Photo: Nookie Parties/AP
Well, there are hundreds of pseudo-double speak that I could use to begin this story, but I guess I won't... Jumping in Pools and the New York Daily News are reporting that Stefanie Velez-Gentry, a Republican candidate for the New Jersey state Assembly "makes a living hosting sex-toy parties."
From the Daily News:
One campaign for the New Jersey Legislature is off to an arousing start.Stepfanie Velez-Gentry, a Republican from Bellmawr running for state Assembly, makes a living hosting sex- toy parties.
As the owner of Nookie Parties, she organizes gatherings for women and couples in which she sells sex toys, lotions, games, lingerie and other erotic items.
"It's kind of like a Tupperware party, but with adult novelties," the 29-year-old mother of two said.
Finally, New Jersey will get some help to lift up its economy!
Kevin adds: Picture added (and here's a Facebook link), and courtesy of James H. in the comments:
"Finally. A Republican who supports effective stimulus."
Permalink | Linking Blogs | Sphere: Related Content | Digg this! | FARK It!
Filed under:
Elections
Tags: Daily News
Comments (16)
I'd still vote for her. The... (Below threshold)1. Posted by JustRuss | October 20, 2009 2:20 PM | Score: 9 (11 votes cast)
I'd still vote for her. There is nothing wrong with sex or even selflove or between couples. I would think lefties would be all over voting for her!
I feel sorry for the far righties who believe that sex is evil or only for procreation.
I am a libertarian, stay out of my wallet and my bedroom.
1. Posted by JustRuss | October 20, 2009 2:20 PM |
Score: 9 (11 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 14:20
2. Posted by apb | October 20, 2009 2:35 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Eh -
I guess she helps fill a gap in the economy...
2. Posted by apb | October 20, 2009 2:35 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 14:35
3. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | October 20, 2009 2:44 PM | Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
At least she's upfront about it. Corzine and company have been doing it to NJ w/o persmission or a condom for years...
3. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | October 20, 2009 2:44 PM |
Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 14:44
4. Posted by J.R. | October 20, 2009 2:47 PM | Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
I bet she does more honest work than most of the pols currently in NJ politics.
As long as she if for reducing the size of government and lowering taxes I would have no problem voting for her.
4. Posted by J.R. | October 20, 2009 2:47 PM |
Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 14:47
5. Posted by capitalisa | October 20, 2009 2:51 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Nothing wrong with that at all. Consenting adults, productive work, etc. I'd vote for her!
5. Posted by capitalisa | October 20, 2009 2:51 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 14:51
6. Posted by GarandFan | October 20, 2009 2:53 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
WOW! That info is right up there with Barney Frank's lover running a prostitution ring out of Barney's home. It doesn't appear to have hurt Barney's re-election.
6. Posted by GarandFan | October 20, 2009 2:53 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 14:53
7. Posted by James H | October 20, 2009 3:06 PM | Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Finally. A Republican who supports effective stimulus.
7. Posted by James H | October 20, 2009 3:06 PM |
Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 15:06
8. Posted by JustRuss | October 20, 2009 3:39 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
@7
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Win
8. Posted by JustRuss | October 20, 2009 3:39 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 15:39
9. Posted by Roy | October 20, 2009 3:53 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
She's qualified to be a politician, and even has the correct tools to do a good job with us taxpayers.
9. Posted by Roy | October 20, 2009 3:53 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 15:53
10. Posted by 914 | October 20, 2009 4:26 PM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
I wonder if She got any of the stimulust funds?
10. Posted by 914 | October 20, 2009 4:26 PM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 16:26
11. Posted by jbw | October 20, 2009 5:14 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
that will get a rise out of the voters.
11. Posted by jbw | October 20, 2009 5:14 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 17:14
12. Posted by OregonMuse | October 20, 2009 6:19 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Looks like the NJ Democrats are facing stiff competition this time around.
12. Posted by OregonMuse | October 20, 2009 6:19 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 18:19
13. Posted by Dave | October 20, 2009 7:45 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
I guess intead of a community organizer, she is a conjugal organizer?
13. Posted by Dave | October 20, 2009 7:45 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 19:45
14. Posted by Baron Von Ottomatic | October 20, 2009 7:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
...like Tunguska circa 1908.
14. Posted by Baron Von Ottomatic | October 20, 2009 7:58 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2009 19:58
15. Posted by 914 | October 21, 2009 1:24 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Have tounge, will travel.
uggghh
15. Posted by 914 | October 21, 2009 1:24 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 01:24
16. Posted by thecomputerguy | October 21, 2009 10:59 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Why is this even a big deal? Have republicans bought into the dem's notion that we're all prudes?
If anything, the dems should be the prudes. After all, apparently they've bought hook line and sinker into the whole overpopulation thing. And wonder of wonders, and like it or not, its sex that causes population to begin with.
Go forge ahead, brave dems. Stop having sex for mother earth. When you think about sex, you should think about the potential carbon impact you're having. After all, only abstinence is 100% effective...
16. Posted by thecomputerguy | October 21, 2009 10:59 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2009 10:59