The New York Times Isn’t Pleased with Judge Anna Diggs Taylor

The New York Times takes a swipe at Judge Anna Diggs Taylor for not disclosing her connection to the ACLU, a plaintiff in her courtroom in the NSA case. They were just as dismayed that it was Judicial Watch that discovered Judge Taylor’s conflict of interest:

When Judge Anna Diggs Taylor was given the job of deciding whether the Bush administration’s wiretapping program was unconstitutional, she certainly understood that she would be ruling on one of the most politically charged cases in recent history. So it would have been prudent for her to disclose any activity that might conceivably raise questions about her ability to be impartial. Regrettably, it was left to a conservative group, Judicial Watch, to point out her role as a trustee to a foundation that had given grants to a branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, a plaintiff in the case.

Of course she knew she would be deciding one of the most politically charged cases in recent history. That’s why she didn’t disclose her relationship with the ACLU. And if it weren’t for the New York Times, this case woudn’t have even been brought before the court to begin with.

McCain on Iraq
Serious Business

20 Comments

  1. mantis August 24, 2006
  2. John F Not Kerry August 24, 2006
  3. Publicus August 24, 2006
  4. Wanderlust August 24, 2006
  5. Eric August 24, 2006
  6. jpe August 24, 2006
  7. Eric August 24, 2006
  8. Eric August 24, 2006
  9. jpe August 24, 2006
  10. jpe August 24, 2006
  11. mantis August 24, 2006
  12. jpe August 24, 2006
  13. Jim Addison August 24, 2006
  14. jpe August 24, 2006
  15. Lee August 24, 2006
  16. Red Fog August 24, 2006
  17. jpe August 24, 2006
  18. robert August 24, 2006
  19. Thor-Zone August 25, 2006
  20. Red Fog August 25, 2006