Why do I have the feeling that this smells like harassment and discrimination? What scum.

How very low. Done to man or woman, I feel it to be a dispicable act.

Democrats are really showing their true colors this time around. The venom online is unreal.

Oh for cryin' in the creek - when will the Democrats run on issues instead of playing all these insidious games?

In fact, let's up the ante - when will Obama pay a visit to those running the show for the Alaska Democrats and clean house to show he's serious about the security of our private/personal information?

As I said earlier:

Interesting how we found out so much about Palin in a matter of days:

1) Pregnant daughter
2) Her prenatal care responsibilities
3) Political affiliations dating back to early 1990's
4) Husband has DUI
5) Palin was pregnant when she married
6) And now SS#...

Conservatives will take in this information and form their own decisions, which I predict will galvanize their support.

But let's not ignore the ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM (listen up Hillary supporters)....where was this vast, sweeping, detailed and instantaneous background check on Barrack Obama during the primaries?

No where to be seen, that's where. And is anyone fooled by the subterfuge that the BHO campaign pushed a phony Palin "not pregnant" pregnancy story and used a proxy like the scum bag on KOS to get this story in the MSM in a manner that didn't dirty Obama's clean (thank's Biden) image?

Call for John McCain: Hire Roger Stone immediately.

1) Pregnant daughter

News leaked to Reuters by McCain camp.

3) Political affiliations dating back to early 1990's

The right links Obama to William Ayers, from early 1970's, when Obama was a preteen.

Plus, the right claims to be the party of patriotism, and a cessationist organization doesn't sound too patriotic.

2) Her prenatal care responsibilities
4) Husband has DUI
5) Palin was pregnant when she married

Republicans make a platform of family values.

6) And now SS#...

Yes, uncalled for.

Interesting how we found out so much about Palin in a matter of days:

So your complaint is about the relative speed of Democrats compared to Republicans?

where was this vast, sweeping, detailed and instantaneous background check on Barrack Obama during the primaries?

Did you sleep through them? Rev. Wright, Ayers, his father's a Muslim, he did drugs as a youth, he wrote only one law review article, ... Or are you just upset that they didn't find more dirt on him?

Sweet Jesus! It's funny how Democrats keep going on and on about the right to privacy, and then they pull stuff like this. So, what is their logic - protect the terrorist scumbag from an NSA wiretap, but go hog wild on Palin's personal info?

To paraphrase Dennis Miller - I'd call the Democrats scumbags, but that would be a disservice to bags of scum.

classy.

Brian, Obama was a full grown man when he became good friends with Ayers, who today is STILL unrepentant about his violent activities. Ayer's past was not a secret, but Obama chose to associate himself with this man, and allow him to back him politically.

For a woman who the libs believe should not even be standing in the same universe with Obama, they are sure making a very, very aggressive, almost savage, effort to destroy her. Why, it's as if they consider her a viable threat or something. Obama may consider himself fit to be president simply because he is running for the position, but if Ms. Palin puts up with this treatment and does not break, hell, she's got my vote. We would then have two people who were mercilessly tortured serving in the nation's two highest executive positions at the same time.

Did you sleep through them? Rev. Wright, Ayers,

Were Wright and Ayers on the front page of The New York Times in three front page articles on day four of the Obama candidacy? Didn't think so....

Brian,

Wright (a 20+ year, CLOSE relationship)and Ayers (whose wife worked with Michelle Obama when Barak met her in the 80's)were outed in spite of the TOTAL silence of the MSM.

Ayers launched Obama's political career from Ayers' own home...

Prenatal responsibilities: she consulted with her doctor when her water broke.

The husband was 22 when he got the DUI and hasn't been in 'trouble' since.

Palin was in her 20's when she got pregnant, who hasn't made mistakes in their 20's?

'Family values' isn't about living a perfect life, it IS about taking responsibility for our mistakes and trying to live according to time-tested principles.

The right links Obama to William Ayers, from early 1970's, when Obama was a preteen.

Obama was the head of a foundation William Ayers founded, details of which were only obtained last week. Who gets to be head of a foundation without the founder having an association with that person?

5) Palin was pregnant when she married

There's no proof of that. Like her 5th child her 1st child could have been born 1 month early, which is still considered a full term pregnancy.

Republicans make a platform of family values.

And Democrats make a platform of ethics. Their actions show just the opposite.

Did you sleep through them? Rev. Wright, Ayers, his father's a Muslim, he did drugs as a youth, he wrote only one law review article

You missed the birth certificate issue, which is on going. According to a law suit filed by Philip Berg , a Clinton supporter, thee independent experts examined Obama's birth certificate and judged it to be a fraud. According to the law suit family members claim that Obama was born in Kenya. Lucky for Obama that Philip Berg is just another leftwing nut case.

Outraged, yes.

Surprised that Dems. would do this, no. It's in their DNA.

So your complaint is about the relative speed of Democrats compared to Republicans?

The point flew right past you...or maybe you did get it. The MSM is in the pocket of the Democrats. Or the Democrats are in the pocket of the MSM...either way, point made. Speed to market in the MSM is superior when you are an Obama Democrat.

How hard was it to get a video of Wright after Obama won the Iowa caucus...not very hard for Sean Hannity, but incredibly difficult if you are a front page editor at NYT. As mentioned before, no wonder the Clintons are pissed. Two days of investigative work like Palin has received and Obama would never have won another caucus. But I'll give him credit, he learns fast.

A computer expert with cracker software can decipher the last 4 digits of any SS#... and then, all Hell breaks loose.

The words "identity theft" and "criminals" come to mind.

This is beyond usual hardball politics. This is harassment. And its aim is to scare off non-leftist women from running for office.

Democrats look at conservative/libertarian women as traitors to their sex, apostates, so they will do anything to destroy 'em.

If they can destroy Sarah Palin, then they know other women will think twice before running.

What despicable creatures.

It is downright shameful and despicable how the liberals and left-ists are doing their damnest to destroy this woman. First, misogyny. Then, lies. Then, character defamation. Now, accessory before the fact to identity theft. What is next? Outright physical assaults on her?

Given the nature of people who are doing these kinds of things, it really would not surprise me all that much...

News leaked to Reuters by McCain camp.

They didn't "leak" the news, they went ahead and announced it due to the Left accusing Sarah Palin of faking her 5th pregnancy!

Maybe you'd better check "Poltico" pulled their story because everyone was getting it wroNg, "free republic" now pulled their story...

You all need to do some vetting on your own before you post things with no basis in fact.

is it true people who love guns tend to jump them?

Were Wright and Ayers on the front page of The New York Times in three front page articles on day four of the Obama candidacy? Didn't think so....

Were McCains skeletons on the front page either? Were Hillarys, were Guilianis? No. Its because there is no impetus to go after nationally known politicians at breakneck speeds as a reporter when the field is so wide and many fallacies have already been talked about on these people. Palin is not known nationally and the process that normally goes on over the course of a national politicians career, has to now happen in an instant, and lets be clear, ALL 'spotlight' politicians have their skeletons dragged out and examined, whether they are Red or Blue.

Were McCains skeletons on the front page either? Were Hillarys, were Guilianis?

Pretty much, yes. Obama still hasn't been vetted by the media in this much detail.

Every comment, speech, and news article from the rabid left solidifies my support for McCain/Palin. I want the disgusting creatures inhabiting the far left to be very disappointed this fall.

Out of curiosity, when you say "these people", do you mean Democrats or the ill-behaved Democrats?

Darlene - "Democrats look at conservative/libertarian women as traitors to their sex, apostates, so they will do anything to destroy 'em.... If they can destroy Sarah Palin, then they know other women will think twice before running."

Indeed, whatever happened to the generation that grew up listening to the song that included "I am woman, hear me roar?"

Palin gets it and she's a bit young to have lived thru it, bit some that are old enough have turned bitter and frankly despicable.

Sean - "Were McCains skeletons on the front page either?"

It wasn't the first three days but the NYT did a "fine" job dredging up their phony story on lobbyists and alleged affair.

Were McCains skeletons on the front page either? Were Hillarys, were Guilianis?

The answer is yes, yes and yes. Oh, and let's not forget the matter of entire books devoted to those subjetcs.

You ask if Hillary's skeletons have been examined? How old are you? 18?

The WTC site was still smoldering when the MSM and NYT went after Guliani and Kerrick. Hell. McCain has been given the full proctological exam by both parties.

And Barry? As I said, the NYT, NBC and MSNBC ran cover for him until the caucus' were a foregone conclusion.

Yeah, in 2000 the MSM was running stories about McCain's temperment. Is he controlled enough to be president.

The lefty loons crack me up by even approaching the subject of the MSM being balanced. They are either liars or idiots, or worse, both. ww

Democrats know their way around the gutter very well...they've lived there all their lives so that's all they know.

Taking a page from one of their own (Michelle Obama)...this is the first time in my life I have every been ashamed of my fellow Americans.

I am not surprised, we knew this was going to get ugly. Obama is scheduled to appear on Bore-illy tonight. Let's see how aggressive his message is to his party about "knocking off" the nonsense.. or maybe he'll just suggest that Sarah sign up for TrustedID.
Oh lord... it's gonnna be great ride through November.

Annie

I am well beyond disgusted at the treatment of this woman and her family...
How vile can people be in this world...liberal pukes are subhuman scourge of the earth!!

Breaking: Visible Spectrum Reveals Sky is Blue!!!1!

I like Sarah Palin. I'm starting to like nothing about the Dems. John McCain could use this Jan & Dean song for Sarah's and his platform: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsHHQGY2_KU

Here's to the Dems: http://theseedsof9-11.com

The Democrats thought getting Obama into office was going to be a
cakewalk. The conservative GOP was less than enthused by McCain and
roughly one half was talking of staying home, writing someone else in
or voting third party. Now..the party is energized. They are in love with
this woman, sending money to McCain/Palin and looking forward to voting in November.
Of course they are scared SPITLESS! They now see a very good to
excellent chance that McCain/Palin will beat this pitiful specimen of a
candidate in November.

Sarah Palin NEVER was a member of the Alaska Independence Party. She has always been a registered Republican. Look it up.

Just another smear by Obama supporters...

Hi! http://ndlgteou.com efmux senxb http://sjjoluaz.com iktok linkd