We Need To Put An End To Indian Reservations

John J. Miller:

The fallout from the Jack Abramoff corruption scandal has all of Washington atwitter about congressional reform–everything from proposals to restrict travel perks and lunches with lobbyists to a potential shakeup in the Republican House leadership.

A subtheme of the controversy involves not a shakeup but a shakedown–of Indian tribes by Mr. Abramoff, who used casino cash to throw money around town as well as to line his own pockets richly. The common perception is that once again the white man has cheated the red man.

Perhaps a few expressions of sympathy are in order. Yet Indians would benefit much more from their own sweeping reforms. The Abramoff rip-off should be the least of their worries. The time has come to abolish reservations for the good of the people who live on them.

In the American imagination, grinding poverty is often a picture of urban slums full of broken families, abandoned apartments and back-alley drug deals. But an equally valid portrait might focus on the rural squalor of the rez. Of the 10 poorest counties in the U.S., seven of them are contained wholly or largely on reservations in Arizona, North Dakota and South Dakota.

Professional victimologists offer no shortage of explanations for this miserable state of affairs, but most of their analysis boils down to a core grievance: The federal government stole land from the Indians by conquest and treaty. Although Indians once were able to obtain title to specific parcels within reservations, this practice ended in 1934–an act that essentially turned the reservations into not-so-little housing projects on the prairie.

This is something I’ve brought up several times here on Say Anything, both in relation to the Abramoff scandal and Indian casinos. Here in North Dakota I live fairly close to two separate Indian reservations. My job gives me occassion to travel to both several times a year, so I can tell you from personal experience that these communities rival even some of the worst inner-city slums (which I have also observed in New York, Chicago and L.A.) in terms of squalid living conditions and rank criminality. And while that reality is bad enough, it is made all the worse when you see that many of these communities exist within sight of gleaming multi-million dollar gambling establishments. Which is why I’ve said in the past that apart from the Abramoff shenanigans the politicians who took money from Indian gambling interests should be ashamed for accepting contributions from such an exploitive enterprise that clearly isn’t doing a thing to help the people it was intended to.

The reservation system isn’t helping the Indians and neither is the gambling.

Here in North Dakota we have an unemployment rate of just under 3%, which is one of the lowest rates in the nation. Yet on our state’s Indian reservations the unemployment rate is hovering in the mid-sixties. There is no reason for that number to be so high in an economic environment where business are not just calling for workers, but demanding them.

To me, this all indicates one thing: We are doing Indians a grave disservice by keeping them on the reservation. Which isn’t to say that we’re forcing them to say on the reservation, because we aren’t. But we are giving the incentives to stay there along the lines of government entitlement and special priveleges, and that has made the problem worse. The handling of the reservation system to this point has only created a series of isolated communities where dependence on government welfare programs is the rule, not the exception. I just don’t see why that should continue.

You can read more from Rob Port at SayAnythingBlog.com

Carnival of the Trackbacks XLVIII
Gore Blasts New Canadian Prime Minister

89 Comments

  1. teddy January 27, 2006
  2. JohnAnnArbor January 27, 2006
  3. Sitting Amish January 27, 2006
  4. kbiel January 27, 2006
  5. Peter F. January 27, 2006
  6. Indy Voter January 27, 2006
  7. Mrs. Davis January 27, 2006
  8. indolene January 27, 2006
  9. jdavenport January 27, 2006
  10. McGehee January 27, 2006
  11. jdavenport January 28, 2006
  12. jocrazy0 January 28, 2006
  13. Mac Lorry January 28, 2006
  14. Fred Z January 28, 2006
  15. ryan a January 28, 2006
  16. ryan a January 28, 2006
  17. ryan a January 28, 2006
  18. jdavenport January 28, 2006
  19. Lyn January 28, 2006
  20. Mintahoyah January 28, 2006
  21. Mo January 29, 2006
  22. Marlies January 29, 2006
  23. Talwohali January 29, 2006
  24. Kakamaysama January 29, 2006
  25. jdavenport January 29, 2006
  26. Ted Sojka January 29, 2006
  27. ryan a January 29, 2006
  28. fbickel January 29, 2006
  29. ryan a January 29, 2006
  30. Joelle Clark January 29, 2006
  31. Mac Lorry January 29, 2006
  32. Jeanne January 29, 2006
  33. mo January 29, 2006
  34. Mac Lorry January 29, 2006
  35. Mac Lorry January 29, 2006
  36. ryan a January 29, 2006
  37. ryan a January 29, 2006
  38. mo January 29, 2006
  39. Mac Lorry January 29, 2006
  40. Nancy January 29, 2006
  41. Nancy January 29, 2006
  42. T. Lee January 29, 2006
  43. Mac Lorry January 30, 2006
  44. mo January 30, 2006
  45. ryan a January 30, 2006
  46. ryan a January 30, 2006
  47. Mac Lorry January 30, 2006
  48. Squire January 30, 2006
  49. mo January 30, 2006
  50. Mac Lorry January 30, 2006