Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's comments about American business during the health care debate could fill a thesaurus of inanity. Just last week, while the Majority Leader was appearing as a witness before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Reid told this whopper:
As for insurance companies, "There isn't anything we could do to satisfy them in this health care bill. Nothing," Reid said. "They are so anti-competitive. Why? Because they make more money than any other business in America today... What a sweet deal they have."
It is uninformed, moronic demagoguery such as this that passes for debate in the world's greatest deliberative body. The dumbing down of the healthcare polemic has had many low points (according to its proponents it is "defecit neutral", it will lower business costs, and it will eliminate wasteful spending) that simply require the suspension of disbelief. In a refreshing moment of real fact checking, the AP's Calvin Woodward" laid the wood to Reid's brazen dishonesty about the profitability of U S healthcare insurers:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Quick quiz: What do these enterprises have in common? Farm and construction machinery, Tupperware, the railroads, Hershey sweets, Yum food brands and Yahoo? Answer: They're all more profitable than the health insurance industry.In the health care debate, Democrats and their allies have gone after insurance companies as rapacious profiteers making "immoral" and "obscene" returns while "the bodies pile up."
Ledgers tell a different reality. Health insurance profit margins typically run about 6 percent, give or take a point or two. That's anemic compared with other forms of insurance and a broad array of industries, even some beleaguered ones.
The latest annual profit margins of a selection of products, services and industries: Tupperware Brands, 7.5 percent; Yahoo, 5.9 percent; Hershey, 6.1 percent; Clorox, 8.7 percent; Molson Coors Brewing, 8.1 percent; construction and farm machinery, 5 percent; Yum Brands (think KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell), 8.5 percent.
If the Senate leaders attempting to ram ObamaCare through the Congress are telling easily disproved lies such as this one must wonder about the real whoppers yet to be unearthed in the still unreleased released bill?
Update: You can't make this stuff up. Jim Hoft notes that Congressional raises topped insurance industry profit increases last year.



Comments (9)
About ninety per cent of th... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Eneils Bailey | October 25, 2009 6:29 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
About ninety per cent of the time after Harry Reid says anything, I always hear kazoo music followed by a rim shot.
As with the above statement, he seems to utter some of the most absurd statements concerning the economy and governance. The mind is quickly shunted to digesting his remarks as very poor comedy.
He is a pitiful creature who projects absolutely no leadership presence or common sense.
It will be nice when he heads out to pasture next year.
1. Posted by Eneils Bailey | October 25, 2009 6:29 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2009 18:29
2. Posted by kathie | October 25, 2009 6:48 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The truth about Health Care in America is that it is very good and most, the majority of people who shop carefully for Insurance get it at a good price and are happy. So to change the whole system the dems have to tell one lie after another to fool people into believing we should throw the whole system out and start over.
If individuals could take a tax deduction in the amount of their health care policy or some portion of it and others could get subsidized, how simple would that be. People with pre-existing conditions could get a bigger tax credit or subsidy, it would solve alot of problems. First it would encourage people to buy their own insurance, so moving jobs is a non-issue. Buy across state borders, and tort reform would help tons. Let's do the easy things and see how it works. Then we can stop lying.
2. Posted by kathie | October 25, 2009 6:48 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2009 18:48
3. Posted by Victory is Ours | October 25, 2009 6:50 PM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
No, you can make this stuff up - by using misleading statistics and reporting percentages, not dollars.
And I guess if you repeat a lie often enough someone might believe it.
From the comment thread at the link above:
Billions upon billions - that's a huge profit.
Compare the profits in dollar terms instead of percentages, and then tell me that $4.5 BILLION in profit for 2007 isn't obscene.
Vic
3. Posted by Victory is Ours | October 25, 2009 6:50 PM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2009 18:50
4. Posted by JLawson | October 25, 2009 7:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So it's far better to give billions upon billions to the government, to provide a crappy level of care for all, right?
4. Posted by JLawson | October 25, 2009 7:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2009 19:09
5. Posted by Victory is Ours | October 25, 2009 7:16 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Whatever - but if you want to talk profits - talk dollars, not profit margins.
One health insurance company - one year - $4.5 BILLION in profits.
"It is uninformed, moronic demagoguery such as this that passes for debate in the world's greatest deliberative body. The dumbing down of the healthcare polemic has had many low points..."
To which, thanks to HughS, you can now add discussing profits without mentioning the dollar amounts!
Uninformed demagoguery indeed.
Vic
5. Posted by Victory is Ours | October 25, 2009 7:16 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2009 19:16
6. Posted by iwogisdead | October 25, 2009 7:20 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Victory is Ours wrote:
And I guess if you repeat a lie often enough someone might believe it.
Does the concept of "projection" mean anything to this person?
Perhaps he has a perception problem, since he links to a thread in which his claims have been completely discredited--not the type of thing a smart person would call attention to.
6. Posted by iwogisdead | October 25, 2009 7:20 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2009 19:20
7. Posted by HughS | October 25, 2009 7:25 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Vic
If you were really concerned about obscene profits (which you are not) you would be attacking the Wall Street investment firms and hedge funds that contributed record amounts to Obama, during a recession. (All the while recording what in your definition were obscene profits.)
Nope, your just another demagogue. Help yourself to some more rope....
7. Posted by HughS | October 25, 2009 7:25 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2009 19:25
8. Posted by GarandFan | October 25, 2009 7:31 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
"No, you can make this stuff up - by using misleading statistics and reporting percentages, not dollars."
VIC you are so full of crap it's pathetic. If all comparisons are based on the same formula, it's apples and apples.
So take your freaking bullshit and park it over at Daily Kos.
8. Posted by GarandFan | October 25, 2009 7:31 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2009 19:31
9. Posted by Victory is Ours | October 25, 2009 7:46 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Apples to apples? Cherry pick your parameters and you can make statistics say whatever you want.
Compare dollars to dollars, since nobody spends "percentages" - and you'll find that $4.5Billion in profits for one year alone - and that's obscene.
Feel free to compare dollars to dollars. Let's pick a company with a similar percentage profit - how about Hershey's at 6.1%
They both earned about 6% profit in 2007.
Hershey's 6% Profit in 2007 - $559 Million
UnitedHealth's 6% profit in 2007 - $4.5 Billion
UnitedHealth's profits were almost 800% higher than Hershey's -- but their profit margins were the same.
And you say you're comparing apples to apples?
Demagoguery indeed.
Vic
9. Posted by Victory is Ours | October 25, 2009 7:46 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2009 19:46