Clear and Convincing Evidence

I’ve been looking around for the laws that might apply in the Terri Schiavo case and I’ve come up pretty empty. Whether that’s by design, or not, I don’t know.

This article by Chris Tisch in the St. Petersburg Times does a pretty good job of documenting how “right-to-die” precedents have evolved over the years. It’s worth noting that the “law” as it operates in the case of Terri Schiavo has been crafted entirely by the judiciary. Talk about judicial activism! In this case, however, it appears that the courts have imposed the standards for removal of life support because legislatures would not act.

In the only “right-to-die” case ever heard by The U.S. Supreme Court they ruled that families did not have an automatic right to insist that hospital workers stop feeding their relative. The court however indicated that the feeding tube could be removed if they proved by “clear and convincing evidence” that the patient had previously indicated that they would not want such treatment. The court affirmed that an incapacitated person whose wishes were clearly known could have their treatment ended.

Regardless of moralizing about Terri Schiavo, the entire case comes down to the “clear and convincing evidence” standard. Only one judge has ever viewed and ruled on that evidence (Michael Schiavo’s disputed contention that he remembered Terri saying she wouldn’t want to be kept alive on life support) – Judge George Greer, who ironically is legally blind.

Ann Coulter, on that ruling, notes:

…moreover, it’s not as if court after court has heard testimony on Terri’s wishes and have all unanimously agreed that Terri would have chosen death. One lone Florida circuit court judge, George Greer, credited Michael’s testimony, finding “clear and convincing” evidence that Terri said she would not want to be kept alive on feeding tubes. Because Judge Greer was acting as the finder of fact, his finding is essentially unreviewable by any other court. Even the notorious Florida Supreme Court – which has a history of jumping in to try to save a dead man – refused to review the case.

Judge Greer’s finding on Terri’s wishes may be immune from legal review, but it’s not immune from criticism. He’s a finder of fact – he’s not God. A few years ago, Judge Greer found that Helene Ball McGee did not have reasonable cause to believe domestic violence was imminent and denied her an order of protection. Two weeks later, Mrs. McGee was stabbed to death by her husband. So judges can make mistakes.

Judge Greer’s pivotal “finding of fact” in the Schiavo case determining a life-or-death issue is based on something Terri allegedly said after watching a TV show. Michael didn’t know his wife was bulimic, but he distinctly remembered Terri’s remarks about a TV show. (It was an episode of “Melrose Place,” during which she said that Heather Locklear’s shoes were “to die for.”)Given all the acrimony about how and when Michael Schiavo had this “revelation” in the course of the protracted legal battles it certainly seems that a review by a fresh set of judicial eyes on the ALL of the facts surrounding Terri’s wishes (or lack thereof) with regards to the “clear and convincing evidence” standard is warranted. From the looks of it, that’s what the bill President Bush is expected to sign provides for.

Note: If this doesn’t convince you of the worth of a living will, nothing will.

The stark calculus of war
If you can't screw over your buddies, who can you screw over?


  1. Just Me March 20, 2005
  2. wavemaker March 20, 2005
  3. Bill March 20, 2005
  4. steve sturm March 20, 2005
  5. steve sturm March 20, 2005
  6. Just Me March 20, 2005
  7. GC March 20, 2005
  8. Palmateer March 20, 2005
  9. AnonymousDrivel March 20, 2005
  10. AnonymousDrivel March 20, 2005
  11. wavemaker March 20, 2005
  12. Julie March 20, 2005
  13. been there March 20, 2005
  14. Cao March 20, 2005
  15. CNB March 20, 2005
  16. Cao March 20, 2005
  17. Cao March 20, 2005
  18. Julie March 20, 2005
  19. AnonymousDrivel March 20, 2005
  20. Julie March 20, 2005
  21. Just Me March 20, 2005
  22. Jon March 20, 2005
  23. Steve J. March 20, 2005
  24. Steve J. March 20, 2005
  25. Steve J. March 20, 2005
  26. Steve J. March 20, 2005
  27. Steve J. March 20, 2005
  28. Julie March 20, 2005
  29. Just Me March 20, 2005
  30. Cao March 20, 2005
  31. Julie March 20, 2005
  32. Julie March 20, 2005
  33. CNB March 20, 2005
  34. mantis March 20, 2005
  35. wavemaker March 20, 2005
  36. Brian March 20, 2005
  37. Brian March 20, 2005
  38. AnonymousDrivel March 20, 2005
  39. AnonymousDrivel March 20, 2005
  40. brett March 20, 2005
  41. Julie March 20, 2005
  42. Julie March 20, 2005
  43. CNB March 20, 2005
  44. AnonymousDrivel March 20, 2005
  45. JImmie March 20, 2005
  46. AnonymousDrivel March 20, 2005
  47. Sue Dohnim March 20, 2005
  48. Julie March 20, 2005
  49. Just Me March 20, 2005
  50. mantis March 20, 2005