When it comes to matters of faith, I've often proclaimed myself a "born-again agnostic." I don't hold to any particular faith, but I don't have problems with those that do. I don't care for and don't quite "get" the in-your-face anti-religious crowd, and -- while I am far closer to their beliefs than the religious -- I think they're -- in a word -- assholes.
That's why these people sound pretty cool to me.
If it wasn't for the whole "I'd never want to be a member of a group which would admit people like me as a member," I'd be tempted to sign up.



Comments (24)
This reminds me of an old s... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Sabba Hillel | October 21, 2009 12:04 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
This reminds me of an old story that I have seen quoted by Rabbi Berel Wein.
Why did G-d create atheism?
So that when someone poor appeals for help one should not say "G-d will help", but will say "It is up to me" and will help as needed.
Rabbi Wein once came to a wealthy man for help in certain matters. The rich man said "Don't worry Rabbi, G-d will provide."
Rabbi Wein responded, "That's my line. Your job is to write the check for the money that G-d provided."
BTW, I also find it intriguing that the "new atheists" mix up the concepts of "evidence" and "proof". There is plenty of evidence, some good and some better for (or against) the existence of G-d. However, evidence is not proof. What would convince me is not what would convince you and may even move you in the opposite direction that it does me. In fact, that is one of the pieces of evidence that inclines me to believe in G-d. That is G-d has granted Man free will and as such, there must be the possibility of deciding either way.
1. Posted by Sabba Hillel | October 21, 2009 12:04 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 12:04
2. Posted by Mac Lorry | October 21, 2009 12:06 PM | Score: 3 (5 votes cast)
Atheism 4.0 -- says we can't know if God exists or not, but we believe there's no God. That statement of faith makes us just another religion among many.
2. Posted by Mac Lorry | October 21, 2009 12:06 PM |
Score: 3 (5 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 12:06
3. Posted by bobdog | October 21, 2009 12:40 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
"God is dead." - Nietsche
"So are you, Nietsche." - God
3. Posted by bobdog | October 21, 2009 12:40 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 12:40
4. Posted by God | October 21, 2009 12:44 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Beam Me up when it's over..
4. Posted by God | October 21, 2009 12:44 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 12:44
5. Posted by Matt | October 21, 2009 12:57 PM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
IMHO, which could be totally wrong, but it's still mine, we already have religion(s) that do not depend on the existence of God. Secular Humanism, Communism, Global Warmer's, various pagan groups etc. The fact that some young athiests have a "discovered" religion without God is not new, mankind has followed this delusion for centuries.
5. Posted by Matt | October 21, 2009 12:57 PM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 12:57
6. Posted by Matt | October 21, 2009 12:59 PM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
When it comes to atheists, how does one vehemently disbelieve in something that doesn't exist?
6. Posted by Matt | October 21, 2009 12:59 PM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 12:59
7. Posted by Mac Lorry | October 21, 2009 1:36 PM | Score: -1 (3 votes cast)
Missed writing class I see. Here, I'll fix it... Atheists vehemently believe God doesn't exist.
7. Posted by Mac Lorry | October 21, 2009 1:36 PM |
Score: -1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 13:36
8. Posted by Matt | October 21, 2009 1:52 PM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Okay, I'll simplify.
How does one actively disbelieve in something that doesn't exist?
8. Posted by Matt | October 21, 2009 1:52 PM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 13:52
9. Posted by Sabba Hillel | October 21, 2009 2:06 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Matt: The point is that they do not "actively disbelieve", they actively believe in a particular point of view without any proof. The fact that the point of view is that "G-d does not exist" is no different than actively believing in Zeus, Cthulhu, Quetzalcoetl, or any other non-provable condition. Many of the arguments for this position fall into the same fallacies as many of the arguments against it. However, it is indeed more difficult to prove the nonexistence of something, especially when one can argue that the circumstances for detecting that object have not been specified.
Sometimes it seems that these arguments are statements of the type
Of course the fallacy in that is obvious. Atheists are no different from any other religious believers when it comes to arguing for their beliefs. Many of them do not even know what they are attempting to claim.
Look at the arguments between the and the Evolutionist many of which only show that neither side knows what creationism or evolutionism are or imply.
9. Posted by Sabba Hillel | October 21, 2009 2:06 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 14:06
10. Posted by Sabba Hillel | October 21, 2009 2:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sorry for the typo above, the sentence should read
Look at the arguments between the Creationists and the Evolutionists many of which only show that neither side knows what creationism or evolutionism are or imply.
10. Posted by Sabba Hillel | October 21, 2009 2:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 14:09
11. Posted by Mac Lorry | October 21, 2009 2:30 PM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
In making the statement that God doesn't exist you are claiming to know something that can't be known. You can only believe God doesn't exist.
11. Posted by Mac Lorry | October 21, 2009 2:30 PM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 14:30
12. Posted by _Mike_ | October 21, 2009 2:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Teapot.
12. Posted by _Mike_ | October 21, 2009 2:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 14:47
13. Posted by 914 | October 21, 2009 2:47 PM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
"Okay, I'll simplify.
How does one actively disbelieve in something that doesn't exist?"
BY BEING AN ATHEIST.. It is a choice to look at yourself and imagine where you came from? It is also a choice to play stupid mind games with your soul when there are so many better things to accomplish.
13. Posted by 914 | October 21, 2009 2:47 PM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 14:47
14. Posted by Jennifer | October 21, 2009 2:55 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
This new group are typical of the way the world seems to be gravitating, Not hot, not cold but lukewarm in all the decisions that they make.
14. Posted by Jennifer | October 21, 2009 2:55 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 14:55
15. Posted by bobdog | October 21, 2009 3:16 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Matt, here:
How can you vehemently disbelieve something you don't believe exists in the first place?
(Hey, the other night I called Rangel a Senator. There are days like that.)
15. Posted by bobdog | October 21, 2009 3:16 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 15:16
16. Posted by 914 | October 21, 2009 3:34 PM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
#4
Scotty
16. Posted by 914 | October 21, 2009 3:34 PM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 15:34
17. Posted by Matt | October 21, 2009 4:02 PM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
I'm reminded of the scene in "The Mummy," where the weasely little guide comes face to face with the Mummy and pulls out his necklace of religious talismans hoping to find the one that will appeal to the Mummy.
Unfortunately I'm afraid that our culture is headed that way more and more.
17. Posted by Matt | October 21, 2009 4:02 PM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 16:02
18. Posted by Mac Lorry | October 21, 2009 4:23 PM | Score: -1 (3 votes cast)
Hollywood seldom misses a chance to take a poke at religion. Believing such people know anything about either religion or life is foolish.
18. Posted by Mac Lorry | October 21, 2009 4:23 PM |
Score: -1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 16:23
19. Posted by JustRuss | October 21, 2009 4:54 PM | Score: -2 (4 votes cast)
You must convince yourself that there is no higher power. That way you cannot be held responsible for evil you commit in life as long as you don't get caught. Atheism is a defense mechanism of those who wish to impose their will on others and not be held accountable.
19. Posted by JustRuss | October 21, 2009 4:54 PM |
Score: -2 (4 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 16:54
20. Posted by tyree | October 22, 2009 12:01 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The so-called "New Atheists" said there was no God, and they were vocally vicious about it.
And they wound up with a lot of vicious followers who are full of hate.
I hope a few of those people examine their lives and look into this new movement. The country could use a little less viciousness.
20. Posted by tyree | October 22, 2009 12:01 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 00:01
21. Posted by 914 | October 22, 2009 12:33 AM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Since Im inbetween drinks we'll talk.
maybe not.
21. Posted by 914 | October 22, 2009 12:33 AM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 00:33
22. Posted by Fo | October 22, 2009 7:56 AM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
fallacy after fallacy... you cannot presuppose something that can't be proven. You cannot disprove that God doesn't exist.
silly supersticious people...
22. Posted by Fo | October 22, 2009 7:56 AM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 07:56
23. Posted by Mac Lorry | October 22, 2009 11:34 AM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Nor can you prove God doesn't exit. Thus to say God doesn't exist is to claim you know something that can't be known. To continue to make an unprovable claim as if it were fact is self-delusional and a lie. The best you can say is that you don't believe God exists, and you say that as a matter of faith, not of knowledge. Welcome to the silly superstitious people club, mere human.
23. Posted by Mac Lorry | October 22, 2009 11:34 AM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 22, 2009 11:34
24. Posted by foosmack | October 25, 2009 4:16 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Nor can you prove God doesn't exit. Thus to say God doesn't exist is to claim you know something that can't be known. To continue to make an unprovable claim as if it were fact is self-delusional and a lie. The best you can say is that you don't believe God exists, and you say that as a matter of faith, not of knowledge. Welcome to the silly superstitious people club, mere human.
----
Right, and you cannot prove that Santa doesn't exist. You probably don't believe in scientific method, so it might be hard to make that work for you. So, I won't go that way. On the topic of me being delusional. Am I delusional for not believing in the virgin birth and that the people lived in a fish, or in Santa. To me, religion, god (over time), and Santa are man-made.
As a matter of faith, I have faith in you, humans. Not in man-made hokus-pokuses. A free world of thought and expression are essentials for a free world. That is why I think our conversation is good.
24. Posted by foosmack | October 25, 2009 4:16 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2009 04:16