Note to the Guardian: George W. Bush wasn’t President in 1998

Does anyone actually take this publication seriously? This is what the Guardian reported:

MI6 believed it was close to finding the al-Qaida leader in Afghanistan in 1998, and again the next year. The plan was for MI6 to hand the CIA vital information about Bin Laden. Ministers including Robin Cook, the then foreign secretary, gave their approval on condition that the CIA gave assurances he would be treated humanely. The plot is revealed in a 75-page report by parliament’s intelligence and security committee on rendition, the practice of flying detainees to places where they may be tortured.

The report criticises the Bush administration’s approval of practices which would be illegal if carried out by British agents. It shows that in 1998, the year Bin Laden was indicted in the US, Britain insisted that the policy of treating prisoners humanely should include him. But the CIA never gave the assurances.

It’s Clinton’s CIA that refuses to assure British officials that Bin Laden won’t be tortured, but the Guardian blames the Bush Administration. Did the Guardian’s editors think no one would notice?

Last Week's Weekend Caption Contest™ Winners
Holy Crap