Throwing the Book at Cardinal Bertone

Last week, Catholic Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone urged Catholics to not read “The Da Vinci Code,” saying it was full of “cheap lies” and that it aims to “discredit the Church and its history.” Cardinal Bertone is a close friend and advisor to the Pope.

Now, I’ve read “The Da Vinci Code.” Maybe it’s because I’m not Catholic, but I didn’t see what the big deal was. It was OK, but nothing to write home about. I’ve read a couple other Biblicly-themed thrillers (Richard Ben Sapir’s “The Body” and Warren Murphy’s “Quest,” to name a couple ones I particularly enjoyed), but I didn’t see the big deal.

But if Cardinal Bertone wants to extend his authority from Catholic theology to literary criticism, I suggest he turn his gaze first to his own organization’s primary publication — the Bible. There are a few things in there that could use a little attention and clarification, if not outright correction.

(Author’s note: at this point, this piece could very well veer into Catholic-bashing, and even general Christian-bashing. In fact, it most likely will. With that in mind, I’m going to stuff it in the extended section, so readers who would rather not see it can easily avoid it.)

]]>< ![CDATA[

First off, Cardinal, let’s look at the Book of Exodus. In particular, Exodus 22:18: “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.” Later scholars have pretty much agreed that “witch” was a mistranslation; it should have been “poisoner.” Now, killing poisoners is something most of us can agree on. But would you care to retract that, and issue some kind of apology or pardon for all those “witches” who have been tortured or killed over the centuries in the name of this verse? I think the only people who would be upset would be a few merchants in Salem, Massachusetts, who make a good living off the city’s historical witch trials.

Secondly, let’s look at the Song of Songs (also known as the Song Of Solomon). Chapter 7, Verse 2 reads “Your navel is a rounded bowl that never lacks mixed wine. Your belly is a heap of wheat, encircled with lilies.”

Now, I’ve read that in ancient Hebrew, vowels were omitted from written versions. And further, the words for “navel” and “vagina” are indistinguishable when written, as they differ only in their vowels. Which body part do you think is more likely to referred to by a lover as “a rounded bowl that never lacks mixed wine?” I tell ya, if MY lover had a navel that produced liquids, I’d rush her to the hospital.

Finally, Cardinal, let’s look at the New Testament. Both the Gospels of Matthew and Luke give the lineage of Jesus (Matthew 1:1-16, Luke 3:23-38). Matthew traces Jesus from Joseph through King David back to Abraham, while Luke goes all the way back to Adam. But here’s the odd part: in the middle, they don’t agree. (PDF of Excel spreadsheet Download file“>here.) Which is correct, or somehow are they both correct?

Cardinal, when you can answer these questions about your own book, then I’ll listen to your criticisms of others — especially since “The Da Vinci Code” is labeled as fiction, while yours is plugged as “the infallible word of God.”


Answering The Gullible
Talking Points Memogate


  1. Faith+1 March 24, 2005
  2. wavemaker March 24, 2005
  3. George March 24, 2005
  4. -S- March 24, 2005
  5. -S- March 24, 2005
  6. -S- March 24, 2005
  7. Sean March 24, 2005
  8. julie March 24, 2005
  9. julie March 24, 2005
  10. Melissa March 24, 2005
  11. Henry March 24, 2005
  12. Henry March 24, 2005
  13. Drew March 24, 2005
  14. Henry March 24, 2005
  15. Kabuzz52 March 24, 2005
  16. Samwise March 24, 2005
  17. Sean March 24, 2005
  18. Just Me March 24, 2005
  19. liberty March 24, 2005
  20. Jay Tea March 24, 2005
  21. Jack Tanner March 24, 2005
  22. Rightwingsparkle March 24, 2005
  23. Darby March 24, 2005
  24. Jim March 24, 2005
  25. Sean March 24, 2005
  26. andy March 24, 2005
  27. Cantankerous Callinectes March 24, 2005
  28. Just Me March 24, 2005
  29. Amelia March 24, 2005
  30. Aaron March 24, 2005
  31. Just Me March 24, 2005
  32. julie March 24, 2005
  33. -S- March 24, 2005
  34. Red Five March 25, 2005
  35. Winston March 25, 2005
  36. Winston March 25, 2005
  37. Jordan March 25, 2005
  38. Jordan March 25, 2005
  39. Just Me March 25, 2005