The Washington Times Will Ask for Dennis Hastert's Resignation

***Updated***

Scroll down for updates

Drudge has the scoop:

WASHINGTON TIMES ON TUESDAY WILL CALL FOR SPEAKER HASTERT’S RESIGNATION, NEWSROOM SOURCES TELL DRUDGE… DEVELOPING… Editorial titled: ‘Resign, Mr. Speaker’: ‘House Speaker Dennis Hastert must do the only right thing, and resign his speakership at once… Mr. Hastert has forfeited the confidence of the public and his party, http://wizbangblog.com/mt-static/images/formatting-icons/bold.gif
Boldand he cannot preside over the necessary coming investigation, an investigation that must examine his own inept performance’… — Washington Times, October 3, 2006…

Mark Foley is filth. He’s even more pathetic by trying to hide behind his “I’m an alcoholic” excuse.

For additional information be sure to read Lorie’s post from earlier today.

Update: The Democrats are using Foley’s sick behavior to accuse the entire Republican Party:

1. Pay no heed to the distinction between the e-mails and IMs. There’s no evidence (yet) that any Republican leaders knew about Foley’s cybersex IMs. There’s plenty of evidence that they knew how uncomfortable the “overly friendly” e-mails made at least one page. So the Dems will press the GOP on what they knew about the former and will constantly, in their press releases, refer to the “GOP’s knowledge of the sexually explicit e-mails.”

Did we expect anything different from these folks?

Update: The Washington Times editorial is up. Two important paragraphs:

Now the scandal must unfold on the front pages of the newspapers and on the television screens, as transcripts of lewd messages emerge and doubts are rightly raised about the forthrightness of the Republican stewards of the 109th Congress. Some Democrats are attempting to make this “a Republican scandal,” and they shouldn’t; Democrats have contributed more than their share of characters in the tawdry history of congressional sexual scandals. Sexual predators come in all shapes, sizes and partisan hues, in institutions within and without government. When predators are found they must be dealt with, forcefully and swiftly. This time the offender is a Republican, and Republicans can’t simply “get ahead” of the scandal by competing to make the most noise in calls for a full investigation. The time for that is long past.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert must do the only right thing, and resign his speakership at once. Either he was grossly negligent for not taking the red flags fully into account and ordering a swift investigation, for not even remembering the order of events leading up to last week’s revelations — or he deliberately looked the other way in hopes that a brewing scandal would simply blow away. He gave phony answers Friday to the old and ever-relevant questions of what did he know and when did he know it? Mr. Hastert has forfeited the confidence of the public and his party, and he cannot preside over the necessary coming investigation, an investigation that must examine his own inept performance.

Update II: Another former page is disputing that pages were “warned” to stay away from Rep. Foley, an accusation by Matthew Loraditch that really fueled the fire of this story:

But another page, who asked not to be named told The Palm Beach Post, “The program in no official capacity warned us about it,” and he said that Loraditch had posted an explanation for his comments to ABC on the college social network, Facebook.com.

[snip]

The other page said most pages are angry at Loraditch’s comments and that the page program did its best to ensure the safety of pages, with strict rules and curfews.

Matthew Loraditch is now backtracking on his statements:

“Firstly, as to the ABC “Warned” story, while I may have inadvertently used the word, “warned,” in communication, I can assure you it was not intended. The fact of the matter is in an informal situation a supervisor mentioned that Foley was a bit odd or flaky and did not connote by tone or otherwise that he should be avoided

[snip]

“Thirdly, I have stressed several key points in my contact with media that all situations with Mr. Foley occurred after we had finished our service as pages. That if anything had happed while we were in Washington, it would have been dealt with. That I have full faith and trust that any of the supervisors and staff we worked with would have properly dealt with any situation like the current one. That the page program is one of the most wonderful and educational experiences a youth can have.

Update III: The Wall Street Journal’s Opinion Journal takes this story into a whole new direction, which means it may get a lot uglier:

In our admittedly traditional view, [Foley’s explicit email exchange] was odd and suspect behavior, especially because Mr. Foley was well known as a homosexual even if he declined to publicly acknowledge it. And Mr. Hastert was informed that fellow Illinois Republican John Shimkus–who oversees the page program as part of a six-member board–spoke privately with Mr. Foley, who explained that the email was innocent.

What next was Mr. Hastert supposed to do with an elected Congressman? Assume that Mr. Foley was a potential sexual predator and bar him from having any private communication with pages? Refer him to the Ethics Committee? In retrospect, barring contact with pages would have been wise.

But in today’s politically correct culture, it’s easy to understand how senior Republicans might well have decided they had no grounds to doubt Mr. Foley merely because he was gay and a little too friendly in emails. Some of those liberals now shouting the loudest for Mr. Hastert’s head are the same voices who tell us that the larger society must be tolerant of private lifestyle choices, and certainly must never leap to conclusions about gay men and young boys. Are these Democratic critics of Mr. Hastert saying that they now have more sympathy for the Boy Scouts’ decision to ban gay scoutmasters? Where’s Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on that one?

As I said, this is going to get a lot uglier very quickly.

Update IV: Mark Levin is not at all happy with the Washington Times’ editorial asking for Speaker Hastert’s resignation. See here and here.

Update V: Hugh Hewitt responds to the Washington Times editorial with his post Don’t Resign, Speaker Hastert. Swing Back.

What a peace of work
Wizbang Podcast #40 is up

50 Comments

  1. physics geek October 2, 2006
  2. George October 2, 2006
  3. jhow66 October 2, 2006
  4. jp October 2, 2006
  5. BarneyG2000 October 2, 2006
  6. smartguy October 2, 2006
  7. kirktoe October 2, 2006
  8. mantis October 2, 2006
  9. Mitchell October 2, 2006
  10. Steve of Norway October 2, 2006
  11. FireRescue October 2, 2006
  12. GeminiChuck October 3, 2006
  13. Lee October 3, 2006
  14. muirgeo October 3, 2006
  15. bill October 3, 2006
  16. Whats the difference? October 3, 2006
  17. Buckeye October 3, 2006
  18. Buckeye October 3, 2006
  19. USMC Pilot October 3, 2006
  20. Hugh October 3, 2006
  21. Jack Oneil October 3, 2006
  22. Mike October 3, 2006
  23. Mike October 3, 2006
  24. Lee October 3, 2006
  25. SilverBubble October 3, 2006
  26. Mitchell October 3, 2006
  27. Hugh October 3, 2006
  28. Lee October 3, 2006
  29. Mitchell October 3, 2006
  30. Scrapiron October 3, 2006
  31. Lee October 3, 2006
  32. 914 October 3, 2006
  33. Mitchell October 3, 2006
  34. Heralder October 3, 2006
  35. scsiwuzzy October 3, 2006
  36. Mitchell October 3, 2006
  37. Mitchell October 3, 2006
  38. Mitchell October 3, 2006
  39. millco88 October 3, 2006
  40. nogo postal October 3, 2006
  41. Lee October 3, 2006
  42. Mitchell October 3, 2006
  43. 914 October 3, 2006
  44. Heralder October 3, 2006
  45. Mitchell October 3, 2006
  46. Mitchell October 3, 2006
  47. Heralder October 4, 2006
  48. Mitchell October 4, 2006
  49. hermie October 4, 2006
  50. j October 4, 2006