Larry Kudlow's new piece at NRO, a reaction to the TARP Inspector General's report, is a must-read:
The IG's report also notes that what started last October as a single-purpose $750 billion effort to buy toxic securities has morphed into twelve separate programs that cover up to $3 trillion in direct spending, loans, and loan guarantees. In other words, TARP is nearly equal in size to the entire federal budget.Now, Geithner & Co. has said very little about this. Even in yesterday's TARP oversight hearing, very little was said about the Barofsky critique. That's too bad, because this is a crucial area of investigation. TARP is badly in need of reform -- or maybe better yet, badly in need of termination.
Think about this: TARP, which is now linked to substantial criminal activity, has ballooned to the size of a second federal budget and represents the biggest government-directed intrusion into the economy in history -- vastly bigger than the New Deal. And not only is there TARP for banks, insurance companies, and non-bank financial institutions, but also for GM, Chrysler, and various auto suppliers, and perhaps soon enough for credit cards, newspapers, and other sectors of the economy.
This is why I believe the era of democratic free-market capitalism is coming to an end. It is being replaced by state-directed corporatism on a grand scale. This is central planning that goes way beyond the American tradition. (emphasis added)
Obama supporters can blame Bush for all of TARP's problems if they so choose, but Senate and House Democrats openly supported the plan and encouraged its implementation ASAP. President-elect Obama's transition team repeatedly announced support for expanded Federal government bailouts, specifically with respect to the auto industry and TARP II. And during its first 100 days, the Obama Administration has only talked more government bailouts and industry control, not less.
For the record, I agreed with the need for the first TARP cash infusion into banks in late September/early October 2008, because at the time there was tremendous concern, backed by what appeared to be solid evidence, that our major banks did not have the liquidity necessary to continue lines of credit. If short-term loans or lines of credit had in fact suddenly become unavailable for American businesses, we would have been in big trouble.
Opponents of TARP have continually argued that the amount of money involved, combined with the potential for both governmental and private sector abuse, meant that TARP was much more of a Pandora's Box than a panacea. Right now, it seems that their criticism was right on the money.



Comments (16)
"In other words, TARP is ne... (Below threshold)1. Posted by tomg51 | April 23, 2009 10:22 AM | Score: 6 (8 votes cast)
"In other words, TARP is nearly equal in size to the entire federal budget."
And isn't the current printing of additional money about that size, also?
1. Posted by tomg51 | April 23, 2009 10:22 AM |
Score: 6 (8 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 10:22
2. Posted by bryanD | April 23, 2009 10:54 AM | Score: -9 (15 votes cast)
"Obama supporters can blame Bush for all of TARP's problems if they so choose, but Senate and House Democrats openly supported the plan and encouraged its implementation ASAP."-ml
i.e. George B. is a GOOD kid who got mixed up with the wrong crowd and helped the Crips burgle his grandparents' house.
It is rumored that George B. feels terrible about it but the rumor is unsubstantiated and could well be false.
2. Posted by bryanD | April 23, 2009 10:54 AM |
Score: -9 (15 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 10:54
3. Posted by OLDPUPPYMAX | April 23, 2009 11:44 AM | Score: 4 (10 votes cast)
TARP has never been about anything but confiscation, power and control. Tragically, Atlas continues to shrug.
3. Posted by OLDPUPPYMAX | April 23, 2009 11:44 AM |
Score: 4 (10 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 11:44
4. Posted by ODA315 | April 23, 2009 12:25 PM | Score: 3 (9 votes cast)
Thanks BryanD.......right on cue
4. Posted by ODA315 | April 23, 2009 12:25 PM |
Score: 3 (9 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 12:25
5. Posted by GarandFan | April 23, 2009 12:34 PM | Score: 5 (9 votes cast)
Pass legislation in panic, then you can repent at your leisure. Just wait until the bleating starts about the DEMOCRATIC pork bill.
But I'm sure Bryan will say that it's all George Bush's fault. Funny, but it's got Obama's signature on it. You know, the guy who was against earmarks, that signed a bill with over 8,000 EARMARKS in it. But hey, that was LAST YEAR'S bill, so it's okay. Nuance.
5. Posted by GarandFan | April 23, 2009 12:34 PM |
Score: 5 (9 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 12:34
6. Posted by bryanD | April 23, 2009 1:19 PM | Score: -3 (11 votes cast)
"But I'm sure Bryan will say that it's all George Bush's fault. Funny, but it's got Obama's signature on it."-garand
Two things: Obama is proud to have his signature on it. It's what Democrats run for office to do (which is why I'm still a nominal Republican), namely, attach their names to bills seen as immediate, ameliorative and progressive. That's the pitch for the soap they sell. Did you just fall off a turnip truck?
The other thing, Bernake, Paulson, and (yes) Bush (ESPECIALLY Bush) premeditated the soaking of the taxpayers through TARP no later than mid-September 2008. By early October the only Republicans who refused to drink Bush's piss were Ron Paul, James Inhofe, and a couple others.
That's where Chapter 1 "The Set-Up" begins: inside the west wing of the White House during the Bush administration. All Bushco. Cheney was not even allowing Biden to visit the Vice-Presidential residence to measure for curtains. Remember?
Happy amnesia, or psychosis, or whatever.
6. Posted by bryanD | April 23, 2009 1:19 PM |
Score: -3 (11 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 13:19
7. Posted by Roy | April 23, 2009 1:31 PM | Score: 3 (7 votes cast)
Blaming Bush for ongoing TARP corruption is funny. Maybe we should blame Al Capone for all of the corruption today in Chicago politics.
7. Posted by Roy | April 23, 2009 1:31 PM |
Score: 3 (7 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 13:31
8. Posted by Matt | April 23, 2009 1:43 PM | Score: 3 (5 votes cast)
My understanding has been that Al Capone was responsible for a good bit of the corruption in modern-day Chicago. It's no longer his problem (may he continue to burn in hell), he didn't invent corruption in Chicago, but he fostered it. One of the things that facilitated Capone's rise to power was his very deliberately targeting and subverting the local politcal and judicial machine.
We can't deny that the Bush administration did set up and pass TARP which was deliberately left vague and and foggy. It's goal was to give Treasury great, extra-legislative control over the financial markets in this country (IMHO). Not "blaming" Bush, just observing.
That said we can't deny that the Obama administration has completely embraced TARP, expanded it greatly and defended it's lack of accountability and transparancy. Not "blaming" Obama, just observing.
Finally, where are the law suits challenging the constitutionality of TARP and similar programs? Institutionalized conservative groups are wailing and nashing their teeth, but what action are they taking?
8. Posted by Matt | April 23, 2009 1:43 PM |
Score: 3 (5 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 13:43
9. Posted by hcddbz | April 23, 2009 2:19 PM | Score: 1 (5 votes cast)
Kudlow was the biggest cheerleader for Trap. Saying how we would get a good return on investment and would allow for more government oversight. Then after a while he slowly came to the realization that his is horrid. This is prime example of slippery slow.
I all I can say is you ain't seen nothing yet.
9. Posted by hcddbz | April 23, 2009 2:19 PM |
Score: 1 (5 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 14:19
10. Posted by bryanD | April 23, 2009 2:50 PM | Score: -2 (8 votes cast)
"Then after a while he slowly came to the realization that his is horrid."-hcddbz
Well, Kudlow is on TV which has sound and saying "interesting!" would be inappropriate. His still-invited guest experts run 80% stupid on a good day. The purpose of TV financial coverage is SALES, SALES, SALES. If there wasn't the running ticker scroll on the bottom of the screen and the volume board no sane person would tune in at all.
10. Posted by bryanD | April 23, 2009 2:50 PM |
Score: -2 (8 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 14:50
11. Posted by marc | April 23, 2009 3:45 PM | Score: 2 (8 votes cast)
bryanD - "The other thing, Bernake, Paulson, and (yes) Bush (ESPECIALLY Bush) premeditated the soaking of the taxpayers through TARP no later than mid-September 2008."
You forgot the current TS and tax cheat, he was in on the drafting of the first tarp bill.
11. Posted by marc | April 23, 2009 3:45 PM |
Score: 2 (8 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 15:45
12. Posted by hyperbolist | April 23, 2009 4:02 PM | Score: 0 (6 votes cast)
I would ignore everything Kudlow has to say about economics (he's a pundit, not an economist), and follow closely everything this guy has to say about TARP and everything else related to the financial crisis. He was the first person to see it coming, and he's been right about everything since. Makes sense that the person who best understands the problem would be the one who best understands how to fix it.
12. Posted by hyperbolist | April 23, 2009 4:02 PM |
Score: 0 (6 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 16:02
13. Posted by hcddbz | April 23, 2009 4:30 PM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Kudlow was wrong and was man enough to admit it.
However all the Keynesian economics cheerleaders are still deluding themselves.
13. Posted by hcddbz | April 23, 2009 4:30 PM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 16:30
14. Posted by hyperbolist | April 23, 2009 5:24 PM | Score: -1 (5 votes cast)
hcddbz: Roubini is a Keynesian and has been more correct than every single supply-side economist on the planet.
Time for empiricism to triumph over ideology disguised as "common sense".
14. Posted by hyperbolist | April 23, 2009 5:24 PM |
Score: -1 (5 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2009 17:24
15. Posted by dkAllen | April 24, 2009 12:43 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"For the record, I agreed with the need for the first TARP cash infusion into banks in late September/early October 2008, because at the time..." and "... Right now, it seems that their criticism was right on the money."
This is about fundamentals. The argument against economic statism is two-fold.
Point 1: The state does not, nearly by definition, have the ability to properly manage the economy. It is too complicated, and too dynamic.
Point 2: The amount of power which is aggregated to the state is directly proportionate to the amount of corruption in government, and the resultant misuse of that power.
The OP seems to imply that it seemed to be a good idea at the time, but that hindsight argues otherwise. However, points 1 and 2 deal specifically with this; they are fundamentals, which should direct decisions in the absence of clear information. TARP was always a bad idea, /based on the fundamentals/ -- i.e., the state meddling this directly in economics is /always/ bad, regardless of the particular situation.
ML should have known better.
15. Posted by dkAllen | April 24, 2009 12:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 24, 2009 12:43
16. Posted by Ruggy | April 25, 2009 10:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
There's a word describing the situation we're in.
The word is clusterf*ck.
16. Posted by Ruggy | April 25, 2009 10:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 25, 2009 22:32