While Tyler didn't say it, Gingrich basically was prevented from running for president by John McCain since the McCain-Feingold campaign finance regulations have made mixing political projects very difficult.
Gingrich may like to blame McCain-Feingold for his decision not to run, but the fact of the matter is that he's "damaged goods" after resigning in disgrace from Congress over his ethics problems related to his book dealings, another scandal involving sperlobbyist Rick Berman, and a disgraceful end to his marriage when his wife was dying of cancer announcing an affair to her. Gingrich's lack of personal ethics and values have hurt his fund raising potential more than anything. My personal opinion is that the GOP is far better without his personal baggage acting as a drag on the party. Christian conservatives would no doubt have trouble voting for Gingrich as well, but then again some of the others running will likely run weaker than usual with these voters due to their multiple marriages or other character issues as well.
1. Posted by
Paul Hooson | September 30, 2007 12:32 AM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Whatever the effect of the McCain-Feingold BCFRA on the legal status, as a practical political matter you can't get away with charging for speeches while running for President. That dog would never hunt.
Paul is correct, as well. Newt started out with high negatives even before his personal life and ethical problems became public knowledge, and went down from there. As I mentioned in my post Kim links above, he has higher negative ratings than Hillary - without the relatively high positives she also attracts.
Newt would have no chance at all of winning the nomination even if he were spotted the $30 mil. His mere presence in the race would have hurt the eventual Republican nominee's chances in the general election.
2. Posted by
Jim Addison | September 30, 2007 1:00 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
3. Posted by
JFO | September 30, 2007 8:43 AM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
JFO:
Gingrich is the Republican version of Clinton. Both men are brilliant in their own right. Both men are full of ideas. Both men have politically fatal character flaws. I've always liked listening to Gingrich though I disagree with almost all of his ideas. I find it interesting that history is full of brilliant people who have marvelous ideas and incredible talent yet there is a side to them which demonstrates the weaknesses of human nature.
3. Posted by
JFO | September 30, 2007 8:43 AM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
7. Posted by
jpm100 | September 30, 2007 1:59 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
jpm100:
He was run out of Washington. He may be liked by many in the Republican Party who like him even more because of the circumstances under which he left.
He is damaged goods and one of the few people that actually would negate Hillary's disadvantage.
I still consider him part of the Republican Congress who made many promises in the contract with America in order to get elected, turned away from much of it, and evolved in the mess that help lose the Republicans both the Senate and House in '06.
7. Posted by
jpm100 | September 30, 2007 1:59 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
Fresh Links
The Wizbang® Network
Credits
Section Editor: Maggie Whitton
Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert
Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port
Comments (7)
Gingrich may like to blame ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Paul Hooson | September 30, 2007 12:32 AM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Gingrich may like to blame McCain-Feingold for his decision not to run, but the fact of the matter is that he's "damaged goods" after resigning in disgrace from Congress over his ethics problems related to his book dealings, another scandal involving sperlobbyist Rick Berman, and a disgraceful end to his marriage when his wife was dying of cancer announcing an affair to her. Gingrich's lack of personal ethics and values have hurt his fund raising potential more than anything. My personal opinion is that the GOP is far better without his personal baggage acting as a drag on the party. Christian conservatives would no doubt have trouble voting for Gingrich as well, but then again some of the others running will likely run weaker than usual with these voters due to their multiple marriages or other character issues as well.
1. Posted by Paul Hooson | September 30, 2007 12:32 AM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 30, 2007 00:32
2. Posted by Jim Addison | September 30, 2007 1:00 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Whatever the effect of the McCain-Feingold BCFRA on the legal status, as a practical political matter you can't get away with charging for speeches while running for President. That dog would never hunt.
Paul is correct, as well. Newt started out with high negatives even before his personal life and ethical problems became public knowledge, and went down from there. As I mentioned in my post Kim links above, he has higher negative ratings than Hillary - without the relatively high positives she also attracts.
Newt would have no chance at all of winning the nomination even if he were spotted the $30 mil. His mere presence in the race would have hurt the eventual Republican nominee's chances in the general election.
2. Posted by Jim Addison | September 30, 2007 1:00 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 30, 2007 01:00
3. Posted by JFO | September 30, 2007 8:43 AM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Gingrich is the Republican version of Clinton. Both men are brilliant in their own right. Both men are full of ideas. Both men have politically fatal character flaws. I've always liked listening to Gingrich though I disagree with almost all of his ideas. I find it interesting that history is full of brilliant people who have marvelous ideas and incredible talent yet there is a side to them which demonstrates the weaknesses of human nature.
3. Posted by JFO | September 30, 2007 8:43 AM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 30, 2007 08:43
4. Posted by Paul | September 30, 2007 11:05 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
You people what to talk "damaged goods" from scandals and "high negatives" while Hillary Clinton is leading the Dem field?
Have you been paying attention?
4. Posted by Paul | September 30, 2007 11:05 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 30, 2007 11:05
5. Posted by Robert | September 30, 2007 11:44 AM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
He doesn't think guns kill people.
He thinks video games of guns kill people.
Brilliant he!
Isn't there an 8 year-old out there the Republican's can run for office?
5. Posted by Robert | September 30, 2007 11:44 AM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 30, 2007 11:44
6. Posted by SPQR | September 30, 2007 1:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"and a disgraceful end to his marriage when his wife was dying of cancer announcing an affair to her."
Nice exaggeration, Paul.
6. Posted by SPQR | September 30, 2007 1:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 30, 2007 13:11
7. Posted by jpm100 | September 30, 2007 1:59 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
He was run out of Washington. He may be liked by many in the Republican Party who like him even more because of the circumstances under which he left.
He is damaged goods and one of the few people that actually would negate Hillary's disadvantage.
I still consider him part of the Republican Congress who made many promises in the contract with America in order to get elected, turned away from much of it, and evolved in the mess that help lose the Republicans both the Senate and House in '06.
7. Posted by jpm100 | September 30, 2007 1:59 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 30, 2007 13:59