Exploring the nuclear option

Like a lot of people, the rising gas prices has had me doing a lot of thinking about energy. About our dependence on petroleum. And I’m starting to wonder if it’s time to give nuclear power another try.

In addition to being incredibly energy-efficient, petroleum is one of the most versatile substances around. That’s not entirely by accident; we’ve literally spent decades finding new uses for it, and ways to use it more efficiently. And what is the most common application? Burning. We take this substance that has all these wonderful uses and instead convert it into foul, toxic, corrosive fumes.

For all the hysteria and scare-mongering, nuclear power has a remarkable safety record in the United States and, for the most part, around the world. In over 60 years of research, development, and application of nuclear power, there has only been a single major incident — and I think we can safely lay Chernobyl at the feet of a corrupt, totalitarian, oppressive, Communist regime. (But I repeat myself a bit there.) Never in the United States or any other nation (such as France or Japan, both heavy users of nuclear power) has there been a disaster anywhere near that magnitude, and (to the best of my knowledge) not a single nuclear power plant mishap has claimed a single life in the United States.

For an even more impressive safety record, look at the United States Navy. By my calculations, the Navy has sent almost 250 reactors to sea in warships over the last 50+ years, and not once has there been a major reactor incident. The Navy is doing something very RIGHT with its plants, and we ought to see about adapting that particular bit of military expertise to civilian use.

Also, there have been tremendous advances in nuclear energy since the United States last really focused on nuclear power. Pebble bed reactors show tremendous potential for safety. Also, the notion of simply standardizing reactor designs, instead of making each a “one-off” unique design like we did in the 60’s and 70’s, could help keep the construction and operation costs more economical.

Nuclear power generation is not some horrible, scary, evil force that threatens the lives of every man, woman, and child on the face of the earth. And they are not run by Homer Simpsons. If we want to truly have affordable energy, we really need to look at building some new reactors.

Or, if you’ll forgive a “crude” metaphor (and a worse pun), we can keep ourselves bent over the barrel.

]]>< ![CDATA[

US Naval reactors, based on easily-found sources online and a copy of Jane’s Fighting Ships, 19-77-78:

Class #vessels Reactors/vessel

Submarines:

Los Angeles 62×1
Ohio 18×1
Seawolf II 03×1
Virginia 01×1
Lafayette 31×1
Ethan Allen 05×1
G. Washington 05×1
Lipscomb 01×1
Narwhal 01×1
Sturgeon 37×1
Thresher 13×1
Tullibee 02×1
Skipjack 05×1
Halibut 01×1
Triton 01×2
Skate 04×1
Seawolf I 01×1
Nautilus 01×1
NR-1 01×1

Total: 194

Cruisers:
Virginia 04×2
California 02×2
Truxtun 01×2
Bainbridge 01×2
Long Beach 01×2
Total: 18

CVNs:
Enterprise 01×8
Nimitz 10×2

Total: 28

Grand Total: 240

(Truxtun and Long Beach added, thanks to jim in the comments. My apologies for overlooking them.)

But will she remember all the little people?
A sign from above?

60 Comments

  1. epador April 25, 2006
  2. CurlyLarryMoe April 25, 2006
  3. MacLachlan April 25, 2006
  4. JohnAnnArbor April 25, 2006
  5. steve April 25, 2006
  6. JohnAnnArbor April 25, 2006
  7. Tim April 25, 2006
  8. Cousin Dave April 25, 2006
  9. ed April 25, 2006
  10. Lee April 25, 2006
  11. Asher Abrams April 25, 2006
  12. stan25 April 25, 2006
  13. kevino April 25, 2006
  14. John Kerry April 25, 2006
  15. jim April 25, 2006
  16. Jay Tea April 25, 2006
  17. Nicholas April 25, 2006
  18. physics geek April 25, 2006
  19. BrianOfAtlanta April 25, 2006
  20. Steve April 25, 2006
  21. Jay Tea April 25, 2006
  22. Harvey April 25, 2006
  23. Lee April 25, 2006
  24. Nicholas April 25, 2006
  25. Ken O'Banion April 25, 2006
  26. ed April 25, 2006
  27. Lee April 25, 2006
  28. Starboard Attitude April 25, 2006
  29. JLawson April 25, 2006
  30. Lee April 25, 2006
  31. Old Coot April 25, 2006
  32. mantis April 25, 2006
  33. docjim505 April 25, 2006
  34. epador April 25, 2006
  35. Chuckg April 25, 2006
  36. wave_man April 25, 2006
  37. SCSIwuzzy April 25, 2006
  38. DJ April 25, 2006
  39. Steve Crickmore April 25, 2006
  40. JLawson April 25, 2006
  41. JLawson April 25, 2006
  42. Dodo David April 25, 2006
  43. JD April 25, 2006
  44. McGehee April 25, 2006
  45. jim April 25, 2006
  46. jim April 25, 2006
  47. DCE April 25, 2006
  48. JLawson April 25, 2006
  49. JLawson April 25, 2006