Lately, I've noticed a rise in what I call "drive-by cut and paste bandits" in comments sections, both here and on other sites. People find the top article on a blog and just dump their rants in the comments, and if they're related to the topic at hand even tangentially it's entirely by accident.
It's getting on my nerves, and I want to do something about it.
Normally, I'd bounce this off my colleagues here, but my Wizbang e-mail account is still a bit wonky from my recent computer issues, and I can't rely on that working properly. So, instead, I thought I'd toss it out and let everyone in the Wizbang community have their say.
In the end, that won't really matter much, as enforcing comment policy is in the hands of me, Maggie, and the author of the piece in question, and setting policy is Kevin's right alone, but I think it would be very helpful to hear what you folks think.
The options that come to mind for me are:
1) Ignoring them.
B) Mocking them.
III) Disemvowelling them.
d) Deleting them.
iiiii) Banning them.
Naturally, the latter can be used in conjunction with any of the above, but most of these people are one-hit wonders; they haven't commented before, and aren't likely to try again. So it's largely symbolic, but still satisfying.
So, what say you folks? What do you think we ought to do?
I can't say that what you say will have any effect, but I do promise you that at least I will read and consider your opinions before I make my case to my colleagues.



Comments (39)
I'd say disenvowellment. N... (Below threshold)1. Posted by JLawson | September 4, 2008 2:18 PM | Score: 5 (7 votes cast)
I'd say disenvowellment. Not much point in banning them - but yanking their vowels will certainly shorten some of the screeds, and might make them more comprehensible...
1. Posted by JLawson | September 4, 2008 2:18 PM |
Score: 5 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:18
2. Posted by WildWillie | September 4, 2008 2:18 PM | Score: 5 (9 votes cast)
I say for the most part disenvowel them. But sometimes, even some of the regular trolls just get plain vile. Banning them would not be bad.
We can tease and name call, but we don't have to be personal or vulgar. IMHO ww
2. Posted by WildWillie | September 4, 2008 2:18 PM |
Score: 5 (9 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:18
3. Posted by Paul A'Barge
| September 4, 2008 2:20 PM | Score: 3 (5 votes cast)
Delete them.
3. Posted by Paul A'Barge
| September 4, 2008 2:20 PM |
Score: 3 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:20
4. Posted by hvywgt | September 4, 2008 2:20 PM | Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Motion to delete.
Disemvowelling them still leaves a bad taste.
Save banning for unforgivable infractions.
4. Posted by hvywgt | September 4, 2008 2:20 PM |
Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:20
5. Posted by CR | September 4, 2008 2:30 PM | Score: 2 (10 votes cast)
Why not a hard character count limit to comments? A few sentences, a paragraph or so should be enough to make a point. Anyone needing more than that should start his own blog.
5. Posted by CR | September 4, 2008 2:30 PM |
Score: 2 (10 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:30
6. Posted by Larry | September 4, 2008 2:36 PM | Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
delete
6. Posted by Larry | September 4, 2008 2:36 PM |
Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:36
7. Posted by Eric | September 4, 2008 2:41 PM | Score: 8 (10 votes cast)
Disemvowelment, remember when you take out the vowels in Obama all that's left is a BM.
7. Posted by Eric | September 4, 2008 2:41 PM |
Score: 8 (10 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:41
8. Posted by Mac Lorry | September 4, 2008 2:43 PM | Score: 6 (8 votes cast)
I think it depends on who's posting. Regulars who generally contribute meaningful content should get more leeway than one-time or rare contributors. When action is needed then disemvowelling is a good step. As for Troll's, well what would Wizbang be like if we all agreed on everything? As long as their posts contain some reasoned content then I would just as soon let them have their say.
8. Posted by Mac Lorry | September 4, 2008 2:43 PM |
Score: 6 (8 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:43
9. Posted by Son Of The Godfather | September 4, 2008 2:43 PM | Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Nuke Em from Orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
9. Posted by Son Of The Godfather | September 4, 2008 2:43 PM |
Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:43
10. Posted by HughS | September 4, 2008 2:44 PM | Score: 5 (7 votes cast)
Why not a hard character count limit to comments?
That would eliminate one known problem.
I think the current policy works well.
10. Posted by HughS | September 4, 2008 2:44 PM |
Score: 5 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:44
11. Posted by Falze | September 4, 2008 2:45 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
If you guys have time, just delete them, maybe with a 'off topic comment removed' note if possible. Biggest problem is that people will have likely already responded, so you're going to have comment sections littered with responses to missing comments.
11. Posted by Falze | September 4, 2008 2:45 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:45
12. Posted by kbiel
| September 4, 2008 2:59 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Disemvowelment +1
12. Posted by kbiel
| September 4, 2008 2:59 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 14:59
13. Posted by maggie | September 4, 2008 3:09 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Personally, I like it when Jay has finally
had enough and gets out the Troll Hammer. :)
Drivebys need to be disemvoweled or
deleted, IMHO.
13. Posted by maggie | September 4, 2008 3:09 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 15:09
14. Posted by ClobberGirl | September 4, 2008 3:15 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
I vote disemvowel.
14. Posted by ClobberGirl | September 4, 2008 3:15 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 15:15
15. Posted by The Listkeeper | September 4, 2008 3:26 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
This poll is flawed. There is no option for "Call in massive airstrikes on their location" or "Hire elite assassins to kill them and then place their heads on pikes as a warning to others".
15. Posted by The Listkeeper | September 4, 2008 3:26 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 15:26
16. Posted by Bill Jempty | September 4, 2008 3:32 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
I suggest forcing them to read more of my posts I wrote when under the influence of a bathroom cabinet full of medications.
Bill
16. Posted by Bill Jempty | September 4, 2008 3:32 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 15:32
17. Posted by MagicalPat | September 4, 2008 3:32 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Can't we just call their mommy and ask her to bring junior a fresh glass of ovaltine?
17. Posted by MagicalPat | September 4, 2008 3:32 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 15:32
18. Posted by OregonMuse | September 4, 2008 3:34 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
I vote for deleting with extreme prejudice.
18. Posted by OregonMuse | September 4, 2008 3:34 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 15:34
19. Posted by DJ Drummond | September 4, 2008 3:39 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
I could tell you ... but then I'd have to kill a troll or two.
19. Posted by DJ Drummond | September 4, 2008 3:39 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 15:39
20. Posted by BrianinFairOaks | September 4, 2008 3:40 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
If it is not too much database space, record the name and email address of everyone that has commented for the last nnn (90?) days. If they have commented in that time frame then their comment gets posted immediately. If not, it goes to moderation where one of you lucky folks gets to decide if it appears or not.
20. Posted by BrianinFairOaks | September 4, 2008 3:40 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 15:40
21. Posted by cindermutha
| September 4, 2008 3:41 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Delete. Especially if they have links
21. Posted by cindermutha
| September 4, 2008 3:41 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 15:41
22. Posted by rodney dill | September 4, 2008 3:41 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Editing their comments for comedic value -- Nearly any rant is more entertaining when prefixed with.
"I may have my head up my ass but I believe that ...."
Or some other such comments.
22. Posted by rodney dill | September 4, 2008 3:41 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 15:41
23. Posted by Son Of The Godfather | September 4, 2008 4:06 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Blood for Odin!
23. Posted by Son Of The Godfather | September 4, 2008 4:06 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 16:06
24. Posted by OLDPUPPYMAX | September 4, 2008 4:11 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Post a clear warning that imbeciles will be severely mocked.
24. Posted by OLDPUPPYMAX | September 4, 2008 4:11 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 16:11
25. Posted by Tim | September 4, 2008 4:14 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
thnk y shld dsmvwl thm ll. Thn bn th smbtchs. Aeaey, ou ou ieooa e.
25. Posted by Tim | September 4, 2008 4:14 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 16:14
26. Posted by twolaneflash | September 4, 2008 4:16 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
All the above, at owner's discretion, since these discussion are in your house. Trolls must die, that's a certainty. They soil the furniture and stain the carpets.
26. Posted by twolaneflash | September 4, 2008 4:16 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 16:16
27. Posted by apb | September 4, 2008 4:21 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Disemvowelling looks pretty cool - enough scratch to see they were there, not enough to waste effort on...
27. Posted by apb | September 4, 2008 4:21 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 16:21
28. Posted by Mycroft | September 4, 2008 4:31 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
All of the above?
28. Posted by Mycroft | September 4, 2008 4:31 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 16:31
29. Posted by Peter F. | September 4, 2008 4:37 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Delete.
29. Posted by Peter F. | September 4, 2008 4:37 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 16:37
30. Posted by Sheik Yur Bouty | September 4, 2008 4:51 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Disemvowelling is good.
But I really like suggestions 20 and 22.
30. Posted by Sheik Yur Bouty | September 4, 2008 4:51 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 16:51
31. Posted by Jim | September 4, 2008 4:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'd vote to first disemvowel, which leads right into mocking. Once that palls, by all means delete.
31. Posted by Jim | September 4, 2008 4:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 16:51
32. Posted by Gmac | September 4, 2008 5:12 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Delete them, they're a waste of bandwidth and disk space.
32. Posted by Gmac | September 4, 2008 5:12 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 17:12
33. Posted by Knightbrigade | September 4, 2008 5:37 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
MY vote is DELETE..
Reading disemvoweled comments makes me want to learn Russian....which I DON'T want to!!
33. Posted by Knightbrigade | September 4, 2008 5:37 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 17:37
34. Posted by retired military | September 4, 2008 7:07 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Dont delete them. Since they are cut and paste bandits just cut and paste back.
Replace their entries with something like
"I was going to vote for Obama and then he didnt choose Hillary so I am not voting at all"
Something to where if they ever do come back they will wonder what happened to their post.
34. Posted by retired military | September 4, 2008 7:07 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 19:07
35. Posted by Rich | September 4, 2008 7:22 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
I would say the funny edit. I still find myself trying to read the words with the disemvoweling. Its like reading captions on a show when you know the language. I just can't help myself.
35. Posted by Rich | September 4, 2008 7:22 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 19:22
36. Posted by Oyster | September 4, 2008 8:48 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I say B, then III. At least give us our fun for a little while first.
Or you could get something that would not disemvowel them but replace nouns with other nouns. Now THAT would be entertaining.
36. Posted by Oyster | September 4, 2008 8:48 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 20:48
37. Posted by Darlajune | September 4, 2008 9:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
delete
37. Posted by Darlajune | September 4, 2008 9:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 21:06
38. Posted by CoolRich59
| September 4, 2008 9:59 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Delete
38. Posted by CoolRich59
| September 4, 2008 9:59 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 21:59
39. Posted by Arthur | September 4, 2008 10:03 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Disemvowell them!
Off with their Vowels!
39. Posted by Arthur | September 4, 2008 10:03 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 4, 2008 22:03