Permalink | Linking Blogs | Sphere: Related Content | Digg this! | FARK It!
Filed under:
Asshats
« The Audacity of Disagreement | Main | The Fed at The Crossroads »
Why is Anita Dunn still the White House Communications Director?
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/37099.
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why is Anita Dunn still the White House Communications Director?:
» Brutally Honest linked with Why is Anita Dunn still the White House Communications Director?
Comment Preview
Advertisements
Search
Follow Wizbang
Contact
Send e-mail tips to us:
Subscribe Via E-Mail
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
Fresh Links
The Wizbang® Network
Credits
Section Editor: Maggie Whitton
Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert
Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port
In Memorium: HughS
All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.
Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361
Hosting by ServInt
Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.
Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.
Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.
Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.
Comments (24)
Becuase just like ADOLPH HI... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Flu-Bird | October 22, 2009 10:41 AM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Becuase just like ADOLPH HITLER our dicttator BARACK OBAMA depends on the finest propeganda artists ever and their little difference between ANITA DUNN and JOSEPH GOBBELS
1. Posted by Flu-Bird | October 22, 2009 10:41 AM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 10:41
2. Posted by Phil | October 22, 2009 10:42 AM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
This picture pretty much sums it up:
http://tinyurl.com/ygepwt3
2. Posted by Phil | October 22, 2009 10:42 AM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 10:42
3. Posted by Matt | October 22, 2009 10:43 AM | Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
I never really pictured Mao Zedong as a political philosopher. I do see him as a very succesful insurgency leader and a very succesful dictator/tyrant though... May he rot in the very depths of Hell.
3. Posted by Matt | October 22, 2009 10:43 AM |
Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 10:43
4. Posted by jim m | October 22, 2009 10:45 AM | Score: 6 (8 votes cast)
As I have said all along it's about ideology and ideology trumps everything else for Obama. Dunn has the correct (ie Communist) ideology.
4. Posted by jim m | October 22, 2009 10:45 AM |
Score: 6 (8 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 10:45
5. Posted by Victory is Mao's | October 22, 2009 10:48 AM | Score: -2 (10 votes cast)
Pull the trigger! Pull the trigger!
5. Posted by Victory is Mao's | October 22, 2009 10:48 AM |
Score: -2 (10 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 10:48
6. Posted by Justrand
| October 22, 2009 10:49 AM | Score: 6 (8 votes cast)
big difference between Conservatives and Leftists: we don't want ANYONE to have, let alone exercise the kind of media control the Obama Regime is exercising. and the media is LINING up (except Fox) for the "privilege" of doing his bidding.
A pat on the head from Gibbs & Dunn is the reward they seek.
During Bush's years the media was opnely hostile to him. Too histile, IMHO. But at least they were doing their "watchdog" role.
Now the ONLY media outlet trying to ask real questions of the Obama Regime is the media outlet they are seeking to destroy. Naturally.
6. Posted by Justrand
| October 22, 2009 10:49 AM |
Score: 6 (8 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 10:49
7. Posted by Hank | October 22, 2009 11:03 AM | Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
Dunn is still Communications Director because she has done a great job controlling the MSM.
She hasn't had much luck with Fox, but that is being worked on.
No matter what she says, she's not going anywhere.
7. Posted by Hank | October 22, 2009 11:03 AM |
Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 11:03
8. Posted by G. | October 22, 2009 12:25 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
May he and Adolph and Che exchange rectal pineapples in hell...frequently.
8. Posted by G. | October 22, 2009 12:25 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 12:25
9. Posted by jim m | October 22, 2009 12:25 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
The media won't confront the administration because they are all waiting for approval of tax exempt status and shortly thereafter federal subsidies for their declining operations.
9. Posted by jim m | October 22, 2009 12:25 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 12:25
10. Posted by Flu--Bird | October 22, 2009 12:39 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Anitna Dunn and Joe gobbels propeganda artists theres very little difference
10. Posted by Flu--Bird | October 22, 2009 12:39 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 12:39
11. Posted by _Mike_ | October 22, 2009 12:52 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
re: jim m
Obama's used the 'carrot' (i.e. access) for ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN/etc. However, that hasn't worked with Fox News so Obama is now attempting to employ the 'stick'.
11. Posted by _Mike_ | October 22, 2009 12:52 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 12:52
12. Posted by jim m | October 22, 2009 1:23 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
_Mike_
That's because Fox actually has viewership and therefore can get a decent price for advertising. The other 'real' news orgs don't have that and are all dieing. They desperately need a bailout from the government. Plus they buy into the socialist agenda that Obama is trying to enact. They are willing to overlook all sorts of breeches of liberty and civil rights in order to achieve that goal.
12. Posted by jim m | October 22, 2009 1:23 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 13:23
13. Posted by 914 | October 22, 2009 1:28 PM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Looks more like Hillary.
13. Posted by 914 | October 22, 2009 1:28 PM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 13:28
14. Posted by G Marshall | October 22, 2009 3:52 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
The best part of Anita's speech was her excuse that the Mao comment was supposed to be a joke. Someone please tell her not to try out for a job as a stand up comedian please!
14. Posted by G Marshall | October 22, 2009 3:52 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 15:52
15. Posted by Gayle Miller | October 22, 2009 4:28 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
She is a shameless huckster for the worst elements of 20th century tyranny! Why isn't she gone? Because George Soros wants her there. Let's be real - he's our ACTUAL president and make no mistake, he'll hang onto the power he wields through his little hand puppet with the big ears as long as he possible can!
15. Posted by Gayle Miller | October 22, 2009 4:28 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 16:28
16. Posted by Matt | October 22, 2009 4:48 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Because George Soros wants her there. Let's be real - he's our ACTUAL president
You are absolutely correct!!
16. Posted by Matt | October 22, 2009 4:48 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 16:48
17. Posted by GarandFan | October 22, 2009 7:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Democratic Play Book: "When caught with your foot in your mouth (by telling the truth), just reply "IT WAS A JOKE". Odd, she wasn't laughing at the time. Doesn't one laugh at a joke?
17. Posted by GarandFan | October 22, 2009 7:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 19:08
18. Posted by Marc | October 22, 2009 8:50 PM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Meanwhile, the "boycott" of Fox has turned into an epic fail as the other "more newsy" news networks, as opposed to Fox this not a news network, refused to participate unless Fox was part of an interview of pay czar Ken Feinberg
Guess the lame stream media has an idea they ARE NEXT
18. Posted by Marc | October 22, 2009 8:50 PM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 20:50
19. Posted by John | October 22, 2009 9:50 PM | Score: -3 (5 votes cast)
Why is Anita Dunn still the White House Communications Director?
Because those in charge of that decision actually listened to her entire quote, and can see that the right is distorting what she said.
19. Posted by John | October 22, 2009 9:50 PM |
Score: -3 (5 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 21:50
20. Posted by jim m | October 22, 2009 10:21 PM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
John -
It's not that the right are distorting her position. She made a clear statement and I have heard the extended video of the speech and she is holding up a man who murdered 70 million people as someone to admire for his thinking. If she had merely quoted him it would be one thing, but she extolled him as one of her favorite philosophers.
She maintains her position because her love of Mao is completely mainstream within the current White House.
20. Posted by jim m | October 22, 2009 10:21 PM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 22:21
21. Posted by Trajan | October 22, 2009 10:23 PM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Why is the sky blue? Why is Sandy Berger un-
scathed by his crime? Why is fat-ass Hillary
being reborn before our eyes? Why does a
vapid fop like Obama keep up the 'tude and
be praised daily on most networks? How can
the country accept the payout of taxpayers
resurrecting the evil big boys on Wall Street
that were defamed just months ago? Obama
is the puppet on the chain. Someone has to
trace the chain, link by link...before the
White House shouts "treason" and stifles
ALL dissent. If the country doesn't unite
against this cabal in the next 6 months,
this country is LOST.
21. Posted by Trajan | October 22, 2009 10:23 PM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 22:23
22. Posted by John | October 22, 2009 11:34 PM | Score: -2 (2 votes cast)
but she extolled him as one of her favorite philosophers.
As she did with Mother Teresa in the same comment. And since neither were political philosophers, it should be pretty obvious to anyone not fishing for a "gotcha!" moment that she was being facetious.
22. Posted by John | October 22, 2009 11:34 PM |
Score: -2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 23:34
23. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | October 23, 2009 9:26 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
John,
Couldn't it just be that she is a poseur? An idiot?
23. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | October 23, 2009 9:26 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2009 09:26
24. Posted by Mitchell | October 24, 2009 5:39 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yes, SCSI, and John likes and supports idiots. It's what the Left does. They were useful idiots for the Soviet Union and all of the stuff that ends up in the waste bin of history. It sucks to have no clue.
24. Posted by Mitchell | October 24, 2009 5:39 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 24, 2009 05:39