HomeHumorKarl Rove, The Grinch Who Stole Fitzmas Karl Rove, The Grinch Who Stole Fitzmas Kevin May 19, 2006 Humor, The Looney Left, Valerie Plame 41 Comments And now a very special message from Karl Rove to intrepid Plamegate reporters Jason Leopold and Wayne Madsen… Previously Karl Rove Indicted For Perjury? Karl Rove Indicted For Perjury, Again Online Hazing Pictures Rock College Campuses Stop Me If You've Heard This One Before... Related Posts The resemblance is indeed uncanny Bernie Sanders Wants a Religious Test for Office Al Gore To Get Lifetime Award For "Creating The Internet" About The Author Kevin Kevin founded Wizbang in 2003. He still contributes occasionally and handles all the technical and design work for the site. 41 Comments cubanbob May 19, 2006 While I could be proven wrong and Rove could be indicted as I’m typing this, it would appear to any sensible person if this was going to happen it would have happened by now. The prosecution doesn’t have a case against Rove or Libby and is trying to save face and invent one. It may never go to trial and peter out in a minor plea to save Libby a continuing fortune in legal fees and the prosecutor bringing an embarrassingly weak case to trial. Les Nessman May 19, 2006 “Filed under: Humor, The Looney Left, Valerie Plame “ Kind of redundant, yes? Especially as it pertains to this ‘case’. Rodney Dill May 19, 2006 Phbbbt! OregonMuse May 19, 2006 Note to Lee jp2 maggie himself etc. Sorry to hear that Karl once again harshed your mellow. Better luck next time. mak44 May 19, 2006 To all who are busily counting their Rotten Rove Not Indicted eggs before they’re hatched….. The Grand Jury still sits & Fitzgerald is known to be exceedingl ythorough. He also is renowned for not filing losing indictments. Rove still has not been told that he is no longer a subject in this case. As to cubanboob’s assertion that there is no case against Libby-you’re pissing in the wind…. and lt’s blowing your way. You have only to look at some of the documents in this case filed by Fitz, esp. this past week wherein WH documents & emails show unmistakably that Libby & Cheney were consumed w/ Plame/Wilson to the extent that Libby’s lame claim that there was so much on his plate that he was simply a victim of “bad memory”looks preposterous. He’ll have a hard time selling that crap to a jury altho I’m sure he could convince a drooling retard like cubanboob that the Moon is made of green cheese and that, yes, cubanboob, there really is a Santa Claus. SmartGuy May 19, 2006 Changing “cubanbob” to “cubanboob” certainly indicates a strong argument and lots of credibility. mak44 May 19, 2006 SmartGuy If you had followed cubanboob’s irrational & semi-literate posts on this site from the past, you would see that he is the one who hasn’t learned how to spell his name. Scrapiron May 19, 2006 Rove outed a CIA secretary. Liberals went nuts. Rove leaked a secret prison story. Liberals went nuts. Rove leaked a telephone number data base. Liberals went nuts. 1. The secretary was not an undercover agent. 2. There are no secret prisons. 3. There is no phone data bank. That only leaves the possibility that the liberals are all stupid buy any story nuts. What will he leak next, that the entire democratic party is made up of criminals and child molestors. Na, that’s too close to being the truth. Gotta be something they don’t already know. ed May 20, 2006 Hmmm. What will he leak next Perhaps that Senator Palpatine is really a Sith? mak44 May 20, 2006 Crapiron You weote: “1. The secretary was not an undercover agent.” You don’t know squat about what you are talking, if you are referring to Plame. Her position was at the highest undercover level & she was involvrd w/ intelligence regarding Iran’s WMD, namely nuclear program. It was the CIA that went to DOJ about her outing because of the damage done by whomever was involved in the leak. You assinine right=wingnuts who are now ready to bomb Iran to stop Iran’s nuke program ought to be among the most outraged. Instead, you hypocritical pack of Bush toadies bend over w/ your heads up your ass bleating that Plame was not a CIA undercover agent. The perpoetrator of Plame’s outing committed treason & you Kool Aid swilling fools don’t give a damn brcause it was someone in the WH. SOME PATRIOTS!!!!!! Cro May 20, 2006 From a CNN interview: BLITZER: But the other argument that’s been made against you is that you’ve sought to capitalize on this extravaganza, having that photo shoot with your wife, who was a clandestine officer of the CIA, and that you’ve tried to enrich yourself writing this book and all of that. What do you make of those accusations, which are serious accusations, as you know, that have been leveled against you. WILSON: My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity. Transcript can be read here Even the main perperator of this farce admits the truth…why can’t you? mak44 May 20, 2006 Cro You excerpt selectively: following your excerpt, Wilson also points out, ” That’s not anything that I can talk about. And, indeed, I’ll go back to what I said earlier, the CIA believed that a possible crime had been committed, and that’s why they referred it to the Justice Department.” It was the CIA that filed the complaint w/ DOJ, so your quote means nothing in regard to this case. It amazes me how you wingnuts will bend over to excuse something that the CIA believed had harmed the security of this country. Of course your craven & sycophantic worship of this war-criminal president knows no bounds. Earlier in that piece on Plame, Bush is quoted as saying that he wants to get to the bottom of who leaked & that they will be dealt with. Of course he has done nothing to fulfill that pledge to the American people. To date, it appears that Cheney was the orchestrator of this crime ( see details of Fitzpatrick’s recent court filings) out of pique because Wilson had exposed Cheney’s monstrous “nuclear cloud” lies in his NYTimes Op Ed article. You extreme right wingnuts appear to have a deep & abiding affection for Liars. McGehee May 20, 2006 Strangely, Wilson’s NYT op-ed seems to have contradicted what he told his handlers in his debriefing after returning from Africa. Mak44, you extreme left wingers appear to have a deep and abiding affection for liars, and for projecting your lies on other people. MikeSC May 20, 2006 You excerpt selectively: following your excerpt, Wilson also points out, ” That’s not anything that I can talk about. And, indeed, I’ll go back to what I said earlier, the CIA believed that a possible crime had been committed, and that’s why they referred it to the Justice Department.” And no crime was committed. Live and learn. It was the CIA that filed the complaint w/ DOJ, so your quote means nothing in regard to this case. It amazes me how you wingnuts will bend over to excuse something that the CIA believed had harmed the security of this country. Of course your craven & sycophantic worship of this war-criminal president knows no bounds. No, the CIA has had a war with Bush for years now. They’ve done all they can do to try and harm him politically. I mean, they sent Wilson and didn’t make him sign a non-disclosure agreement — which NOBODY has ever gotten before. They allowed Scheuer to write a book using classified material — as long as it attacked Bush. Earlier in that piece on Plame, Bush is quoted as saying that he wants to get to the bottom of who leaked & that they will be dealt with. Of course he has done nothing to fulfill that pledge to the American people. To date, it appears that Cheney was the orchestrator of this crime ( see details of Fitzpatrick’s recent court filings) out of pique because Wilson had exposed Cheney’s monstrous “nuclear cloud” lies in his NYTimes Op Ed article. Shame what Wilson reported to the CIA and what he said to the NY Times was so dramatically different, huh? And what Bush said was that anybody who broke the law would no longer work for him. He’s been quite good about keeping his word there. You extreme right wingnuts appear to have a deep & abiding affection for Liars. Said the guy who was defending Wilson and had no clue how ironic it was to say that. -=Mike wavemaker May 20, 2006 “I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMAN.” “I DID NOT SEXUALLY HARRASS THAT STATE EMPLOYEE.” “I DID NOT SEXUALLY HARRASS THAT WIDOW.” “I DID NOT RAPE THAT WOMAN.” “I HAVE NO RECOLLECTION ABOUT THOSE BILLING RECORDS.” Yes, Mike, only Republicans are liars. Now mix me some cool aid. wavemaker May 20, 2006 Oops. Sorry Mike…I meant MAK (as usual) mak44 May 20, 2006 Cro You excerpt selectively: following your excerpt, Wilson also points out, ” That’s not anything that I can talk about. And, indeed, I’ll go back to what I said earlier, the CIA believed that a possible crime had been committed, and that’s why they referred it to the Justice Department.” It was the CIA that filed the complaint w/ DOJ, so your quote means nothing in regard to this case. It amazes me how you wingnuts will bend over to excuse something that the CIA believed had harmed the security of this country. Of course your craven & sycophantic worship of this war-criminal president knows no bounds. Earlier in that piece on Plame, Bush is quoted as saying that he wants to get to the bottom of who leaked & that they will be dealt with. Of course he has done nothing to fulfill that pledge to the American people. To date, it appears that Cheney was the orchestrator of this crime ( see details of Fitzpatrick’s recent court filings) out of pique because Wilson had exposed Cheney’s monstrous “nuclear cloud” lies in his NYTimes Op Ed article. You extreme right wingnuts appear to have a deep & abiding affection for Liars. mak44 May 20, 2006 wavemaker With the exception of your first reference, none of the rest were ever proven. But, the most important point is: were all your slimey Limbarf & Insanity poll-parroted references true, not one of these “lies” falsely led a nation to war w/ the resultant murder of 2455 ( as of 5/19) Americans and another 18.5K Americans turned into ground-up Bush meat. So go on w/ your assinine poll-parroted crap that is primarily based on the Limbarf/Insanity propaganda machine. You just reflect that you have been thoroughly brainwashed: of course that would require at least having a brain for starters. epador May 20, 2006 See what happens when you feed the Trolls? Zelsdorf May 20, 2006 Mak 44 is an idiot, a liar, and a person with a faulty memory. The senate committee found Wilson to be the liar. A simple review of history will show the Clinton administration, such as it was, firmly believed Saddam was armed with WMD (funny, most of the rest of the world did also)and was in immanent danger to the US. Moonbats with short memories forget what their hero once said. But we know that rhetoric was to divert attention from Clinton’s other activities. Mak, go visit the Daily Kos. More of your kind over there. mak44 May 20, 2006 Zelsdorf How appropos–you’re user name!!!! First off: I am sick of all the “Clinton thought there were WMD’s” crap. That is the usual Limbarf/Insanity bilge that has no relevancy whatsoever regarding the Iraq war. If you want to be the typical mindless GOPer poll-parrot & endlessly prate that talking point, you are winning no debate, but you are reflecting that you are just another Pavlovian Puppy yelping and salivating on cue. Clinton was not President; therefore, whatever he may have believed or not has no relevancy. And whatever world leaders who may have believed that crap, it was primarily due to the Bush regime’s lies about WMD & the phoney UN Powell presentation with which Bush allowed Powell to humiliate himself before the entire world. Funny that the rest of the world did not intend to give the U.S free reign in the U.N. over Iraq. Bush cut short the inspections because he wasn’t seeking the truth about Iraq’s WMD & he even proposed a contrivance w/ Blair to use a phoney UN marked U-2 to create a case for war. According to Tyler Drumheller of the CIA, there was no “slam dunk” about Iraq’s WMD’s & there were plenty of CIA analysts who did not believe Bush’s case to be an accurate assessment. But when Bush let that war-criminal Cheney cherry-pick intelligence to create false propaganda for war, he was either asleep at the switch or guilty of war crimes. The Bush regime’s propaganda about an al-Qaeda/Iraq link was pure deliberate fraud. Bush/Cheney Co. had been gunning for Iraq from the day Bush was appointed pres.-elect by the Supreme Court. And on the afternoon of 9/11, before anyone knew anything about the perpetratores of the atrocity, Rummy was in DOD ordering Gen. Myers to find the “b]est info fast . . . judge whether good enough [to] hit S.H. [Saddam Hussein] at same time – not only UBL [Usama Bin Laden]” And Rummy further ordered his aides to “”Go massive . . . Sweep it all up. Things related and not” according to an aide’s notes obtained under the FOIA. The Bush regime had been gunning for war from Day 1. You are so full of the Limbarf/Insanity propaganda bilge that you are unable to perceive reality. But one thing for sure is that it wasn’t Clinton who lied this country into a monstrous war. He may have gotten a hummer or 2 in the Oval Office, but 2455 Americans did not die for that error. So click your heels, Zelsdorf, and march off to a little Truth & Reality. ed May 20, 2006 Hmmm. Clinton was not President; therefore, whatever he may have believed or not has no relevancy. That is either utterly insane or utterly stupid. Or both. SCSIwuzzy May 20, 2006 This is what happens when I take a few days off… Somebody else gets to wrangle the moonbats. Tony Cambece May 20, 2006 Back to the OP. At least DUmmie Funnies has been a riot this week! This is a must see meltdown at DU! Some idiot is now claiming that Rove hasen’t been photographed all week, proving he is in jail! Rob in LA Ca. May 20, 2006 Poor embattled , bitter and disgruntled mak44, you just can’t undo the past , transpired events , facts that have come to light , become known , happened or occured. Sorry Charlie. The Democrats made a conscience decision to support the Prick BJ Clinton , defend his lies , his crimes and corruption. Now the entire Country suffers for it. Democrats have left malodor with every lie they spew and are that which gives the fetor of polluted waters. You are of zero value.You are a willing hosts for the democrat leech. A follower who hangs around a host (without benefit to the host) in hope of gain or advantage. You are by your own choice “a useful idiot”. Democrats have become parasites to our Country one that grows, feeds, and lives on and off of yet to whose survival it contributes nothing, while at the same time enthusiastically engages in causing it harm. The only way the Democrats can win or gain power is if the opposition falls down and breaks a leg, fails or is perceived to have failed and thus is born , the greatest fraud currently being perpetrated by the democrat party onto the citizens of this Country. This is just one of many tactics in their desparate multifacited last ditch effort for the survival of their failed and rejected party.”THE DEMOCRAT PARTY” the cancer of The United States of America. mak44 May 20, 2006 RobLA I would hope, that when you speak, as opposed to write, that you can comminicate at least semi-literately. From your slobbering & drooling remarks above, I suspect that you are one Pavlovian Puppy salivating so profusely that your keyboard is awash in drool. Maybe that explains why your post is so illiterate. Or is the Rob short for Roberto & you are some detestable immigrant whose English is not even a second language? Being as close to Mexico as L.A., one cannot be certain. Go howl at the moon & foam….you are rabid. Rob in LA Ca. May 20, 2006 “He may have gotten a hummer or 2 in the Oval Office,” A HA! The hidden truth always comes out of the lunatic liberal losers. This is the soul reason why the democrats are worthless and in the MINORITY. 1. “IT’S BECAUSE HE GOT A LITTLE HUMMER OR TWO” But who gives a flying F**K! 2. IT’S WHAT HE (BJ CLINTON) AND EVER DUMBASS DEMOCRAT DID AFTER THE HUDREDS OF LIES HE TOLD. YOU LOW LIFE SHIT FOR BRAINS CONTINUED TO TELL LIES. ALL YOU DO IS LIE. YOUR PATHETIC FRAUD OF A PERFORMANCE BY YOUR CIRCUS FREAK LEADERS ABOUT BEING HONEST , HA! THAT WAS A LIE! DEMOCRATS WILL NEVER TELL THE TRUTH , ADMIT TO THEIR LIES OR RUN AN HONEST ELECTION. IT IS MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE , THE INSTANT SHOULD THEY DECIDE TO COMMIT POLITICAL SUICIDE BY BEING HONEST AND TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT THE CRIMES , CORRUPTION AND INFINITE NUMBER OF LIES THEY SPEW THEY WOULD BE REDUCED TO PILE OF ASH. THE TRUTH IS TO DEMOCRATS WHAT SUNLIGHT IS TO VAMPIRES THIS IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE TO THE POINT THAT CHILDREN ARE BORN WITH THIS FACT SEARED IN THEIR MEMORY BANKS AS ARE INSTICTS. QUESTION: WHY ARE DEMOCRATS IN THE MINORITY IN THE HOUSE , THE SENATE AND HAVE LOST THE LAST 7 OUT OF 10 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS? EVEN WITH WIDESPREAD ELECTION FRAUD DEAD VOTERS , MICKEY MOUSE , DICK TRACY BLA BLA BLA AND WITH 90% OF THE LIBERAL MEDIA LYING AND MISLEADING THEIR ASSES OFF FOR THE CRIMINAL DEMOCRAT PARTY. GOT AN ANSWER MR. mak44? please explain in detail if dare. mak44 May 20, 2006 Mr. ed- the talking ass I failt to see how your quote from my post followed by your drool advances any position you might have. The bells must be ringing, because the posts this afternoon are awash w/ the drool of the demented. Rob in LA Ca. May 20, 2006 Wow! a super intellectual has been sent to calm the raging beasts within us that we may abandon all instincts of self preservation and resign ourselves to “TURN THE OTHER CHEEK” while the unapologetic and deviant democrats sinisterly rub their hands together and plot their next malicious deviltry. I have no desire to surrender my soul to such magniloquencent rhetoric nor am trembling with fear that I must fall victim to your casuistries. Your may peddle your wares elsewear imparticularly the Huffington Post where I’m sure you’ll enjoy the palaver. Mr. mak22x2 you are getting weaker , you cannot fool me , you cannot deceive me because your mind is an open book to me. mak44 May 20, 2006 RobLA You must be one of the few Repubs who did drugs, cause your mind is fried. Just look at your lunatic post. I’d like to know if it makes sense even to you. If I were one of the True Believers on this blogsite, you’d embarrass me. As it is, you demonstrate that Bush’s remaining 30% approval is coming from the howlers. You justkeep making my point. What, did you get a weekend pass from the Institute? Rob in LA Ca. May 20, 2006 Why do you assume I am a Rebulican? I find it amusing when you and others make such affronting assertions. Which is why it is so easy to refute your erroneous claims. Your refusal to accept what is the truth supported by facts is a character deffect of the Democrat Party and you their supporter. This is a perfect example and an arguement you simply cannot win. It is best to just be silent yet you will always be compelled to make an arguement of it regardless of how obviously futile it is. The fact is that I have been a registered voting democrat of over 15 years and you most assuredly will think me a liar. I could care less of what you think or believe , the facts remain the same. Reality deals with facts and truth not with what you feel or what you believe. I know the sun will burn my skin if left unprotected (A FACT) While you believe in Santa Clause and what the democrat party says not because they are backed by facts but just because they say it. It’s a huge and undisputable difference. OregonMuse May 20, 2006 You must be one of the few Repubs who did drugs, cause your mind is fried. Interesting. Are you suggesting that drug abuse more properly falls within the purview of the Democratic party? Don’t know if that’s true, but it would explain a lot. OregonMuse May 20, 2006 Rob, SCSIwuzzy, etc.: Don’t be too hard on the moonbats. Look at the awful position they’re in: Jason Leopold, one of their own, led them to believe that their wildest fantasy, the one they’ve been panting over for 6 years, was going to happen on Friday. All week long, the Krazy Kos Kidz, the DUmmies, the moveon morons, and all the other denizens of the Soros fever swamps were getting themselves all stroked up for a massive jizz-fest, AND THEN IT DIDN’T HAPPEN. The intense stimulation provided by Leopold stopped just maddeningly short of the much-anticipated Big Kahuna. Can you imagine how frustrating that must be? And then they come over here to wizbang and what’s the first thing they see? A photo of Karl Rove giving them a big wet, fruity Bronx cheer. AIEEEE! No wonder they sound like they’re in the middle of some kind of vapor lock. It can’t get much worse than that for them, can it? OregonMuse May 20, 2006 Seriously, though, a good question to ask at this point is: what the hell is Patrick Fitzgerald actually doing? He was supposedly “winding down” his investigation shortly after the Libby indictments were handed down, but there’s no sign that this is actually happening. As to what might be coming, we certainly can’t predict, but I don’t think he’s going to spend all this time and effort and then announce “there will be no indictments.” So it may very well be that a Rove indictiment is coming down at some point — just not this weekend. Or maybe someone else will get indicted. Whatever the case, I believe that the indictment will be not for leaking Valerie Plame’s identity to the media, or mugging old ladies or whatever else the moonbats are fantasizing he did, but rather something that happened during the investigation. Like perjury or obstruction of justice, or some such. Which is the case with Libby. Rob in LA Ca. May 20, 2006 You must be one of the few Repubs who did drugs, cause your mind is fried. “Interesting. Are you suggesting that drug abuse more properly falls within the purview of the Democratic party? Don’t know if that’s true, but it would explain a lot” Posted by: OregonMuse at May 20, 2006 07:56 PM Good observation Oregon, isn’t it amazing how easy it is at times to get them to unwittingly volunteer information. Fraud Kerry and Hilary the Hun were more than proud of the fact that over 80% of felons vote democrat. That pathetic attempt at another reason why they lost or how the election was stolen , spinnable either way with the thousands of “would have voted democrat if only…” senario. Democrats don’t even vote for democrats on merrit , pretty sad and obvious. virgo May 20, 2006 Patrick Fitzgerald is just ringing up the bar tab “ka-ching ka-ching” so He and his other Hack brethren Ronnie Earl& Robert Nifong can all sing Kumbaya and drink Margueritas at Taxpayer funded expense, yknow its the latest fad among corrupt prosecutors.. oh he will also write a book and do the talk show circuit, just like the good money grubbing parasite that He is.. mak44 You must love having Your head stuck up Your bung hole because Your ignorance of truth is astounding! You Trollhaugen. mak44 May 20, 2006 Virgo Your attack on Fitzgerald is pathetic. He is regarded in most circles as an axemplary prosecutor. \So your snide & unsupportable comments simply reflect that you are the ass…as usual. virgo May 20, 2006 What attack hack? once again the truth gets in the way of Your meandering thought processies,glitterbag. unsupportable comments? now You sound just like Fitzgerald! MikeSC May 20, 2006 Hmm, I wonder where the left-wing critiques of all of the money wasted on a pointless investigation aren’t being aired about Fitz… -=Mike ed May 20, 2006 Hmmmm. I failt to see how your quote from my post followed by your drool advances any position you might have. Well you’re consistent. My point is that anybody who doesn’t realise that Clinton was the President and he did believe there were WMDs is a complete imbecile. capt joe May 21, 2006 Wow, these leftie trolls are sooo upset. Some seriously harshed mellow there. Well as Nelson would say: HAA ha!