Israel to UN and Lebanon: War Resumes if Hezbollah not Disarmed

Updated

Israel will resume its offensive against Hezbollah if it does not disarm. From the Jerusalem Post:

The IDF will have to resume operations in Lebanon if the expanded United Nations force being assembled does not fulfill its obligation to dismantle Hizbullah, an official in the Prime Minister’s Office warned on Tuesday.

Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Saniora and Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah reportedly reached a deal allowing Hizbullah to keep its weapons but refrain from exhibiting them in public. Israeli officials called the arrangement a violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which passed over the weekend and was approved on Sunday by the cabinet.

“The resolution is clear that Hizbullah needs to be removed from the border area, embargoed and dismantled,” the official said. “If the resolution is not implemented, we will have to take action to prevent the rearming of Hizbullah. I don’t think backtracking will serve any useful purpose. There has to be pressure on Hizbullah to disarm or there will have to be another round.”

Rounds are for boxing. This is war. Israel needs to finish the job.

And Kofi Annan and his band of useless men prove that the only thing the UN can achieve is irrelevance. Annan once again refuses to enforce the UN’s resolution:

Annan angered Israeli officials when he told Channel 2 on Tuesday that “dismantling Hizbullah is not the direct mandate of the UN,” which could only help Lebanon disarm the organization. Annan upset officials further when he said that deploying international forces in Lebanon would take “weeks or months,” and not days as expected.

Captain Ed couldn’t be more right on Kofi Annan’s failed leadership:

None of us who follow the UN and Kofi Annan experienced any sort of surprise when he demurred from actually enforcing a Security Council resolution. His insistence that the UN has no real interest in the question of Hezbollah disarmament may seem shocking, since the Security Council has now twice demanded it, but it comes as a piece to the record of UN peacekeeping under his regime, first as the head of peacekeeping and now as Secretary-General. UN forces sent to keep “peace” have almost without exception fled from terrorists and genocidists, only standing firm when under NATO or US/UK command.

Update: Israel is saying it won’t withdraw unless the Lebanese army deploys to Southern Lebanon.

BEIRUT (Reuters) – Israel said on Wednesday it would stop withdrawing from south Lebanon unless Lebanese troops moved there within days, as diplomats worked on plans for a stronger U.N. force to bolster the truce with Hizbollah guerrillas.

The Lebanese cabinet will order an immediate army deployment in the south when it meets later in the day, a senior political source said, adding that a 15,000-strong force would start taking up positions south of the Litani River, about 20 km (13 miles) from the Israeli border, on Thursday.

French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy, holding talks in Beirut, urged Lebanon to send the army south rapidly to move alongside U.N. peacekeepers into areas vacated by the Israelis.

“The withdrawal of the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) within 10 days is dependent upon the deployment of the Lebanese army,” Israel’s army chief Dan Halutz told parliament’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, according to a spokesman.

“If the Lebanese army does not move down within a number of days to the south … the way I see it, we must stop our withdrawal,” Halutz said.

A Hero Laid To Rest In Peace
What Came First - The Can Opener or The Can?

10 Comments

  1. Scrapiron August 16, 2006
  2. d_Brit August 16, 2006
  3. drjohn August 16, 2006
  4. Davidllin August 16, 2006
  5. ed August 16, 2006
  6. Jim Addison August 16, 2006
  7. Liz August 16, 2006
  8. Lee August 16, 2006
  9. ed August 16, 2006
  10. Rachell March 15, 2007