Islam Is (Still) Not The Enemy

I received an email Saturday from Errol Phillips, regarding the necessary course for America to win the War on Global Terror. Phillips contends that “our leaders” are too “P.C.” to take what Phillips contends is the necessary action of “rounding up” Muslims for the safety of Americans. Otherwise, says Phillips, Americans “will have to take matters into our own hands and do what is necessary to protect our way of life and our families.”

I could not disagree more.

As I am a Southern Baptist in doctrine, and have long noted the disparity between what is taught by the Bible and by the Quran, I certainly do not agree with much that Islam claims, as a religion. That said, I cannot condone the collective demonization of nearly a billion people simply because of how they choose to serve God. There have been, according to a site which blames Islam for Islamofascism, 5,568 “deadly acts of terror” since the 9/11 attacks. Assuming this to be true, that works out to about one act of terror for every 197,557 Muslims. Since it is reasonable to believe that the same people commit these kinds of acts, the ratio is far closer to more than one million Muslims who have never committed a violent act for every Muslim who has committed one. Frankly, that speaks rather well of Islam.

So what’s going on? What I mean is, Islam has not exactly done a great job of defending its image as a religion of freedom and peace. Groups like CAIR, frankly, do more damage than support for their cause, as they cannot seem to understand that people do not trust groups which will not be accountable for the bad things done in their name. It should be remembered that Christianity had to split in half before the Roman Catholic Church, oh so grudgingly, came about to admit that the Inquisition and things like Simony and Indulgences were not very Christ-like. I mention this, because the overwhelming majority of Protestants today accept the Roman Catholics as real Christians and brothers in Christ, and see the late Pope John Paul II as a true saint. It should also be recalled that John Paul II was never shy to criticize authorities, whether the Soviets, the Americans, the Protestants – or the Catholics.

But getting back to the point, most Muslims should not be confused, at all, with the people who claim to speak for the faith, much less the extremists who think that God is impressed by a bloodbath. I know this, because in my garrulous habit of chatting up anyone willing to have a conversation with me, I have made acquaintance with a fair number of Muslims here in Houston. They tend to keep their privacy, for a number of reasons, but when they speak they often do so with a fervor and conviction I find straightforward. For the longest time, Muslims have addressed their own community, thinking of the world as pretty much an alien place. This allows fiends like bin Laden and Khomeini an open stage to claim the mantle of religious leadership, especially since Islam teaches that a man who claims moral authority he does not really receive from God is in dire peril of his soul. The soulless, of course, do not worry about that.

I also discovered that many Muslims are unsure of American motives. We value freedom, but that freedom protects pornography and obscenity. We have laws, but the rich seem to get away, literally, with murder. We offer products at good price all around the world, but it seems that we inject our culture into everything we touch. Muslims are not keen to have their daughters be seen as sex objects, their men judged mainly on their ability to make money, and their families mocked for practicing traditional beliefs and holding closely to their culture. When America speaks to the world, Muslims worry that we are giving orders, not making suggestions. So, most Muslims are reluctant to appear too supportive of America. Even those who agree with the American way of life worry that the Arab world would misunderstand them.

The false image of America in the Muslim world is hard enough to correct, but it can be done. Indeed, the changes in Iraq and Afghanistan are going a long way to prove the extremists liars. But it is imperative that the American people, even if they do not agree with the teachings of Islam, do not wrongly blame Islam for everything done in its name.


I am curious about the generic rage against Islam. The posters in the comments have – in sadly predictable fashion – blamed ALL of Islam for the actions of a very few. The question then is this: Do you side with Mr. Phillips, who wants the U.S. Government to round up Muslims and put them into camps, simply for being Muslims? Why or why not?

Please defend your position with relevant explanations of the necessary Constitutional complications, to say nothing of the likely response.

Naming names
Hezbollah Official Says Israel Can Be Destroyed...Soon


  1. Brian August 13, 2006
  2. brian August 13, 2006
  3. Derek August 13, 2006
  4. Dale August 13, 2006
  5. John August 13, 2006
  6. Mitchell August 13, 2006
  7. Big Mo August 13, 2006
  8. idgit August 13, 2006
  9. Peace Moonbeam August 13, 2006
  10. ed August 13, 2006
  11. Spoons August 13, 2006
  12. Brian August 13, 2006
  13. scrapiron August 13, 2006
  14. Old Coot August 13, 2006
  15. jpm100 August 13, 2006
  16. Gabriel August 13, 2006
  17. Luke August 13, 2006
  18. dchamil August 13, 2006
  19. eman August 13, 2006
  20. Kevin (a different one) August 13, 2006
  21. jainphx August 13, 2006
  22. La Mano August 13, 2006
  23. Jennifer K. August 13, 2006
  24. Brian August 13, 2006
  25. Kathy August 13, 2006
  26. mvargus August 13, 2006
  27. greenstater August 13, 2006
  28. DJ Drummond August 13, 2006
  29. Pete G August 13, 2006
  30. villagepundit August 13, 2006
  31. greenstater August 14, 2006
  32. Galaxio August 14, 2006
  33. Mitchell August 14, 2006
  34. Son Of The Godfather August 14, 2006
  35. James August 14, 2006
  36. dodgeman August 14, 2006
  37. Tom Johnson August 14, 2006
  38. DJFelix August 14, 2006
  39. tachi August 15, 2006
  40. Errol Phillip August 19, 2006