From Byron York:
You've heard a lot about the astonishing spending in the $787 billion economic stimulus bill, signed into law this week by President Barack Obama. But you probably haven't heard about a provision in the bill that threatens to politicize the way allegations of fraud and corruption are investigated -- or not investigated -- throughout the federal government.The provision, which attracted virtually no attention in the debate over the 1,073-page stimulus bill, creates something called the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board -- the RAT Board, as it's known by the few insiders who are aware of it. The board would oversee the in-house watchdogs, known as inspectors general, whose job is to independently investigate allegations of wrongdoing at various federal agencies, without fear of interference by political appointees or the White House.
In the name of accountability and transparency, Congress has given the RAT Board the authority to ask "that an inspector general conduct or refrain from conducting an audit or investigation." If the inspector general doesn't want to follow the wishes of the RAT Board, he'll have to write a report explaining his decision to the board, as well as to the head of his agency (from whom he is supposedly independent) and to Congress. In the end, a determined inspector general can probably get his way, but only after jumping through bureaucratic hoops that will inevitably make him hesitate to go forward.
Anyone care to guess the first investigation -- all in the name of "accountability and transparency" of course -- that the appropriately-named RAT board will "refrain from conducting"? Roland Burris? The Murtha/PMA earmark scandal? Links between Democrats and Allen Stanford? Control of the Census by the White House? Chris Dodd's sweetheart mortgage deal? Charlie Rangel's tax problems? Links between lobbyists from the financial sector and prominent Democrats?
Congress has ultimate power over all Federal agencies via their budgets. If an agency's inspector general defies the RAT board and conducts an investigation that damages Congressional Democrats, there will be hell to pay. "He who has the gold makes the rules," indeed.
(h/t Instapundit, via Riehl World View)



Comments (7)
We already have ample evide... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Jason | February 19, 2009 10:16 AM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
We already have ample evidence that this administration's "accountability and transparency" rhetoric is utter deceit.
http://www.rightklik.net/
1. Posted by Jason | February 19, 2009 10:16 AM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on February 19, 2009 10:16
2. Posted by MPR | February 19, 2009 10:39 AM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
I know all of you wacko, screeching, liberal, Obamalala lovers play fast and loose with the facts but, if you aren't too blinded with rage to read, check out the article linked below.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/who_are_the_big_spenders.html
2. Posted by MPR | February 19, 2009 10:39 AM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on February 19, 2009 10:39
3. Posted by proof | February 19, 2009 11:04 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Smells rather like a RAT!
3. Posted by proof | February 19, 2009 11:04 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on February 19, 2009 11:04
4. Posted by Franklins Locke | February 19, 2009 11:18 AM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
There is so much wrong with this that it is hard to find just one point to make. I have been using the word 'ridiculous" so much in the last week that I am tired of it.
BUT, this is ridiculous!
This is exactly why WE need to stay vigilant and keep spreading the TRUTH. No one is and soon won't be able to. This allows them to ANYTHING they want without any consequences. When the government stops investigating itself, then it is the citizens' responsibility to keep the spotlight on them and sound the alarm.
We are the Paul Reveres' on the 21st century. Mount up, Boys! Time to ride! Spread the word!
http://franklinslocke.blogspot.com/
4. Posted by Franklins Locke | February 19, 2009 11:18 AM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on February 19, 2009 11:18
5. Posted by Clay | February 19, 2009 12:42 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Our forefathers mounted a revolution for much, much less than what their legacy has become. They continue because we let them.
5. Posted by Clay | February 19, 2009 12:42 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on February 19, 2009 12:42
6. Posted by epador | February 19, 2009 11:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Scroll up to Kim's post on this subject for more interesting tidbits.
6. Posted by epador | February 19, 2009 11:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 19, 2009 23:07
7. Posted by Jeff | February 20, 2009 12:02 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think there are valid arguments on both side about this government plan. Will it raise the budget deficit? Probably. Will it help? That's a good question. I think economies go through cycles and this might be one of them. I read a good article on recessions and their history on
http://www.recessioninfocenter.com
7. Posted by Jeff | February 20, 2009 12:02 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 20, 2009 00:02