It's been rather entertaining, watching how amidst the ongoing catastrophe in the Gulf, so many on the left are eagerly shoving BP on to the right. After all, they're Big Oil, and so many Republicans are part and parcel of Big Oil. And, more generally, they're Big Business, which is usually viewed as more conservative.
Oddly enough, that doesn't really hold up to scrutiny.
A few years ago, BP decided to simplify its name and drop the "_ritish _etroleum." Then, it started "going green" by saying how the new, meaningless letters actually stood for "Beyond Petroleum." They were selling themselves as the "green energy" company. They championed the "Cap And Trade" move that promises to drive energy costs through the roof. They have an army of Democratic activists and operatives and apparatchiks on their payroll. White House Chief of Staff previously lived for five years, rent-free, in a home owned by a BP adviser. The majority of BP's political donations have gone to Democrats -- the largest recipient being President Obama himself.
In brief, BP hedged its bets somewhat, but came down quite firmly on the side of the Democrats.
So, in light of that, do I wish to withdraw my previous "defenses" of BP?
Hell, no.
BP's political leanings are utterly irrelevant to the situation at hand. The oil gushing into the Gulf knows no party affiliation. The only reason to try to hang the disaster on one party or another is for political gain -- and we simply don't have time for bullshit games like that.
When the oil is stopped, when the cleanup has begun, when steps have been taken to prevent future such catastrophes, then we can look into the blame game. And at that point, all those Democrats who were so eager to accept BP's money and champion their legislation can explain to their constituents how there was absolutely no connection between the two.
In the meantime, the only reason to even discuss the matter is to shut up those who are working so desperately to make this a "Republican disaster."
Partly because they know that the actual responsibility is far more bipartisan and nonpartisan than their simple knee-jerk "blame Bush" reactions to everything.
And partly because it reveals that they have absolutely no fucking clue on what else to do. That they have no idea how to handle a real crisis, so they instead stick to what they do know: political bickering and partisan gamesmanship.
There is a point when doing so in the face of real danger constitutes treason...



Comments (12)
Will someone man up and plu... (Below threshold)1. Posted by 914 | June 24, 2010 3:15 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Will someone man up and plugg that hole? What profiteth a fool to takeover the free world and lose his soul?
Well Barry, we await your response.
1. Posted by 914 | June 24, 2010 3:15 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 15:15
2. Posted by JLawson | June 24, 2010 3:48 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
"And partly because it reveals that they have absolutely no fucking clue on what else to do. That they have no idea how to handle a real crisis, so they instead stick to what they do know: political bickering and partisan gamesmanship."
It's served them well in the past - 'well' meaning they've managed to get into office on promises they had little intention of keeping, and when actually pressed to 'do' something ended up with solutions that cost more than the problems they were supposed to solve.
It would be interesting to see a breakdown by party of how many politicians are lawyers. For some reason, I'm thinking there's a lot more Democrats than Republicans, since Dems seem to believe that words are all that matters, as opposed to actual results.
2. Posted by JLawson | June 24, 2010 3:48 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 15:48
3. Posted by Jim Addison | June 24, 2010 3:56 PM | Score: 6 (12 votes cast)
I understand that the batship crazy moonbats have been trying to blame Bush, and the moderate-batship-crazy moonbats in the Administration tried to run it up the flagpole a few times to see if it was sparkly enough to distract the attention of the legacy media, but it never got close to catching on.
People have wised up. The idiot in the empty suit is a whiny little weasel who loves blaming others for his problems. The only thing he excels at is admiring himself in mirrors; he doesn't even give a good speech anymore.
Oh, sure, the faithful Komsomól cadres like the jester you keep around here will keep parroting the meme, but no one has paid them any mind in years.
Concerning BP, I will be most interested in seeing the history of the inspection waivers they received from the Obama Administration, and also why the 1994 emergency containment plan wasn't immediately implemented. Oh, drat! That will definitely require subpoena powers to get answers from "the most transparent Administration EVAH" - guess it will have to wait until January, mmmkay?
3. Posted by Jim Addison | June 24, 2010 3:56 PM |
Score: 6 (12 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 15:56
4. Posted by retired military | June 24, 2010 4:10 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
914
"Well Barry, we await your response."
You cant lose what was sold years ago.
4. Posted by retired military | June 24, 2010 4:10 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 16:10
5. Posted by 914 | June 24, 2010 4:47 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
"the largest recipient being President Obama himself"
Give Barry an inch, he takes a mile.
5. Posted by 914 | June 24, 2010 4:47 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 16:47
6. Posted by Neo | June 24, 2010 5:22 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
The majority of BP's political donations have gone to Democrats -- the largest recipient being President Obama himself.
A lot of good those donations did.
6. Posted by Neo | June 24, 2010 5:22 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 17:22
7. Posted by Neo | June 24, 2010 5:25 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Q. Let's say you're advising BP. What would you tell them to do?
A. I'd advise them to explore the option of bankruptcy. I only know BP from public information. BP has a lot of cash and the ability to generate huge amounts of cash. But remember, just because BP can pay claims doesn't mean they should, or that they will, given that their primary obligation is to their shareholders.
7. Posted by Neo | June 24, 2010 5:25 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 17:25
8. Posted by hcddbz | June 24, 2010 7:28 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Jay,
I had this discussion two weeks ago in on Business trip. We were having dinner and team member from Canada started talking about the spill and how horrible BP was and that since they were an Oil Company it must be GW Bush fault cause he was so tight with Big Oil.
At which point a pointed out BP contributed more money to BHO campaign than anyone person in history.
That BHO administration approved the drilling.
That BHO admin waived the spill assessment .
That BHO did not have ships and equipment to contain the spill.
His response was really? We thought this was all under Bush and BHO was cleaning up.
Then another college was well Bush was dumb and MMS was bad.
At wich pint I said we had spills under Bush and they were contained so so let look at what BHO is doing now.
8. Posted by hcddbz | June 24, 2010 7:28 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 19:28
9. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | June 24, 2010 7:46 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Somewhere on the net this morning I was reading about how Vanguard sold its holding just a few days before the blowout. The article went on to say Obama owns a lot of Vanguard and the government knew of the problems with the well in February. They could have ordered them to stop drilling which would have prevents the incident. However that is not the case. It gets interesting when one finds out Vanguard then invested in Petro-Bra. A Brazilian company drilling in deep water of the coast of Brazil. The Government lent them 2 billion of our tax dollars. George Soros is heavily invested too. Funny, they needed drill rigs and with a moratorium in place 33 rigs would be freed up. I wonder what an independent investigator would find.
9. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | June 24, 2010 7:46 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 19:46
10. Posted by epador | June 24, 2010 8:50 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
I thought this was all going to be about a vegetarian massage therapist from Portland with stained Spandex pants.
10. Posted by epador | June 24, 2010 8:50 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 20:50
11. Posted by Jay Guevara | June 24, 2010 10:14 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Standards have really eroded. Politicians who were bought used to stay bought.
But seriously, why does any company donate to Barry & Co.? If the chips are down, he'll throw you under the bus. If they're not down...well, don't need him anyway.
11. Posted by Jay Guevara | June 24, 2010 10:14 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on June 24, 2010 22:14
12. Posted by Jett | June 25, 2010 12:45 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hold on, BP's politics say everything about its exploitative and down-right ignorant corporate culture, which was also driving the Macondo bus that crashed in the GOM. They thought working the pols would somehow be better than working their jobs with skill and responsibility--classic progressive/demoncrat thinking. Better companies are guided by the profit motive, which recognizes spending a little overhead to avoid catastrophic losses is good business. Prob'ly why BP owns the only catastrophic deep water blow-out in the GOM. Don't be an idjit.
12. Posted by Jett | June 25, 2010 12:45 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 25, 2010 12:45