Marines Decline Body Armor

In January of this year, Hillary Clinton used the body armor issue as an opportunity to criticize President Bush and to score political points:

Jan. 10, 2006 — Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton called the Bush administration “incompetent” when it came to protecting the troops in combat and called the lack of adequate body armor for soldiers and Marines “unforgivable.”

So far in Iraq, more than 2,100 American troops have been killed. Critics like Clinton, D-N.Y., say that many of these deaths are the result of inadequate body armor. A secret Pentagon study of 93 Marines who were killed in Iraq found that 74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders — areas unprotected by the armor most are issued.

“We perhaps could have avoided so many of these fatalities with the right body armor,” said Clinton, who recently wrote letters to Sen. John Warner, R-Va., chairman of the Armed Services Committee; Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee; and Francis J. Harvey, secretary of the Army, calling for an investigation into why troops were not being protected.

Hillary Clinton was so eager to win political points, she didn’t consider what was best for the marines for whom she claimed to speak. Now the body armor is flowing into Iraq, but the majority of the marines see the additional armor as more of a hindrance than a help:

Extra body armor _ the lack of which caused a political storm in the United States _ has flooded in to Iraq, but many Marines here promptly stuck it in lockers or under bunks. Too heavy and cumbersome, many say.

Marines already carry loads as heavy as 70 pounds when they patrol the dangerous streets in towns and villages in restive Anbar province. The new armor plates, while only about five pounds per set, are not worth carrying for the additional safety they are said to provide, some say.

“We have to climb over walls and go through windows,” said Sgt. Justin Shank of Greencastle, Pa. “I understand the more armor, the safer you are. But it makes you slower. People don’t understand that this is combat and people are going to die.”

Staff Sgt. Thomas Bain of Buffalo, N.Y., shared concerns about the extra pounds.

“Before you know it, they’re going to get us injured because we’re hauling too much weight and don’t have enough mobility to maneuver in a fight from house to house,” said Bain, who is assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 6th Marine Regiment. “I think we’re starting to go overboard on the armor.”

Overboard indeed:

Many Marines, however, believe the politics of the issue eventually will make the plates mandatory.

“The reason they issued (the plates), I think, is to make people back home feel better,” said Lance Cpl. Philip Tootle of Reidsville, Ga. “I’m not wishing they wouldn’t have issued them. I’m just wishing that they wouldn’t make them mandatory.”

Hillary Clinton’s focus was on her political career; she didn’t consider the needs of our men and women in the military.

Michelle Malkin addressed Senator Clinton’s body armor political play in her January column.

Non-story Of The Day - Bush Was Set on Path to War
Illegal aliens, French Unionists, and the quotations of Chairman Mao


  1. G March 27, 2006
  2. SCSIwuzzy March 27, 2006
  3. Old Coot March 27, 2006
  4. Tim in PA March 27, 2006
  5. JohnAnnArbor March 27, 2006
  6. bryanD March 27, 2006
  7. Angry Fat Cat March 27, 2006
  8. bryanD March 27, 2006
  9. BrianOfAtlanta March 27, 2006
  10. Angry Fat Cat March 27, 2006
  11. Master Shake March 27, 2006
  12. bryanD March 27, 2006
  13. Synova March 27, 2006
  14. scsiwuzzy March 27, 2006
  15. bryanD March 27, 2006
  16. The Ace March 27, 2006
  17. epador March 28, 2006
  18. Lucas February 11, 2007