I still can’t believe this guy was president for eight years. It is amazing that a majority of the American people would elect this guy twice. (Oops, forgot — they didn’t.) If you haven’t seen the video of Bill Clinton’s meltdown yet, check it out now.
Update; One thing that you can say about Bill Clinton is that he is consistent. The first press conference he held after becoming President was striking to me in that he spent an incredible amount of time blaming the evil Republicans for everything. At the time I thought he sounded so unlike any other president in my lifetime and I just knew he would not be successful by blaming others rather than taking responsibility for his own actions (or inaction). I was wrong because he did enjoy success in the opinion polls by bashing his opponents. (A big dot com bubble that boosted the economic outlook didn’t hurt either.)
I was right too though, partially at least, because he never did really win over those on the other side of the aisle, at least not at the ballot box. Listen to any of Clinton’s speeches or interviews and you will hear at least some form of blame being placed on his opponents. Like I said, he is consistent.
He took them simply because he was being lazy and stupid and not to cover something up. So IT IS A LIE to say he DESTROYED documents. GOT IT!!!
————————————————-
So you basically said that Clinton appointed a lazy and stupid man to be his NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR. In other words, you admitted that Clinton was stupid for choosing Sandy Berger. That ‘s why he was so lousy about national security issue, esp terrorism. OK, all your previous talking points about how good clinton was wrt terrorism was simply spouting our incoherent talking points.
“1835 days since Bush swore he wouldn’t rest until he got bin Laden…”
No wonder he keeps f#@^&*g up he needs some sleep!
May god bless George Bush huh? Soooo your god doesn’t bless me, or Hugh,or muirgeo? Oh that’s right, god is a republican. Hey,does karl rove & frat boy have a personal line to the big guy. I mean, after all, they have sent quite alot of people to meet him.
BTW,your frat boy leader was declared a winner of an election by people his daddy gave jobs to. -How is that for irony?-So for Low-rie Bye-rd to make an issue of Clinton not getting 50% of the vote, is kind of like a crack dealer calling a whore a law breaker.
BTW, who is stupid here for believing that Sandy Berger was not trying to cover up for Bill Clinton? Esp after all the rant against Bush.
Liberalism is bad for your thinking, it really is.
5 years and the liberals still haven’t changed their appeasement and terrorist enabling way.
30 years and the liberals still haven’t apologized for their complicity in the murder of millions of people by the communists.
If you don’t like Multination Corps, then please do move to the Peoples Republic of __________ whatever. They get rid of them at the stroke of a pen, along with the rest of their economies.
You sir are a fucking idiot. Sorry, but you really, really are. Just listen to yourself.
You are the political equivalent of Clay Aiken.
Posted by: Mitchell
Dude moving to any other country doesn’t protect you from MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS you ding dong.
You guys are so afraid of One World Government and the United Nations and instead you’re gonna get One World Corporate Rule ya dope azz.
the most damning thing for Clinton’s legacy is the 1993 attack on the WTC right after he took office and his view of it. Ramsey Yousef came to America with an Iraqi Passport and bombed the WTC on the 2nd anniversary of the liberation of Kuwait from Iraq/saddam!!!! his uncle, khalid sheik mohammed of course is the 9/11 mastermind
Dude moving to any other country doesn’t protect you from MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS you ding dong.
————————————————
Again here are the countries that are supposedly free of the multinational corporations: Cuba, North Korea, and Iran for example. They are against capitalism with multinational corporations and practice the statist economics for the sake of the people. These are exactly your utopia.
It would appear the Clinnochio is back!
Muerigo,
You guys are so afraid of One World Government and the United Nations
———————————————–
So you like United Nations? Yup they are so good for the poor that they are deeply involved in the oil-for-food corruption to keep Saddam in power so that he can have real torture and rape. The Human Rights Commission is a den of thuggish dictators like Mugabe (of Sudan), Syria etc… I don’t know whether you know about the congo sexual abuse of refugees by UN troops. What have the UN done for the poor people of Sudan?
What was George Bush doing about Bin Laden prior to 9-11?
…enemy and true to the history of what grace does to the godless, it drives them nutts
Posted by: jjp
Dude we’re ALL godless…you’re just to week and needy to admit it.
Oh and no Santa either…sorry to ruin your week end but truth is important for a rational perspective on the REAL world.
No god dude. Just think back to one year before you were born, then think back 100 years or 1 million years before that…that’s your eternity when you die. It’s not that bad….now lets focus on the here and now instead of planning for the nothingness.
LoveAmerica Imm: we need more like you.
You are a better American than many who were born here! I assume because you didn’t grow to take it for granted like these lazy, privileged bastards, mungo, et al.
My wife is an immigrant from Latin Am. She marvels at the stupidity of those on the Left in this country who would not, for one second, stand for the kind of stuff they expect the “3rd world” to put up with.
It used to be that the Left/Dems. feigned interest in the “little people” in Lat Am and other hard places. But they betrayed their true lack of interest in anyone beside themselves when we tried to free Afghans and Iraqis.
Same for their love fest with Chavez. The man is a dictator, and no one, NO ONE, would enjoy living in his impoverished country. More impoverished now than when he took over in 1998, and since oil has goine from $20 to recently $80 a barrel.
Lefties never did understand economics. Don’t trust them with that, or something serious like liberating oppressed people. They would say, Darfur, Smarfur, let someone else worry with it.
We’re with France and Russia–it’s just too hard and dirty.
I am so glad I don’t exist in their petty, afraid, small little world.
What was George Bush doing about Bin Laden prior to 9-11?
———————————————–
He was trying to put together his admistration after a long delay by AlGore’s contest and put together a plan to take care of AlQ. What did Bill Clinton do after the 1993 WTC attack, the Khobar tower, the embassy attack, the Yemen attack etc …?
—————————————
Again here are the countries that are supposedly free of the multinational corporations: Cuba, North Korea, and Iran for example. They are against capitalism with multinational corporations and practice the statist economics for the sake of the people. These are exactly your utopia.
Posted by: LoveAmerica Immigran
I didn’t say I supported communism. I support democracy. What do you put first Capitalism or Democracy? Answer that. It’s a straight forward question.
Muiergo seems to be trying to post jibberish to distract attentio.
So you like United Nations? Yup they are so good for the poor that they are deeply involved in the oil-for-food corruption to keep Saddam in power so that he can have real torture and rape. The Human Rights Commission is a den of thuggish dictators like Mugabe (of Sudan), Syria etc… I don’t know whether you know about the congo sexual abuse of refugees by UN troops. What have the UN done for the poor people of Sudan?
Posted by: LoveAmerica Immigrant
Absolutely I like the United Nations. Its not perfect but with good leadership it can be better and it has done loads of good things since its inception.
Now there used to be The League of Nations, but a certain country thought it was TOO GOOD for the League of Nations and left it to attack France instead.
I didn’t say I supported communism. I support democracy. What do you put first Capitalism or Democracy? Answer that. It’s a straight forward question.
————————————————
You said you don’t want MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS. So i simply follow the logic of your arg: I provide you with the list of countries that are free of MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS.
Next time, make sure you think through your args before posting.
Mitchell,
thanks. I marvel at the people who can believe that the modern Dem party is a party of the people. Just like the people who believe that the communists care about the poor.
What was George Bush doing about Bin Laden prior to 9-11?
———————————————–
He was trying to put together his admistration after a long delay by AlGore’s contest and put together a plan to take care of AlQ. What did Bill Clinton do after the 1993 WTC attack, the Khobar tower, the embassy attack, the Yemen attack etc …?
Posted by: LoveAmerica Immigrant
You are wrong Bush did nothing to address the Al queda threat up until 7 minutes after the second plane hit the world trade centers.
Actually here is some stuff Bush did related to Al qeueda
http://www.questionsquestions.net/bushladen/bushladen_chart.htm
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blbushabdullahhands.htm
Here’s what Clinton did:
http://www.cdt.org/security/usapatriot/19950427clinton.html
Absolutely I like the United Nations. Its not perfect but with good leadership it can be better and it has done loads of good things since its inception.
————————————————
Using your own standard, if you can put up with all the craps the UN has done. Then America under Bush is much better than the UN for sure!
Looks at the fact: Europe is willing to sell out the poor Iraquis for Saddam ‘s oil. UN is simply a den of thuggish dictators. Russia, China, France were willing to sell out the poor for oil-for-food bribes.
I didn’t know that your standard was so low that can support such a corrupt and ineffective institution like the UN. So all your rant about Bush is again fact-free talking points. Bush adm is far more competent and caring about the poor/oppressed people in the world.
Muergio,
All your posts are simply wrong. Bush was in office barely 8 months and Condi Rice talked about Alq way before that. You should learn by now that the left doesn’t care about the truth and the facts as I have shown you so far in this thread.
You couldn’t even follow your own logic. Can we agree now that Clinton was stupid for choosing a lazy and stupid man like Sandy Berger to be his NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR (this is your own point).
Here is what Clinton did
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/197861.php
So IT IS A LIE to say he DESTROYED documents.
Well, he did plead guilty to it.
-=Mike
Mitchell,
thanks. I marvel at the people who can believe that the modern Dem party is a party of the people. Just like the people who believe that the communists care about the poor.
Posted by: LoveAmerica Immigran
Did middle class purchasing power go up or down under Clinton? Bush?
Did the poverty rate go up or down under Clinton? Bush?
How did Clintons job numbers compare with Bush?
http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet
How was the deficit under Clinton? Bush? The stock market?
I’m going to bed. Here’s a goodnight song for all of Bush’s “Christian” soldiers.
WWJD
http://peacetakescourage.cf.huffingtonpost.com/animations/wwjd.html
Sleep tight!!!
Muerigo,
The unemployment numbers under Bush this year was even better than Clinton. Remember the internet bubble in 1999-2000? Clinton had to inflate the GNP by 20% to cover up the declining economy. Clinton had the peace dividends of the end of the cold war and the Gulf War. He basically squandered it. If not for the Rep taking over in 1994, the economy would have been worse. Clinton had oil price at $20 or less.
Bush inherited 9/11 and a recession. The war on terror costs money too. Oil at $70. Bush had a much tougher economic env and he managed it reasonably well so far. Black home ownership under Bush is higher than under Clinton!
Muerigo,
Good night and best wishes with the left ‘s secularist utopia.
Wizbang and specially Kevin, thank you for having this site and the ability to respond here in a comments section.
Muirgeo needs to be fisked. The reason is simple and due to a statement I made above. Clinton was a talker, not a doer. He made folks like Muirgeo feel good but he didn’t accomplish much. It was easy for us back then to call President Clinton a liar because it was demonstrated to be so. Even his supporters like Muirgeo admit it now.
Muirgeo wrote;
On President lied about a personal matter that didn’t get ONE person killed.
I’d like to differ with this. Yes, no one got killed thanks to President Clinton’s lie, we can agree that far. But was his lie about a personal matter? When we are married we tend to be so in public, in front of family and friends and make a vow before them, not in private. Weddings and marriage are public events. This doesn’t appear to be a private matter to me, but a public matter. But even if President Clinton was not married, he was working as our countries CEO and what he did is called sexual harrasment. You cannot be having sexual intercourse with your subordinates on the job and try and use the excuse that it is a private matter. We call them public officials for a reason.
The other read My Pet Goat for 7 minutes while our country was being attacked
This seems like a childish complaint. No one knew what was happening that day. Most of us are old enough to remember it quite vividly still. Were we under attack? All kinds of questions were being asked and confusion reigned during that day. I would hope that our leaders would take their time to respond to such an attack with wisdom and not lash out irrationally, looking at their watches, trying to get off a quick response rather than a wise response.
then he lied us into a war
No he didn’t. What else is there to say to this? It is an article of faith by some that President Bush and his administration lied us into a war but if, as Muirgeo claims above, the facts are important to him, it is quite clear that there were not any lies told here. This is what I was talking about earlier concerning legacy. Once we are out of the political immediacy of his Presidency, this false accusation will wither and die on the vine and the next generation will get the facts rather than the faith.
that has cost us half a trillion dollars
It doesn’t matter what it costs us, as long as it is worth the cost.
far more lives then were lost in 9-11
We lost almost 3,000 lives on 9-11. How many more have we lost since then to equal “far more”?? Or is this like the rest of your statements, hyperbole?
and in the process he committed a felon by violating the wiretap laws
You’re welcome to this opinion but you’ll have to accept the fact that many in this country disagree with you, lawyers and constitutional scholars included, some of which do not support the President but believe it is in his power to protect you and I through wiretapping.
It is educational to know, however, that Democrats complain loudy about this. We havn’t been attacked here in the United States since 9/11 thanks to Bush’s wiretap program.
and he is guilty of war crimes by violating the Geneva Conventions.
This is a new one to me, i’m not even sure what this is refering to.
He’s set up an economy that only advances the very wealthy and will ultimately lead to the 3rd Republican lead Depression as out debt and trade balance grows.
I do not own a crystal ball, so I cannot tell you what the Bush Presidency will lead us to, but I can tell you what it has given me thus far. Perhaps, because I make $50,000 a year and my wife stays home and takes care of our four children that i’m considered the very wealthy that you are referring to but somehow I doubt it. I’m doing very well under President Bush, last year I only had to pay California State Taxes but not any Federal taxes, thanks to President Bush. Also, under the Bush Tax Cuts, it is a fact, not my opinion, that out of all of the taxes paid the wealthiest pay a larger percent than they did prior to the Bush Tax Cuts. This one is easy to know the truth about, so its difficult to think you are being honest with the facts when you get this one wrong.
Meanwhile he’s totally ignored out three biggest threats from WMD from Korea, Pakistan and nuclear material in Russia.
Ignored isn’t the word I would use. For example, he’s trying to have built a missle defense system here in the United States. That’s not ignoring a WMD threat, like Nuclear weapons, that’s addressing the problem by protecting the people.
I propose a challenge, Muirgeo, pick just a single one of the above talking points that I just fisked and try to focus on it and it only and I can bet you won’t be able to provide facts to back up even one of those talking points.
But then what will you do without facts? Change your mind and allow the facts to dictate reality to you, or force the square peg into the round hole?
May God Bless President George W. Bush.
Hey muirgeo, thanks for the factual and informative links. It was really nice to see someone posting who can actually back up what they say. Unlike my god fearing friends on the right.
BTW Mithcell, have YOU ever lived in a Third World country? Or are you just an honorary member of the Third World club because you are married to a person from the Third World? You see big guy, I have, and I have seen first hand what multi national corporations can do to these countries when they rape them for profit. I have also seen what the CIA can do to disrupt a country’s government whose policies they don’t agree with. I have lost loved ones because of JLP thugs, financed by the CIA in Jamaica, who killed them because they supported the Manley government. So don’t tell me about living in the Third World or caring about people who live there. You and your sorry ass pals have probably never contributed a dime, or your time to a worthy cause in your miserable lives.(Tithe on Sunday morning doesn’t count)
All your money goes to the repub-lie-cans so that you can get the next thief elected to steal more money from OUR government. Or better yet, to pocket more money from lobbyist who represent big corporations, who might as well be stealing from our government with their huge tax breaks, and IRS loop holes. All this while they out-source jobs to the very Third World countries they continute to exploit.
You gotta love it!
Does anyone see the irony here?
These bug-eyed, vein-popping kooks on the right are the ones who always, everyday, accuse many who legitimately criticize the Boy Emperor of BushDerangementSyndrome. Mention the name Clinton and these folks start to foam at the mouth, convulse, spew obscenities, beat their children, clean their weapons and watch their blood pressure go through the roof. Talk about a DerangementSyndrome. Good god almighty some of you are down right nuts.
Now here’s the delicious part. Should Hillary become president (I personally hope not) I will have 4-8 of the most enjoyable years of my life reading the posts on this site.
Hugh
Why do you call yourself “field-negro”?
“I didn’t say I supported communism. I support democracy. What do you put first Capitalism or Democracy? Answer that. It’s a straight forward question.”
Posted by: muirgeo
I wasn’t ask the question, but will answer it.
Democracy! However, they are not mutually exclusive.
Now I have a question for you. Is G.W. Bush your president?
I am continually reading comments by the left, that “he isn’t my president”. It would seem that if you agree with this statement, you only believe in Democracy, when you win.
Hugh-
It’s a shame you are going to be disappointed.
Even if a Democrat gets elected, we right wingers have jobs, so we will just continue to drive that economy you like to take credit for when the numbers look good.
It’s you left wingers who are unemployed so you can be “off the grid” (or in your seventh year of taking classes towards your sociology degree) that have the time to let politics consume your lives and drive you insane.
It has been said that terrorism was not mentioned even once during the 2000 campaign. The second most powerful man in the free world, running for president doent mention terrorism ONCE in his campaign..
Dont tell us Bush had 8 months to catch him-that’s bunk. This guy is so worried about his legacy, he’s been making shit up ever since he left office.
PHIL:
As you righties usually do, you missed the boat. I have a college and post-graduate (not in sociology), served in the army for six years and owned my own business for 18 years.
Today I am happily retired. I keep busy with many projects. Years ago I was amused by the funny papers. Today I am amused by reading the nonsense many of you righties post (such as yours).
I almost sound like a Republican, don’t I?
Now I have a question for you. Is G.W. Bush your president?
I am continually reading comments by the left, that “he isn’t my president”. It would seem that if you agree with this statement, you only believe in Democracy, when you win.
Posted by: USMC Pilot
If you win the election by cheating then you are not the President. Much evidence shows he did just that. Further if you have committed felony crimes (breaking the NSA wire tap law) and broken the Laws of the Geneva convention you are not my president….Likewise a Congress that has allowed NO investigations on the many issues surrounding Bush’s actions are negligent of their duty to oversee and balance he power of the President.
Posted by: muirgeo
I wasn’t ask the question, but will answer it.
Democracy! However, they are not mutually exclusive.
Now I have a question for you. Is G.W. Bush your president?
I am continually reading comments by the left, that “he isn’t my president”. It would seem that if you agree with this statement, you only believe in Democracy, when you win.
Posted by: USMC Pilot
Pilot,
In a democracy should there be any doubt about the election results? Should they not be absolutely verifiable?
In a democracy should people with the most money get more access to influence the electoral process, to influence policy and to create the laws?
Should superwealthy people be allowed to walk up to the President and hand him a million dollars to do them a favor?
In a democracy shouldn’t the people will come before that of corporations?
Bottom Line: GOP are winners, Democraps are losers.
Our President doesn’t demean himself responding in kind to the likes of Mungo, Huge, Fieldcrapper, Pee, etc. He’s a gentleman and cares about what he’s doing, unlike the unserious on the Left.
You guys whine and bitch, and that’s all you have. Just like your boy, Bubba Clinton. Because it’s all about perception, and little about substance with you poor fools.
If you guys were such winners, what are you doing over here on a conservative/libertarian website. You are, again, wasting your time. No one here buys your delusional thinking.
Two legacies etched in stone:
Bill Clinton: BJ Bill.
Muirgeo: basement-dwelling parasite.
If you win the election by cheating then you are not the President. Much evidence shows he did just that.
But Chavez…yeah, he was cleanly elected. This is quite ironic. Zero evidence exists that Bush did anything improper.
You keep referencing exit polls, when the results were well within the margin of error…but ignore that the exit polls in Venezuela showed Chavez LOSING by 18 points and he WON by 18 points instead.
A 36 percent swing — or 6 times the margin the error.
But, yeah, Chavez was legally elected while Bush “stole” an election.
Got it.
There is no limit to the thugs progressives will embrace to attack Bush.
Further if you have committed felony crimes (breaking the NSA wire tap law) and broken the Laws of the Geneva convention you are not my president.
Except no crime was committed. There is much case law completely supporting Bush’s actions.
Likewise a Congress that has allowed NO investigations on the many issues surrounding Bush’s actions are negligent of their duty to oversee and balance he power of the President.
So you only support democracy when you win. Got it.
In a democracy should there be any doubt about the election results? Should they not be absolutely verifiable?
There is no doubt. There are only insepid insinuations.
In a democracy should people with the most money get more access to influence the electoral process, to influence policy and to create the laws?
Hate to break it to you — but that’s THE LEFT. Soros ain’t poor. Hollywood ain’t poor.
Heck, look at the fund-raising, for example, of the election recount funds in 2000. The Dems were bankrolled, by about an 87% margin, by less than 100 people.
-=Mike
“If you guys were such winners, what are you doing over here on a conservative/libertarian website. You are, again, wasting your time. No one here buys your delusional thinking.”
Actually, we are doing what wiiners do. Learning about other points of views and debating them. Which, by the way, is something you might want to consider; it will do wonders for your intellect. As far as no one buying our “delusional thinking”, trust me,we are well aware of your predilection towards ignorance on this site, but still enjoy exposing you for the frauds you are.
BTW, the key word -not sure about Hugh,and muirgeao-with me is “libertarian”,so I am glad you put that in your post.
“Why do you call yourself “field-negro”?”
Sang, I have explained that on this site before, and I don’t feel like explaining it again. But I am sure you have a computer, so look it up. Just point and click where is says field-negro 😉 I am always glad to educate folks in “the greatest country on god’s green earth” 🙂
Hmm, your side has pulled down a majority in a Presidential election once in 44 years.
I’m not sure I’ll listen to you on what “winners” do.
After all, your side was convinced Kerry would win, even though we told you he was a shit candidate.
-=Mike
Exactly, MikeSC.
If they’re winners, I’d hate to see what the losers look like.
Hey, if all you have is winning in your own mind, then that’s something, at least. Makes those fevered, Bush-hating evenings go faster, I guess.
“If they’re winners, I’d hate to see what the losers look like.”
Look in the mirror 😉
…At least he did try. Why isn’t the MSM asking Bush why he didn’t try for the first year of his presidency?
Also, I think one sign of Clinton’s greater maturity compared to Republicans is that Clinton doesn’t try to blame the 1993 bombing on Bush I, the way Republicans keep trying to blame 9/11 on Clinton instead of the guy who was actually in charge.
Also http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2006_09_01_digbysblog_archive.html#115896507286191947
“And back in the day Republicans were so concerned about encroaching federal police power that they routinely watered down Clinton’s anti-terrorism proposals…
“Yes, they cared a lot about a police state when a Democrat was in office. So much so that looking back you’d have to conclude that by their standards today they failed to properly anticipate the threat.”
Actually, that the Dems try to blame Bush for 9/11 is a sign of immense immaturity.
-=Mike
I still can’t believe I voted twice for Clinton, that utter boob. How can someone supposedly so smart continuously spew such self-centered inanities? And he’s the BEST they’ve got.
Bottom Line: GOP are winners, Democraps are losers.
Posted by: Mitchell
Or Bottom Line: Multinational Corporations, the Wealthy Elite, the Robber Barrons, the Chickenhawks, the War Profiteers and thier ignorant minions (who think they are winners but are NOT) are winners and Democracy, the middle class, the working poor , the poor, peace, reason and government OF, BY and FOR the people are losers.
Now why are you happy about that why??…..oh that’s right your a delusional ignorant uninformed minion. Fricking Matrix material!
Or Bottom Line: Multinational Corporations, the Wealthy Elite, the Robber Barrons, the Chickenhawks, the War Profiteers and thier ignorant minions (who think they are winners but are NOT) are winners and Democracy, the middle class, the working poor , the poor, peace, reason and government OF, BY and FOR the people are losers.
————————————————–
Perfect description of the corruption of the modern left: supporting the corrupt UN with oil-for-food bribing of big national corporations in France, Russia, China (basically selling the poor and oppressed people in the ME for oil). Then sexual abuse of poor refugees in Africa. In America, the liberal dems are willing to sell out the poor blacks in inner cities asking for school vouchers to gain the favor of the liberal mega filthy rich like George Soros and Hollywood left.
Thank you for the self description of the intellectual and moral corruption of the modern left.
BTW, the left ‘s hypocrisy is amazing. They constantly using the word chickenhawks, but the love the chickenhawk country France. France is a perfect symbol of the chickenhawk left: France destroyed the air force of Ivory Coast, a little country whose president tried to apologize for a mistake they made. They didn’t care about these poor little countries while kissing up to the big bad boys to get their oil. The hypocritical behavior is just astounding: the left in this country can diss out the beyond the pale accusation/attack against America and Bush and the pope knowing that they are safe. At the same time, they dare not utter an ounce of outrage against the atrocities of the terrorists. Not only that they enable and promote the worst kinds of dictators like Adm and Chavez.
The left is truly the chickenhawks: talk tough against the people who protect them but wag their tails before the terrorists. Beyond contempt in my opinion.
There is really nothing to respond to here. I provided factual links that document what Clinton did in the fight against terrorism and the only replies are in the form of unsubstantiated innuendo.
Likewise they are completly unable to find any evidence of action taken by Bush until 7 minutes AFTER the second plane hit…..”Duhh I wonderr if I should take this terrorism stuff seriously…duhhhhhh!
But coming from a group of people who think the Earth is 6,000 years old, that evolution and global warming are hoaxes and that if they heard it on Rush it must be fact what more do I have to prove.
A thread like this is just validation that these Bushbots are incapable of logical discussion and debate and can NOT support their innuendo with references while I can support my claims.
Like shootin fish in a barrel.