HomeMiscellaneousOhio GOP Babes 4 Bush Ohio GOP Babes 4 Bush Kevin September 28, 2004 Miscellaneous 27 Comments Update: Others (InstaPundit, Powerline) take the road more travelled. [Ed – Careful visual inspection indicates that it is a closeup of the girl second from the left in the picture above] Flavia Colgan Defends Kerry Great News from the Middle-East Related Posts My Cup Runneth Over Underwater Homeowners or Just Spoiled Homeowners? Winning Tonight’s $550 Million Dollar Powerball Won’t Make Make You Any Happier About The Author Kevin Kevin founded Wizbang in 2003. He still contributes occasionally and handles all the technical and design work for the site. 27 Comments Leopold Stotch September 28, 2004 Three of the four look totally inbred. David Anderson September 28, 2004 I was trying to figure out what it was and couldnt quite put my finger on it. LMAO! Sean Hackbarth September 28, 2004 The picture must be from southern Ohio. joe September 28, 2004 It looks like they have pictures of coat hangers on their shirts. KiwiJames September 28, 2004 Well if your going to have a slogans like that on T shirts you would want the girls to actually be babes and it would help if they filled out the T shirts in the right places! Russ September 28, 2004 Now, now. Play nice. They obviously support the President… assuming they can read what’s on their shirts. 😉 LF September 28, 2004 I’d be curious to know if we’d all agree on which is the non-inbred one, or if we’d all pick different girls. Don’t they say that inbred is in the eye of the beholder? But we all agree the one on the left is definitely inbred. Don’t we? KiwiJames September 28, 2004 Yes the one on left is inbred and carrying a spare tyre around her middle…… perhaps they should have weight restrictions before they hand out the T shirts…. ohh! I can see the headline now…. “Bush says “No Fat Girls”…. he would loose 50% of the votes on that one Sean Hackbarth September 28, 2004 The second from the right is the non-in-bred. I’ll bet a date with Terri Hatcher on it. 😉 Nathan September 28, 2004 Well, my first thought was, “Ewww!”, but my second thought was: with the size disparity of the head to the body of the one on our far left, it seems likely that there’s a lens-/-distance distortion problem going on. Maybe they’d all be extremely cute in person… KiwiJames September 28, 2004 How about this slogan… Gut Busters For Bush ???? Rob September 28, 2004 Inbred? Hell, I think there all pretty hot. Of course, I’m from North Dakota so… Seriously though. They’re not that bad. Sean Hackbarth September 28, 2004 They’re not that good either. David Anderson September 28, 2004 Ewwwww Rob, your Costa Rica babe hunting priveledges have been suspended! Not Bad… Try Horrible. MahaRichie September 29, 2004 Who designed the “amateurish and inane”tee shirt’s? Oh No! Pantyhead, are you behind this abomination? Pete September 29, 2004 Allow me to insult a lot of people. Every time I see a blog comment thread where guys jank on moderately attractive girls, I’m reminded of a Fark cliche: Studman69 …I’m just sayin’… LF September 29, 2004 I agree Pete. And they all have really, really great personalities. Mad William Flint September 29, 2004 Nope. 2nd from the right is actually a cutie. The rest of them are just on the good side of ok, with one obvious exception. LargeBill September 29, 2004 Come on guys. They’re kids. They will fill out the shirts in the years to follow. How many of us have gone to a HS reunion and seen a girl we paid no attention to who has since matured into a woman? Sharp as a Marble September 29, 2004 As a professional photographer, I’d say there is a little lens distortion on the chick on the left. And DA, ain’t nothin’ prettier than the Ticas. My wife thinks I want to go back for the scuba 😉 Lune September 29, 2004 “Three of the four look totally inbred.” They look like average folks to me (I have lived everywhere from TX to CA and now MD). I am sick of the synthetic Hollywood image being the standard for everyone else, but asking for that to change would be like asking some people to grow a brain. Harvey September 29, 2004 The girls on the end would probably look better if they wore their hair down. And they may be a little on the “comfy-looking” side, but part of that is those stupid hip-hugger pants, which NO human female has a flat enough tummy to look good in. Also consider they’ve been standing out in the sun for hours, and their make-up is no longer fresh. I’m sure they clean up real nice. bonnieb September 29, 2004 To the gentlemen that made nice comments, thank you! To the rest of you men…. you should be ashamed of yourselves. Thank God we have young women taking a political stand on the right side of things. If these were teenage boys in tee shirts you wouldn’t pick them apart over their looks. I have a daughter about the age of these girls and I would be highly offended if she was subjected to this very unkind criticism and she would be crushed. Talk about wounding young delicate egos. Come on guys…. Joe Grossberg September 29, 2004 Whatever bonnie. If you refer to yourself as a “babe”, then you’re open to criticism. If it was four guys wearing “studs for bush” t-shirts, you bet their looks would be critically assessed. MahaRichie September 29, 2004 I am truly amazed at the length of the arms of the lady 2nd. from the right. McCain September 30, 2004 Look, we are the ones who gave women the vote. We only have ourselves to blame for this carnage. brazilian wax :) October 3, 2004 “Babes 4 Bush”? I guess these chicks are anti wax then. Oh, you mean that american president guy?!