009? Who writes this stuff?
Then what about all the things they have already blamed on global warming?
What about the children with fever? We where told “the science was in” and the children where getting sick because of global warming. But if “natural forces” offset global warming why did the children get sick? (follow that link BTW it’s hysterical)
But this story has only started giving…. So how did the “scientists” figure this out?
Existing global climate computer models tend to underestimate the effects of natural forces on climate change, so for this analysis, Met Office experts tweaked their model to better reflect the impact of weather systems such as La Nina, or fluctuations in ocean heat and circulation.
Instead of using approximations, they used real data on the state of the ocean and the atmosphere to generate forecasts of climate change for the decade beginning in 2005 and running through 2014.
Game. Set. Match. The global warming hucksters just admitted the whole thing is a scam.
The models could not predict the climate 2 years in the future so they had to be “tweaked” when the real data came in. 2 years. Al Gore has told us these models where good for 300 years! But they have been proven to be flawed after only 2 years.
And this story proves another of my points on global warming; it is based largely on man’s hubris. “Existing global climate computer models tend to underestimate the effects of natural forces” How much more damning can that get? The modelers all think man has a bigger factor on the climate than nature itself. Hubris, friends, hubris.
But wait, it gets better:
The projections suggested [suggested? -ED] that while man-made greenhouse gases would raise temperatures over the long run, cooler water in the tropical Pacific and a resistance to warming in the Southern Ocean would counteract the effect of global warming in the early years of the decade.
The findings fit with the weather patterns seen so far…
Well I hope to hell they did! They had the real data in front of them, if they couldn’t write a computer model to give them an answer they already knew, they’d need to hire new programmers.
Think about what this joker is saying… If we give the programmers the answer first, they can write a computer model to explain it. All that proves is that the programmers can do math.
It should be no surprise the models are flawed. I already blogged the fact ALL 18 models failed to model THE PAST and were off by a factor of 300%.
But what this story really shows is how UNscientific this whole scam is. Global warming was not “offset.” It did not occur. The only way these “scientists” can say that Global warming was “offset” by natural forces is to presume they knew what the temps should have been.
In other words, this is the opposite of science. They are starting with a conclusion then when they don’t get it, they say the experiment must have been flawed.
If there where any intellectual honesty in this debate, the people who have developed these models wouldn’t be telling us that global warming was “offset.” They would be telling us that the models as they exist today are systemically flawed and can’t even predict the past.
They’ve admitted it in this article, just not in those words.
Anyone who still believes in Global Warming isn’t talking science, they’re talking religion.