I would talk about Ann Coulter but you have to go to rehab if you call someone a faggot.

Ann's into guys, right?

Let me know when the english translation of this post is released, Paul.

Meanwhile, here's what I understand are the words Coulter said.

"If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot,"

Does that quote match your understanding?

And if you listen to Ms. Edwards' phone call you realize that she was listed a litany of complaints abut Coulter's low blows, not just this one.

Paul, sticking up for Ann shows what a class act you are.

>Does that quote match your understanding?

No, it doesn't Lee. But then I have a brain.

You're taking her out of context. You're a LIAR. and a fool.

No BarneyG2000 just doing this thing called looking at the facts.

I know you're not into such things.

The what do you believe she says, Paul? It sure sounds like --

"If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot"

Yep, I just listened two more times and that's exactly what she said.

Isn't that a fact, Paul? Or are you going to deny it despite the fact hat everyone can click on the video in your post and listen for themselves?

Coulter's comments are meant to be inflammatory. She's a troll in real life.

An arm of own publishing company "buys" enough copies of her book to propel it onto the best seller lists, and then gives this "National Bestseller!" away with a subscription to a magazine.

Lee since you refuse to hear the truth... maybe you can read it...

She said:

"About the same time Bill Maher said... but about the same time Bill Maher was not joking in saying he wished Dick Cheney had been killed by a terrorist attack.

Um- so I've learned my lesson...

If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot,"

If you can't see she is talking about the way the media ignored Maher's comments then you're a moron.

But we knew that.

Yet Another Thread Where Lee Ward Talks Too Much But Says Too Little

... still, anything Ann Coulter says PALES in comparison to how the left speaks (and has been speaking) of the administration.

Might I remind everyone that comparing anyone, let alone a president, to Hitler is a bit repugnant?

I'm not an Ann-fan, so-to-speak, but anyone, esp. Edwards, getting on Coulter without looking to what their supporters are saying are flat out hypocrites.

Then again, that's not news, either.

What is news is that John Edwards' wife defends him against being called a wuss.

I guess his mommy was busy, that day.

Lee, you really are not getting it.

Plus, Ann Coulter is not worth getting upset over (and that is of course precisely what she wants you to do).

On a side note, are any of the other regular readers of this blog sick of hearing people calling each other liars, for pretty much any reason? Just curious.

>On a side note, are any of the other regular readers of this blog sick of hearing people calling each other liars, for pretty much any reason? Just curious.

It's sort of an inside joke mantis. For months Lee has been screaming "lair" at anyone who proved him wrong.

So some of us decided to play with his diminutive brain.

You can fool some of the people some of the time..they all need to wear red long tail coats and top hats, stand in the middle of the ring and hold a chair. PT Barnum was small change compared to the 3 ring circus the press and liberals run.

Nice going liberal Lee Ward As usuala Kommiecrat disected a paragraph to distort the meaning. AC said that Kommiecrats can hope that the VP gets killed by terrorists but attack Americans if they imply the F word.

Eat it Kommie

Liz defends her husband for being called a whus. Now that's the difinition of a Whus...

It's sort of an inside joke mantis. For months Lee has been screaming "lair" at anyone who proved him wrong.

Oh, I know. I guess I'm just pointing out the problem behind the joke. He is primarily who I'm talking about.

Serious question Lee,

By my count, I've made a complete jackass out of you... no scratch that...

By my count, YOU'VE made a complete jackass out of YOURSELF in about 9 threads this week.

How many times do you need to lose your ass in a thread before you realize you're a hopeless little child and give up?

Do we need to embarrass you 10 times? 100? 1000?

If you tell me how many times you need to be completely pwned before you give up, we'll start keeping count.

I can keep knocking you in the dirt like a little child (though it hardly seems fair) forever...but I'd like to think I'm working toward something.

So tell me, how many times do you need to have your hat handed to you before you give up?

Mantis says:

>Oh, I know.

You're a liar!

Liar!

Typical dishonest spin from Lee. He knows the truth, but thinks he can just pretend it doesn't exist and everyone will believe him. That may work in liberal land, but not here.

Paul,

Thanks for posting this... It's the first sane thing I've heard written about Edward's feigned hurt feelings. It speaks volumes that that troll Bill Maher gets applause from his stacked audience, with NO outcry for his Cheney comment, but Ann, a forceful (and more often than not - accurate) woman gets whined at.

You hit the nail on the head with your article.

...and I honestly hate to stoop, but God D*MN, Lee, you're a buffoon.

Back to the topic, I'm not really an Ann Coulter, and I might even have agreed with Elizabeth Edwards if she had gone on the show to legitimately complain about Coulter's divisive name-calling. But she didn't do that. She brought up these bogus incidents and all in a transparent attempt to raise more funds for her husband's faltering campaign. Thankfully for her, there are enough idiotic liberals like Lee who won't question her phony BS.

Paul, you are a legend in your own mind, but you knew that already....

And I 'get' the context - Coulter is quite the wordsmith, and just like her statement that (paraphrasing) "calling John Edwards a faggot is an insult to gays" isn't really actually calling Edwards a faggot -

get it -

get the context -- she didn't "call " Edwards a faggot she said that "if she did..."

Here her ohhh so controversial statement was indirect as well. The words, her actions, her history speaks for itself, and to have the right defend her in this is wonderful. More posts like this Paul.

Edwards handed her her head an a platter - and watching Coulter squirm on Hardball was pure gold.

Paul, I think Lee somehow gets off on being proven wrong. There's no other explanation for it.

From what we have learned from the Post articles on Cheney (pushed for the war, torture..) it sounds like Maher was right on the button. Now tell me how Edwards, Gore and Clinton are gay as Annie has stated?

This is the "Thread of the Week" so far! LOL

Of course I'm probably lying....

(P.S. mantis, re: Heaven thread the other day: You were right, I was wrong on many accounts. You can thank my wife for pointing out my numerous errors to me. You can gloat now...quietly.)

Nice try Liar... um I mean Lee.

Another example of the biased MSM.

Ann Coulter is right on, and they can't stand it, so they take out of context. Ann's comments were hilarious. I love her.

Elizabeth Edwards complains. This from a woman who hired Amanda Marcotte to be her husbands blogger. And who said herself terrible things about her neighbor who is of the demographic she claims to care about. Bwhaahahaha....

You can't make this stuff up.

I just noticed something... Where are Larkin and Paul Hamilton and the rest of the "Blues Clues" in this thread?

Have they finally gotten tired of trying to cover for Lee when he steps in it?

I guess there is only so many times you want to be brought down.

Lee:

The First Law of Holes states __________________.

Oh, speaking of the Maher comment, here's what Lee had to say in response to Kim's post about it:

"Bill Maher Argues for VP Cheney's Assassination." Coulter gets her tongue caught in a wringer and the "Conserv-o-Smear-o-Matic" lying machine goes into high gear, even employing the right's patented Distract-0-Matic as a secondary weapon.

Kim's headline "Bill Maher Argues for VP Cheney's Assassination" is lie. He didn't suggest -- much less argue -- in favor of Cheney's assasination; he stated that fewer people would die tomorrow if Cheney was was dead.

"Maher: I'm just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That's a fact."

So ignoring Kim's lie for the moment, why aren't any of the commenters here addressing the validity of Mahrer's statement?

Because it's true, that's why.

Lee, your "lie" accusations do not carry the currency you think they do. And flooding the market with them only decreases their value.

Liar!

(P.S. the reason Coulter says outrageous things and the reason Maher says outrageous things: same reason.)

Barney, so Cheney's opinions mean it would be good for him to die in a terrorist attack?

And this is what the left calls reasoned debate?

P.S. As far as Elizabeth Edwards goes, she is quite a different person than she portrays herself, like in her book for example.

And she posts on the disgusting hate filled Democratic Underground. And she has the nerve to call out Ann Coulter!!! She is as big a hypocrite as her husband.

And don't forget her comments a few years ago about Lynn Cheney's feelings about her daughter Mary.

May they lose the primary in much humiliation.

Just the mention of Ann Coulter brings all the zombies out of the shadows......Mantis, Barney, Lee, Adrian......kinda like Bill Clinton at a Girls Scout convention.

What did Elizabeth Edwards say that was a lie?

Don't forget how her husband associates and recently appeared with Danny Glover who has said vile things about the president and this country, and who sucks up to murderous dictator thugs.

No wonder Lizzie is ready to change the subject.

If Ann Coulter were a lefty, she'd be getting a call now from The View for a possible job.

Did Elizabeth Edwards write the article that Paul doesn't link to? If not, then I don't understand what she lied about?

Newsbusters.org is reporting that Chris Matthews said "Ann Edwards" twice this morning on one of the AM shows.

Bwhahahahahahahahahaha.......Chrissy you ain't ready for the big time baby.

First of Maher did not say "get killed in a terrorist's attack". He said this:

BILL MAHER, HOST, HBO'S "REAL TIME": I have zero doubt that if Dick Cheney was not in power people wouldn't be dying needlessly tomorrow. If he did die, other people -- more people would live. That's a fact.

So for Annie to be factual she would had to have said:
"John Edwards was not in power (which he is not) people wouldn't be dying needlessly tomorrow. If he did die, other people -- more people would live. That's a fact.

So Annie can't even tell the truth about her or Bill's quote. Paul, why are you defending this sack of ship?

>What did Elizabeth Edwards say that was a lie?

That's an excellent question... Go watch the video Lee linked above. She got cold busted several times. This was just video proof.

>First of Maher did not say "get killed in a terrorist's attack".

Sorry Barney Google... You're a liar

Why would a guy nicknamed the Silky Pony (or Breck Girl) who spends 3 minutes looking at the mirror to style his hair ,who spends $400 on a haircut ....why is HE not speaking? Why is he letting his wife do the talking for him?

Oh wait. I think I just answered my own question.

Edwards handed her her head an a platter - and watching Coulter squirm on Hardball was pure gold.

leeward, the only people who think Edwards' wife handed Ann her head are demented socialists like you.

I just heard the whole thing, and Ms. Edwards sounded like the whiny liberal, full of false umbrage, that she is.

Now. let's get down to real mean and insensitive comments. How 'bout when Ms. Edwards insulted and whined about her redneck neighbor. Ms. Edwards attacked a common citizen. Not a public figure. Nope, she leveled her criticism at a regular ole fellow who was just working from day to day, trying to get by.

Oh, and isn't that guy one of the other America that the Breck Boy is whining about? I guess the real problem with the other America is that they are in the view of the oh so high and mighty Edwards.

Phoney's. Him and her both. Yuck!

"Oh, speaking of the Maher comment, here's what Lee had to say in response to Kim's post about it:"

Wow, I wrote that? That's pretty cool, and I still stand by it. Maher's words were specific --

Is it just me or is the entire thrust of every troll whine on this thread merely "It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is" as they try to dissect whether or not Ann Coulter exactly quoted someone and whether or not anything was said before or after said 'quote'? Truly they have not 'moved on' from the pantsless one era.

That's an excellent question... Go watch the video Lee linked above. She got cold busted several times. This was just video proof.

I am not a Righty so I never got the lie detector/mind reading gene. Can't you just tell me?

Also, IMHO, asking a reader to watch a video linked to by a commentor, in the comments section is lazy blogging. If you have Elizabeth Edwards pegged as liar you should be able to tell us, in the actual blog entry, exactly what she said that was a lie.

Paul, I think Lee somehow gets off on being proven wrong. There's no other explanation for it.

I can't really understand the thought processes that would make someone act like Lee Ward, but I have another explanation that might fit.

Some people think that by not admitting they're wrong, indeed, by trumpeting that they're right when they're obviously wrong, they can make others think they aren't wrong.

In other words, Lee declaring victory is an attempt at a self-fulling prophecy. Or the converse, Lee not admitting it was wrong is an attempt at trying to obfuscate the fact that it is, in fact, wrong.
That's my opinion on that. Yours has its merits though.

Barney , Bill Maher and spittle face Matthews are all sacks of shit , like yourself and pretty much every Lying LIberal. Why is that?

Have they finally gotten tired of trying to cover for Lee when he steps in it?

They're over at wizblues, busily commenting on each others posts, in an attempt to keep the comments per post average above 1.5.

here it is again with the italics fixed -- Lee

"Oh, speaking of the Maher comment, here's what Lee had to say in response to Kim's post about it:"

Wow, I wrote that? That's pretty cool, and I still stand by it. Maher's words were specific --

Kim's headline "Bill Maher Argues for VP Cheney's Assassination" is lie. He didn't suggest -- much less argue -- in favor of Cheney's assasination; he stated that fewer people would die tomorrow if Cheney was dead.

Maher: "I'm just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That's a fact."

And that is a fact. And no, Maher wasn't arguing in favor of Cheney's assassination - and yes, Kim did lie in her headline -- Maher said that fewer people would die if Cheney were dead, and that's a true statement.

Thanks for picking one where Kim really did in fact lie, Mantis. Got any more?

Maybe if we say it slowly for you, blue?

She - lied - when - she - said - that - Coulter's - paraphrasing - of - a - leftists' - comment - about - Cheney - using - Edwards - as - a - convenient - substitute - was - actually - an - attack - on - Edwards - and - not - an - attempt - at - commentary - on - media - bias.

Was that slow enough or do you need two -'s?

She - lied - when - she - said - that - Coulter's - paraphrasing - of - a - leftists' - comment - about - Cheney - using - Edwards - as - a - convenient - substitute - was - actually - an - attack - on - Edwards - and - not - an - attempt - at - commentary - on - media - bias.

She never said that. Chris Matthews mentioned that comment but Elizabeth Edwards didn't.

So, Elizabeth Edwards is wrong in asking for Ann Coulter to stop making personal attacks that lower the public discourse....

...Because Bill Maher said something that may have lowered the public discourse.

Please explain how Bill Maher saying something mean and harmful about Cheney, makes it cool for Ann Coulter to say something mean and harmful about Edwards and his family?

It's just, you know, my understanding that people are responsible for their own actions. And other people doing bad things to someone else, doesn't justify me being bad to another person who isn't even connected.

Context matters, Lee. The conversation on Maher's show started with this:

Maher: What about the people who got onto the Huffington Post - and these weren't even the bloggers, these were just the comments section - who said they, they expressed regret that the attack on Dick Cheney failed.

Then there was a discussion of how we are able to say things like that in this country, should Huffington have removed the comments, etc. And then,

Ridley: It's one thing to say you hate Dick Cheney, which applies to his politics. It's another thing to say, "I'm sorry he didn't die in an explosion." And I think, you know...

Maher: But you should be able to say it. And by the way...

Frank: Excuse me, Bill, but can I ask you a question? Do you decide what the topics are for this show?

Maher: Yeah, I decide the topics, they don't go there.

Frank: But you exercise control over the show the way that she does over her blog.

Maher: But I have zero doubt that if Dick Cheney was not in power, people wouldn't be dying needlessly tomorrow. (applause)

Scarborough: If someone on this panel said that they wished that Dick Cheney had been blown up, and you didn't say...

Frank: I think he did.

Scarborough: Okay. Did you say...

Maher: No, no. I quoted that.

Frank: You don't believe that?

Maher: I'm just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That's a fact.

The "if he did die" was clearly in the context of the assassination attempt. Maher was saying if Cheney had been assassinated, more people would live. I don't know how people argue for things where you come from, but where I come from they point out the potential benefits. Maher was obviously arguing that there would be benefits to a Cheney assassination, therefore he was arguing for it.

If you want to be honest and consistent, Lee, you can't say that Maher wasn't arguing for Cheney's death, and say that Coulter was calling Edwards a faggot. True, Maher used the word "die" instead of "killed" and Coulter didn't explicitly say "He is a faggot," but come on, we all know what they were saying.

"Maher: "I'm just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That's a fact."

How is a this a fact?

"Maher said that fewer people would die if Cheney were dead, and that's a true statement."

What is true?

The only fact or truth here is that these words came out of the mouth of liberal cock suckn ahole.

Here is a true statement: Had democrats not lied, 3 million wouldn't have died

The only fact or truth here is that these words came out of the mouth of liberal cock suckn ahole.

Rob, there comes the time when abbreviating 'asshole' just doesn't pay, especially when prefaced by 'cock suckn'. Rather like closing the barn door after the horse got out isn't it?

Kim's headline "Bill Maher Argues for VP Cheney's Assassination" is lie. He didn't suggest -- much less argue -- in favor of Cheney's assasination; he stated that fewer people would die tomorrow if Cheney was dead.

Maher: "I'm just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That's a fact."

Hypothetical situation:

Lee Ward: "So I'm just saying that if people drive 20 mph on the freeway, more people would live."

Kim Priestap: "Lee Ward argues in favor of maximum 20 mph freeway speed limit!"

Nope. No arguing - just stating a fact. The hypothetical headline above -- which I'm sure no bloggers at Wizbang would stoop to (coff coff) is a lie.

It's a lie when right wing bloggers pull that kind of crap, and I will call them on it, and that will continue to piss off immature people like Paul. Oh well....

>First of Maher did not say "get killed in a terrorist's attack".

Sorry Barney Google... You're a liar

Posted by: Paul at June 27, 2007 03:49 PM

Great link Paul, it really backs up your argument. I can tell that you have done this before.

MeThinks Elizabeth Edwards should spend less time worrying about what a political pundit has to say and far more time figuring out why her empty suit husband is a thief who steals cash from a charity meant to aid the poor.

So now we have Lee confirmed as a LIAR!!!!! and Barney confirmed as a LIAR!!!!!

Anyone else wanna step up?

Man Coulter is just bitter knowing that she is rapidly pushing age 50 and she knows she will die alone and childless. She has serious self loathing issues, most likely going back to childhood. Did Daddy never hug her? Or maybe Daddy hugger her a little too much?

What man in their right mind would want to spend the rest of their life with that creature, let alone reproduce? There's some desperate men out there but they ain't that desperate. No wonder Mannie has been engaged three times, but the men always leave her.

Elizabeth smacked down that elongated botoxed tranny just like she needed to be. Edwards was calm and rational, and Man Coulter just became more unhinged and resorts to spouting more personal smears, because that's all she can do. She's a one trick trick.

She's all yours, people.

What Ann Coulter is saying is that next time if she wants to not get attacked from the left, she should just say that Edwards should be killed in a terrorist attack. Because that is what leftwinger Bill Maher said about Cheney and he got a PASS from the liberal MSM. So therefore it must be OKAY to say that, according to the MSM.

She made a great point. And smart people get it and know it.

I think the author of this post is actually Ann Coulter in man drag- who the hell knows what she/he/it really is anyway? By the way Paul, I mean Ann. what you write is really pretty stupid. Thankfully, we only see you occasionally and then you usually spend most of your time hurling poo at Lee (to the point of having an obsession about it) who calls you on your nonsense.

The media is too stupid to realize they've just been pwned.

No - they are experienced enough to know with certainty that they can lie to the public with impunity. They have the megaphone, they can say what they want. All the new media combined won't make much of a dent in their desired narrative. You know I'm right.

That was a good post, Paul.(Wuv them Wegs!)

And yes, cancer-person/campaign operative Mrs Edwards makes Coulter look justified in her political swordplay (re: the live pity-ploy on Hardball by Concerned-Angry Wife (vid?); there's obviously a sum-advantage scoresheet being kept somewhere that all sides of the partisan show biz establishment refer to. At ratings time? In hell? Dunno.

The Bush-sympathetic post cannot cover the undertaste of Republican woes under the incompetent W, though. Hailing a mis-managed war as Bush's high-water mark??? (Remember: Coulter rehearses her answers in front a mirror!)

PS: I'm a Republican, but give FDR his due: No, he didn't end the depression, but he staunched the flow of husbands, sons (and some daughters!) taking the hobo express in search of honest work (and dishonest) by distributing $12/mo. to keep families intact. Family values. And High-minded Globalist Hoover would never have done it. Wheat to Belgium, not one penny to the USA.

And would you rather eat your fried chicken at a WPA-built sandstone highway rest stop (circa. 1936, trees, pond, built to last, still there), or a poured concrete eyesore of a rest stop from the Eisenhower administration (that probably fell down 10 years after it was built?) Me too!

Again: Coulter: wuv them wegs!

"Anyone else wanna step up?

Posted by: C-C-G"

FAIRY FIGHT! FAIRY FIGHT!

OK. So I guess I can say that Bush and Cheney should die in a terrorist attack, because Ann Coulter said it.

And I'm not lowering the discourse by doing the same thing as Ann, right? Isn't that how it works?

mantis: "Maher was saying if Cheney had been assassinated, more people would live.

Agreed.

"I don't know how people argue for things where you come from, but where I come from they point out the potential benefits."

Yes, If someone was arguing for Cheney' assassination, they would include the benefits -- a good argument would include the cost vs the benefits.

But talking about the benefits of driving slower on the freeway isn't in and of itself an argument that the speed limit should be lowered, now is it?

My statement that 'people driving 20 mph would result in fewer highway deaths' is pointing out the cause and effect of driving fast vs slow -- just as Maher's statement that if Cheney had died in an explosion and was therefore no longer in power fewer people would die on the battlefield is a cause and effect statement.

Claiming that I've advocated a 20 mph freeway speed limit just because I've pointed out the cause and effect of driving fast is bullshit. Just as it's bullshit to take Maher's cause and effect statement regarding Cheney being removed from power by death as call for his assassination. Total bullshit.

And -- as if the truth matters to anyone on this blog -- there is growing evidence that Cheney has exerted a lot more influence on policy in the White House than was previously known - and we're seeing new evidence of that all the time -- so Maher's cause and effect correlation between Cheney being no longer in power and people dying on the battle field rings truer every day.

FAIRY FIGHT! FAIRY FIGHT!

Posted by: bryanD at June 27, 2007 04:38 PM

Fairy fight? You mean John Edwards has entered the thread??!!!

lol.

Wow, Lee, you're like a weasel calling weasels on their weaseling while weaseling.

So if Kim's headline had been,

"Bill Maher States a Fact that VP Cheney's Assassination Would Save Lives"

instead of

"Bill Maher Argues for VP Cheney's Assassination"

you would have had no problem with it? Absurd.

Anyway, I think I've found the answer to all this.

Liar!

wee wee lee lee wardie from bluie just loves to get his rear kicked over here. He even kicks his own rear over at bluie as he is the only one that post comments on his own threads. snicker snort. As to the "Nose" on HBO, what in the h e double l makes him an authority on anything. All he is to me is just another loud mouth liberal with a place to spout his BS. As to AC, she laughs all the way to the bank.

I love how Sissy Matthews scolds Ann for her "chubby ankles" comment about Hillary.

This from the side who went on endlessly about Katherine Harris, Linda Tripp, and oh yes, a side who can't stop talking about Ann's adams apple.

Bwahahahahah....

You can't make this stuff up.

Paul, I knew as soon as I saw the post that the trolls would come out in force lead by Lee the Liar Tsar, and sure enough we have them all. One thing I noticed about lefties is they can't stand strong, opinionated women. Now I know why they are so sympathetic to Muslims. Burka and such. Lorie is a liar to them, Kim is a liar, Ann is a liar, Michelle is a liar, Laura is a liar. Quite telling actually. Anyway, I appreciate Ann and her guts to stand up to the morons. What the hell is Cuomo doing on a news show? Oh! Another lefty with the MSM but no bias, no. ww

Weeeeee more pointless arguements brought to mountainous heights from unimportant lows!!!! Very entertaining. Looks to me like everyone is taking everyhing out of context. I don't think Maher was out of line, he didn't wish Cheney was dead, he was stating an opinion. Not once does he say he wished he was dead. Coulter used that as a springboard for her comment, and in no way does she really wish Edwards would be killed. Again, not out of line, stating her opinion and making a point. Edward's wife reacted like, anyone would at the mentioning, joking or not, a scenario where your husband is killed. Sure, you could technically call her a liar in which case you win.... nothing. Other than pats on the back from your party constituents who think "It's devilish for THEM to say stuff, but OK for us because... [insert spun reason]". I'm sure if I said to any of you, "If you're spouse were dead..." no matter if I were agruing someone else's comment, joking, or whatever reason you'd be fairly upset. So, again, no middle ground reached, the left is evil, the right is pure and infallible, or vice versa, and then the childish name calling ensues. It doesn't change the fact that if Cheney were or were not in power, his friend would probably still be shot in the face, and for some reason that was of terrible importance to the world.

there is growing evidence that Cheney has exerted a lot more influence on policy in the White House than was previously known

Just can't let go of it, can you, Lee?

Guess what... Veeps aren't just for taking donations from Buddhist monks. They're for helping to set policy.

Or did you really expect that if John Edwards was elected Veep that he'd be spending all his time getting his hair done? (Well, with him, that's actually a possibility...)

No wonder Jo likes Man Coulter so much, she's has lots in common like being hopelessly single, barren and unable to get a mate.

Thank god for small miracles

I gotta hand it to you Paul, this is the most entertaining thread I've seen in a while. There's so many levels of comedy present here, both deliberate and intentional.

And once again, I've managed to comment in a thread numerous times without ever actually addressing the subject.

Hey Aria go look in a mirror and report back (truefuly) what you see.

I see bryanD escaped again. Has anyone ever figured what he says? But we need to give him time as he is enrolled in a 10 year class to learn how to melt steel.

Better still, mantis:

"Don't discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel."
-- Homer Simpson

Wow, mantis, you must've had to change your shorts after getting that lame post in first. I bet that was the best sex you've had since your right hand last night. A little suggestion to intensify your pleasure next time: call her "Mann Coulter" or "Ann the mann."

wildwillie:

Pretrty fun ny that your comment is a rant about lefties and lying rightwing shrills, errr women. Did you notice that in your first sentence you called someone a liar? "Quite telling actually." Nah, that would never occur to someone like you.

"you would have had no problem with it? Absurd.".

No, I'd have no problem with Kim telling the truth vs Kim lying. That's correct.

Hey Aria go look in a mirror and report back (truefuly) what you see.

Hmmm, truefuly? Is that anything like truthiness?

Truthfully may have been the word you were groping for, little boy. Let me know when you need an adult to help your remedial reading and writing skills, mmmkay sweetie?

I LOVE Ann Coulter.

I've NEVER disagreed with her.

Elizabeth Edwards has made some wild and low blow accusations. What a faker to pretend she's this mild mannered lady instead of some bitch that's fine with her husband getting rich off of channeling the baby saying things like "Dr. I need to get out, I'm suffering" (this was really done in the courtroom) -- Edwards (John) made claims that doctors did not perform C-sections in cases like these and then made millions.

By the way, the C-section rate in the U.S. is astronomically higher than 95% of the countries. It is one of the things that causes defensive medicine by obstetricians, and also drives up the malpractice insurance rates so high for these physicians. That didn't get mentioned in Sicko.

Silky Pony: Ann Coulter Was Mean to Me, Now Give me Money...
Pretty well sums it up. This was just a way of getting money for the Mr.

Guess what... Veeps aren't just for taking donations from Buddhist monks. They're for helping to set policy.

Bwhahahahahahhahahaha.....

BEST LINE OF THE DAY!!!

By the way, that comment by Ann about invading their countries, killing their leaders, and converting everyone to Christianity?

So what's the delay?

Jason,

Shouldn't you be jerkin' it to the Left Behind video game? Kill those virtual sinners, Christian warrior!

In all my born days I never thought I would live to see anything like I read here today. Mantis, a lefty, a somewhat reasonable articulate one, posting truth for Lee the liar Ward to read. As Mantis has no doubt learn, what we here have known all along is that truth is not relevant to Lee Ward. Lee only uses part of things he thinks bolsters his faulty arguements. Why he was given a blog, I will never understand. It is not somehing that has enhances Wizbang. I visited Blew twice and both times had to comment how infantile they were. What Lee and the other leftists here have not realized is that by their foolingly falling into the thoughtful trap Ann set for them. The issue of what Maher said about Cheney is getting more coverage. What boobs.

"Wow, I wrote that? That's pretty cool, and I still stand by it. Maher's words were specific --"

And taken out of context to make it sound more benign. Just as you continue to take Coulter's words out of context to make them sound more malignant.

Lee, your MO is so transparent it's simply astounding that you think others will fall for it. (Well, it does seem that you have successfully pulled Barney in, hook, line and sinker. But, well hey - it's Barney)

Bill Maher said what he said in defense of those who were saying that they wished Cheney had been killed in a terrorist attack that had occurred in Afghanistan at the time he was there. There's your context. Or is "context" a completely foreign concept to you?

Jim, for once, said something completely agreeable. However, he said it with the accusation that Maher's words are being used by some here to justify Coulter's. Not true. The complaint, and I'll say this as plainly as possible, is that one is covered extensively by the press while the other is ignored. It's a double standard.

What Lee is saying here, trying to claim that it's just random facts with emotional detachment, is truly an abomination.

Saying if Cheney was killed by terrorists, more people would live is okay just as a factual, non-emotional, non argumentative consideration (per Lee).

Well, if tonight (within the next few hours), Mrs. Lee Ward were to get gang raped by a gang of five guys, she may have some vaginal bleeding from a tear from the intercourse trauma.

Just a factual statement, right?

Now that we've gone back and forth about Maher and included the actual quotes of what he said and didn't say about Cheney, it's easy to see how Coulter 'lied' (lol) in order to set up her "argument" (lol) that Edwards should be killed by terrorists - hat tip: mantis.

Coulter:

"About the same time Bill Maher said... but about the same time Bill Maher was not joking in saying he wished Dick Cheney had been killed by a terrorist attack.

Um- so I've learned my lesson...

If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot,"

Coulter lies about what Maher said, claiming that 'Maher wished Cheney had been killed' when in fact reading the transcripts provided here on this comment thread you can see that he did not say that...

... and then she used that lie to give her license to say that about Edwards - the same way right wing bloggers lie then use that lie as a license to spew their bullshit.

Thanks again, Paul, for the opportunity to bring these lies to light. I am looking forward to your next post!

Guess what... Veeps aren't just for taking donations from Buddhist monks. They're for helping to set policy.

Bwhahahahahahhahahaha.....

BEST LINE OF THE DAY!!!

Thank you, Jo. Once in a while I come up with a good one.

JFO, as a typical leftie, you missed the point. Lee the Liar Tsar is a title bestowed on Lee because he sees a lie in everything.

Also, It is telling to me that Elizebeth Edwards has to fight for Johnny. What a dynamo. ww

Reading through this thread, I think I've found the money quote:

One thing I noticed about lefties is they can't stand strong, opinionated women. WW

Ann Coulter just made several million dollars by bitch slapping Edwards momma. Must be his momma since she's defending a grown man, in body he's grown, the brain is evidently still a work in progress.

Can the democrats get any more foolish or childish? The democrat posters on here prove there is more supidity they have yet to shovel into. Oh, is that sewage instead of stupidity. My wrong, you shouldn't bash those born brain dead or what the PC call developmentally disabled instead of retarded. Different terms, same results.

WildWillie:

Far from missing the point I nailed your skinny right wing ass - hypocrisy is the byword for you folks. Next time try reading what you reflexively puke up before posting it.

As for strong, opinionated women (the comment by willie) - yeah we lefties just hate Hillary. Hugh, you're a boob (no pun intended).

hypocrisy is the byword for you folks.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiight. That's why you led the fight to get DeLay out of congress once he was charged but leave William Jefferson, the guy with the $90,000 in bribe money in his freezer, in there.

Jfo

yeah we lefties just hate Hillary. Hugh, you're a boob (no pun intended).

You know, you're right. I should have qualified WW's post add another set of adjectives that would have better made my point:

One thing I noticed about lefties is they can't stand strong, opinionated smart, brilliant women.

HughS

You tried I'll give you that - but really really lame. You may hate her but you can't deny her smarts and her brilliance.

You may hate her but you can't deny her smarts and her brilliance.

Absolutely, JFO... you can't deny Ann's smarts and her brilliance. Thanks for agreeing with us!

Of course, I can't say I approve of her way of making her points sometimes, but then that's because I am a Christian and a gentleman... but she does get the point across, I gotta give her that.

C-C-G

Ann is smart snd brilliant. So were Hilter and Stalin - the 3 of them have that and other things in common. They were/are nasty and nuts.

What did Elizabeth Edwards say that was a lie?
-------------------------------------------------
I think Mrs. Edwards is a hypocrite for her statement. Her own hushband lowered the political discourse when he brazenly tried to use Mary Cheney as a fodder for his attack when he debated Cheney.

Ann is smart snd brilliant. So were Hilter and Stalin - the 3 of them have that and other things in common. They were/are nasty and nuts.
-------------------------------------------------
Can we put Hillary in that pool as well? She was mean enough to trash any woman who dared to bring her husband 's sexual adventures to light.

And Elizabeth Edwards is a crybaby, wanting people to stop attacking her husband... and John Edwards is a wuss, letting his wife defend him.

Thus is the state of the modern left. Don't stand up and fight, sit down and whine!

Jfo

Relative to the other candidates in the field, I will question her smarts and brilliance. She got elected to the Senate from New York. What else?

Ann is smart snd brilliant. So were Hilter and Stalin...you just don't know when to zip it do you?

What I'm trying to say is, my husband and his party should be able to denigrate anyone they want, but to have that reversed is just beyond the pale.

We lefties can dish out, but we can't take it. Please keep that in mind. And don't mess with my husband's hair. He works all day on it.

Editor's note: This comment and another were posted by "jo," playing sock puppet. Don't do that around here, jo -- it tends to get people banned.

Jfo, why don't you jump back in the cess pool you crawled out of. If you like nailing skinny asses, I suggest you visit San Francisco. They like your kind there. You know no truth, are incapable of logic and lie like Lee. I'll bet you have a pinup of Hillary in your bedroom to which you abuse yourself regularly.

Don't hate me because I'm ignorant.

Editor's note: This comment and another were posted by "jo," playing sock puppet. Don't do that around here, jo -- it tends to get people banned.

Don't hate me because I'm ignorant.

Posted by: JFO at June 27, 2007 07:05 PM

Oh, I don't.

I just wish you'd quit spreading your ignorance around here.

Jfo

She got elected to the Senate from New York. What else?

Step up and explain; enough with the diversion.

If you can compare someone with the 20th century's most prolific murderers, you can step up for a Presidential candidate (about whom you said I hate ,which is a lie...I never said that.)

Bunch of losers on this site. Warp and twist. Yes you have it right, republicans are ALWAYS right because they are instantly brilliant once joining the republican party. And democrats are always wrong. Yep.... Thats all you idiots ever really argue about anyway. This site is hopeless.

Paul

I apologise in advance for changing some of the subject here, but see below some of Lee's venting on Blue. I agree, a shot of chlorine will help clean things up.

Larkin recommended that readers sign a Draft Gore petition.

Al Gore would be my choice hands down for President in 2008. He is by far the most experienced and qualified candidate from either side of the aisle. He served as Vice President for 8 years after a long career in the Senate. He is eloquent, intelligent, passionate and relentless. He is a proven winner having garnered a plurality of the popular votes in three successive elections (1992, 1996, and 2000); the first two as Vice President and the last as President.

I replied that I did so and would encourage other conservative friends to do same.

Below in the comments was Lee Ward's reply:

Larkin
I signed the petition and will encourage all of my conservative friends to do so.
Posted by HughS | June 27, 2007 6:27 PM

Be sure to help them with the spelling, Hugh. Some of the street names are three syllables! That could be quite a barrier for conservatives to overcome.
Posted by Lee Ward | June 27, 2007 6:31 PM

I'll do that Lee...just after I finish spell checking everything you've written on Wizbang.
Lee, why do you imply and otherwise state so explicitly that conservatives are illiterate?
Posted by HughS | June 27, 2007 7:31 PM

Lee, Blue is forever too.

Bunch of losers on this site. Warp and twist. Yes you have it right, republicans are ALWAYS right because they are instantly brilliant once joining the republican party. And democrats are always wrong. Yep.... Thats all you idiots ever really argue about anyway. This site is hopeless. Posted by: J Taylor at June 27, 2007 07:37 PM

Why not make some sense first.

Yes...embrace Ann Coulter as your Voice...
Please embrace her views...after all she speaks for you...
after all none of you have lost a child to an accidental death....and have someone who does not know you give their opinion on your response....
....by they way ...recently Queen has repudiated our President.

Just yesterday, Coulter had turned on President Bush, at least part way.

"I do sort of get the sense now that there is -- you know -- people reaching across the partisan divide, the country is unified," she told Chris Cuomo on Good Morning America. "Bush really is a uniter because we're all just waiting for this nincompoop to be gone. I think we all finally are on the same page on that."

soo...do you all agree with Queen Ann and her opinion of Bush? ...or do you pick and choose?
Ya all believe our President to be a "nincompoop"?
...if ya do at least I respect your consistency...if not...
http://icasualties.org/oif/

Nogo

or do you pick and choose?

Well, hell yes I pick and choose. Only a dolt would march lockstep.

Do you pick and choose nogo?

A very simple analysis ..Do people consider Ann Coulter to be cynical comedian or a learned brave intelligent voice for your frustrations?
I have seen Jay...Lorie..DB and others start a thread with more knowledge and support than AC ever has..
oh yes...that liberal media that would never give a platform for AC or Glen Beck...oh wait it has...
....again...I want your American Idol "voices" to have greater exposure outside FOX...
after all when have they ever been wrong?

...by the way...how is that list of kick ass Republican Candidates doing?
You all trashed Cindy Sheehan...but Ann C. is the real deal....just wondering how many of you bought her latest book? I bought my copy for $4.99...
I read it...because I felt it was inappropriate for me to comment on it without doing so...
I sold it for 50 cents at a flea market last week..
...if you want to buy any Coulter book for a buck or less...go to ebay...and search Ann Coulter book...

Rumor is down here on Palm Beach that they wish Ann the Man would simply pack up and go back north. Her fellow repukes are embarassed by her foul mouth, being proper socialites and all you know. They avoid her on the island like the plague.

Sure she would play well in the swamps though.

"Edwards: You wrote a column a couple years ago which made fun of the moment of Charlie Dean's death, and suggested that my husband had a bumper sticker on the back of his car that said ask me about my dead son. This is not legitimate political dialogue.

Coulter: That's now three years ago --

Edwards: It debases political dialogue. It drives people away from the process. We can't have a debate about issues if you're using this kind of language."

Now...as you are aware...a few years ago Ann C.. made comments suggesting a bumper sticker exploiting the accidental death of his son...
What Elizabeth Edward did was call Coulter out on this...
it is probable that because Coulter does not have children...has never married...does not even date....she may not understand how personal is is when anyone suffers the premature death of a son or daughter...
But I am assuming that some of you are married..or dating...maybe even have kids...(by the way why isn't a babe like Ann even dating?)
if so....I would hope you would agree that Coulter's remarks concerning the death of the Edwards child is like us believing we can call for more sacrifice in Iraq...when neither we nor our children are involved...
...and we are above that right?

Nogo

Were you answering this question?
...do you all agree with Queen Ann and her opinion of Bush? ...or do you pick and choose

I told you, I pick and choose.

Who are you marching lock step with? That you refuse to, fail to or do not understand the question is informing. What is the color of your shirt?

civil behavior

Rumor is down here on Palm Beach that they wish Ann the Man would simply pack up and go back north. Her fellow repukes

Well, that's informative. Enquiring minds want to know.

Well, hell yes I pick and choose. Only a dolt would march lockstep.

Me too. See, I belong to a party where you're allowed to have different opinions without being tossed out of the party.

For examples of how the Party of the Donkey treat those in their party whose opinion differs from those of the leadership, see Miller, Zell; and Lieberman, Joseph.

The latest from WizBlue, Lee accuses conservatives of bad spelling but calls his own spell checkers "punks".

Lee said,

Thanks, glad to have you around, HughS. You're a great American, despite what most people say about conservatives like yourself... punks who are so willing to stoop to intimidation like you have here.... Oohh, you're going to spell check my posts? Wow -- you rock on you big, bad conservative kook.

I personally think that the attention you are giving us will result in you making a much better informed decision when it comes time to vote in November 2008. You'll thank us for it.

No, I take that back. Slobs like you have no manners.

Posted by Lee Ward | June 27, 2007 9:23 PM

Posted on June 27, 2007 21:23
__________________________________________

HughS:
Lee

"punks who are so willing to stoop to intimidation like you have here."

and

"Be sure to help them with the spelling, Hugh. Some of the street names are three syllables! That could be quite a barrier for conservatives to overcome."

Lee, who is doing the intimidating here? You issued a challenge. I'm good for it. You seem to regret it, particularly in calling me "punk".

You sound nervous. Bring on the attacks, I'll bring the facts. Live it and own it, Lee.

Posted by HughS | June 27, 2007 10:05 PM

Posted on June 27, 2007 22:05

Post a comment
If you have a TypeKey identity, you can sign in to use it here.

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Remember personal info?

Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)

Hugh,

Actually it's meant to send out an S.O.S. for Annie that any of the right wing posters here might want to invite her to their town. She would fit right in with them as she sticks out like a sore thumb even amongst those who normally would fall at her feet because eof her wealth, illbegotten as it is. She is much more common than the airs she puts on down here.

She'd fit in quite nicely in the swamps of the right wing Wiz pot. Got room?

And here's my latest reply, HughS - I'll save you the trouble, you pathetic putz.

Lee said,

So go help your conservative friends sign up at the draft Gore site, like you said you were going to do -- then come back and post the number of friends who did so.

I mean, you weren't lying when you said you were going to do that, right? I'd be shocked to find out a conservative lied on a blog comment thread.

When you're finished with that, archive our site, spell check my posts, and then report back. I'll give you some new chores when you've completed these.

Posted by Lee Ward | June 27, 2007 10:17 PM
------------

Ahh, good old Lee. Demonstrating what a lefty means by "rational discourse."

TO ARIA: seems you got the idea tho -what did you see.
As to "boy", I was retired before the monkey had that "twinkle" in his eye that produced what out to be a pimple-faced nerd such as you.
Ever figured out what you saw in the mirror?

I signed the Draft Gore petition. I'd really love him to be the democrat nominee for President. After all, he, along with Breck Boy, are known losers.

All the above exchange between HughS and leeward is an example of why leeward is a supercilious pr*ck.

Man, whining to somebody who already doesn't respect you? And having your WIFE do it because you lack the guts to do it yourself?

Man I love Ann.
-=Mike

You've got it bad, bD. Poured Eisenhower concrete, forsooth.

Do you have any Aria's not full noted hatred?
============================

And having your WIFE do it because you lack the guts to do it yourself?

Breck Boy was probably busy getting his hair done, or getting a spa treatment, or a pedicure. Something important like that, you know.

Civil, would that be the Palm Beach area that can't even vote correctly?

By all means, let's listen to people who can't fill out a butterfly ballot correctly.

I'm all for drafting Al Gore.

That would be the easiest election for the GOP to win in history, no doubt about it.

Run Al run!!!

"All the above exchange between HughS and leeward is an example of why leeward is a supercilious pr*ck."

No, I'm a superDUPERcilious pr*ck!

Liars!

Geez mantis, I wasn't even on this thread, why are you calling me a liar.

You're the liar.

No, I'm a superDUPERcilious pr*ck!

Posted by: Lee Ward at June 28, 2007 01:16 AM

See, I said the wizblues socialists were narcissist.

Lee the Liar Tsar again can't wait to call someone a liar. It is pathological. Lee, you have become a punchline. Sorry guy, no one takes you serious anymore. Try another name or even better, a new site.

JFO, get a clue. Ann is a private citizen and can speak her mind how she likes. If we like it, we do, if we don't we don't. John Wayne Gacy, the Chicago mass murderer, was a strong democrat supporter. So I guess you are for mass murder, because one of your own was. ww

nogo postal:

I'm confused. Are we lock-stepping to our Republican overlords, or not? That fact that you're the only one who brought up Coulter's Bush-is-a-nincompoop statement seems to put the lie to the never-ending charges here of conservatives marching lock-step to the Republican mantra.

It seems that no one here is upset that Ann Coulter out and out called Bush a nincompoop. Neither conservatives or liberals. Could it be that we think she's entitled to her opinion? Nah, couldn't be, could it?

But let a liberal call one of their saintly liberal politicians a name like that and you guys would come out with both barrels blazing against them. Purity above all else, eh? Remind me again now of how liberals are sooooo tolerant....

Instead, liberals have their panties in a wad because another statement she made, taken out of context, made them cry. Wah!

Hey, is civil behaviour revealing that he voted for Bush in 2000?
=======================================

To all the have-nots on the Wiz train....here's a clue. Ann Coulter is a misfit. She tries hard to fit in with the Palm Beach socialities by ranting about wedgies they hold as the convincing arguments for all the fundies out there in Wiz land. That way they get their cake and eat yours too. In all ways she is a less than a commoner, in most educated areas she is more akin to street trash. Something unnecessary and increasingly irrelevant, to be thrown into the trash.

Of course she subscribes to her own ego thinking she is being accepted by the rich and famous all the while they are shunning her. It's a hoot. And all the wizzers keep tithing to her.

By the way Jo, I said Palm Beach Island not Palm Beach county, big difference, of course too subtle to escape your all inclusive repuke fantasy. These wealthy icons would sooner spit on you than include you in their club. But they love your ever so loyal idolatry. Fat oxy boy included. Lot's of wanna be's like the Wiz crowd who support these frauds keep them where they are and where you are. Laughable antics while being wizzed on.

P.S. Kim, not in my lifetime

wildwillie;

The sad sad thing is you do like what she says. That speaks volumes for you and others like you.

By the way I'll defend to the end her right to say it. Kinda like we defend the rights of skinheads and neo-nazis to say the same kind of stuff she says.

May I propose a new theme song for Mr. Ward?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxrd_jZJxkg

By the way I'll defend to the end her right to say it. Kinda like we defend the rights of skinheads and neo-nazis to say the same kind of stuff she says.

Ahh, so you agree that Mrs. Edwards was wrong to try to silence Ann by whining about it, because Ann has the right to say whatever she wishes?

Why are right wingers all crazy? When did your personality disorders start? When did logic and reason become so hostile to your way of life? When did Rob start licking rear ends? enquiring minds want to know.

ccg:

That's a pretty stupid statement and question,. You folks love to try that tricky little gotcha question Hannity uses - which of course makes him look more idiotic than he already is. Try being original next time.

To answer your foolish question- no I don't agree she was wrong. See, there's a difference between a right protected by the Constitution and the exercise of common decency, of which the shrew Coulter has none. I know it's hard for you wingnuts to accept that we actually have first amendment rights which Mrs Edwards was in no way abridging. Take a civics class and stop aping that fool Hannity.

Eliz Edward is more brazen than I thought and the the left was more dishonest in this event than I thought.

Back in 2005, people pointed out that the Edwards used their son 's death as prop.
http://www.sayanythingblog.com/entry/edwards_using_sons_death_as_political_tool/

And now they used it again for fund-raising. And this is a setup between Chris Matthews and Mrs. Edwars. The liberals seem to be willing to stoop to any level to push their agenda. ANd how can they be so cheap to make this stunt for fund?

http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/g/ff6999d8-b7d1-4178-af6e-bf4e3f9f01aa

When Ann Coulter appeared on the ABC program, GOOD MORNING AMERICA this week on June 25, and stated:"If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish that he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot", she deserves to be attacked by the wife of John Edwards.

ABC and HUMAN EVENTS have no business giving a political platform to anyone like Coulter who even jokes about such a serious event as terrorism on American soil impacting our high profile Americans. This is a dangerous taboo that our society should not break down because it will only invite terrorism and violence in the future if it is not seen as a seriously wrong taboo. Our society doesn't need to cross this line.

Chris Matthews was so dishonest that he allowed Mrs. Edwards to call in without giving the number to the public. If he wanted a debate between Mrs. Edwards and Ms. Coulter, set it up as such.

Mrs. Edwards was both hypocritical and cheap for exploiting the death of her son for political fund-raising. While pretending to be outraged by people calling her out on the brazen attempt to exploit the death of their son, her husband was willing to stoop so low to use Cheney 's daughter as a prop for his attack.

The fact that the progressive left is willing to promote this behavior can be seen as seriously wrong taboo.

So Paul... what about Bill Maher? Why is Coulter subject to this serious taboo and not him?

In fact, what she said was complaining about just that. What about those who give Maher a political platform when he wasn't joking?

Anyway, your point as I understand it is one I disagree with strongly. Serious matters should be joked about, particularly terrorism should be made fun of, the butt of any number of jokes and derisions. Nothing is proved by a somber face except your own righteousness. Plus, it's what the terrorists with their little dicks want more than anything. They want you to take them seriously, with great morose solemness and gravity. (Middle Eastern men, I'm told, I've big dicks, but that's on average. It's the little guys that go into terrorism since, as we all know, everything is about sexual inadequacy.)

Anyhow... our motto, in all seriousness, in relation to terrorism should be a variation of speaking softly and carrying a big stick. When it comes to terrorism we should wave a rubber chicken and carry a big stick.

Hit them where it hurts most. They are pathetic excuses for men and we should all watch repeated You Tube clips of that obnoxious family guy baby and Achmed the Terrorist. Laughter is the best cure for the world's ills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noznyMaVEs8

Unfortunately Achmed is gone for copyright issues. Silly Jeff Durham. I understand but I wouldn't have ever heard of him but for You Tube.

When it comes to terrorism we should wave a rubber chicken
--------------------------------------------
For the jihadists, we should wave pig skin.

I know it's hard for you wingnuts to accept that we actually have first amendment rights which Mrs Edwards was in no way abridging.

Neither was Coulter.

Or is the right to free speech limited to lefties now?

So Paul... what about Bill Maher? Why is Coulter subject to this serious taboo and not him?

In fact, what she said was complaining about just that. What about those who give Maher a political platform when he wasn't joking?

Simple, Synova. The First Amendment only applies to those with whom Mr. Hooson and jfo agree. All others should be silenced.

Mrs. Edwards lost a son and is herself dying of cancer. Yeah, now would be a great time to make a personal attack on her...

Classy...

The First Amendment only applies to those with whom Mr. Hooson and jfo agree. All others should be silenced.

You keep talking about the First Amendment and free speech as if that has anything to do with what people are saying. As far as I can see, no one has advocated the government get involved in this in any way. People express their displeasure at Coulter being given a forum, and express their opinion that the outlets providing that should not, but in no way does anyone suggest abridging her constitutional rights. ABC is not the government, and the First Amendment doesn't guarantee TV appearances. Free speech includes the right to tell other to shut up, it just doesn't allow the government to actually shut them up.

ccg

You're more of an idiot than I thought or you don't read anything. Or both. You rant about silencing Coulter. Who advocated that the government do that? Common deceny, something the shrew Coulter knows nothing about (nor you apparently) is what both mrs Edwards and I were talking about.

I'll bet you hang on every word of that crazy racist/xenophobe nut case Savage too, don't you? Come to think of it, maybe Savage and Coulter were spawned by the same person.

JFO, you're the one with reading comprehension problems.

I said earlier, and I repeat, I take issue with the way Coulter makes some of her points.

And I have never listened to nor read anything by Mr. Savage. A friend gave me a Savage book as a gift and I promptly took it to the used book store and traded it.

But don't let the facts get in the way of insulting someone who disagrees with you, JFO... you never have.

on hardball coulter said this was on of the "greatest columns ever written"..
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=10908

coulter appeals to those who are stuck in middle(junior High)school...where mocking someone in and of itself was justified...

Facts...those of you that have all of Ann's books...where are the footnotes that give even the slightest association to fact...

say Al Franken...all his books have extensive footnotes...

She passes herself off as a "comedian" ...does reading the linked article make you laugh?

She passes her observations off as just "humorous"
...if she said what she says on "Last comic standing" ...how would she do...

Yes she has a right to say whatever she wants..but to most Americans it is not funny...
But if she speaks for you...then hey...buy her books and read them to your children...

I said earlier, and I repeat, I take issue with the way Coulter makes some of her points.

Why are you trying to silence people, abridging their First Amendment rights?

Liar!

I love Ann Coulter. I read all her Townhall.com columns and forward them to my daughter.

So I guess nogo and mantis want to keep exercising their right to say "shut up" to Ann Coulter, but not to Bill Maher when he implies Cheney should be killed by terrorists. I wonder why they make the distinction (where it's bad taste in one and acceptable in the second). If it's just purely personal preference, then say you personally prefer Maher, and don't criticize Coulter.

Mrs. Edwards lost a son and is herself dying of cancer. Yeah, now would be a great time to make a personal attack on her...
------------------------------------------------
This is a typical cheap and phony arg used by the progressives to justify their less than honest tactic.

Since she lost a son, so she has the right to go out and use her son 's death as a fund-raising tool and attack other people? Noone else has the right to call her on it? LEt 's retire this cheap arg. The attack on Mary Cheney is the cheap one.

So I guess nogo and mantis want to keep exercising their right to say "shut up" to Ann Coulter, but not to Bill Maher when he implies Cheney should be killed by terrorists.

I don't tell her to shut up, I ignore her completely. And Maher. I find them both idiotic and unfunny.

Carry on.

A few here don't seem to understand that using a FCC regulated medium such as the broadcasting airwaves to imply that harm should happen to someone like both Coulter and Maher have both done may even constitute a federal crime besides being a stupid thing to do.

The first Amendment protects a lot of objectionable things, but not threats made over public airwaves or otherwise, and provisions of the Patriot Act probably could be appplied to Coulter's or Maher's loose talk as well.

Coulter narrowly avoided a possible arrest for voter fraud last year and a felony arrest when she was under investigation. If Coulter keeps up her crazy reckless talk encouraging terrorists to strike public figures she'll be in handcuffs before very long. Coulter just doesn't seem to be intelligent enough to avoid trouble. You don't hear other political figures talk like her.

You,re dreaming, Paul.

Mr. Hooson, you're contradicting yourself.

The first two paragraphs of your post, you talk about Coulter and Maher both.

Yet in the last paragraph you say "You don't hear other political figures talk like her [Coulter]." But you just spoke about Maher's comments as well!

This is what liberalism does to the mind, alas...

Lol - what a pathetic putz! This is classic - thanks for the laugh, Hugh - we need more "public service announcements". This is priceless -- bookmarked! lol

Thanks Lee,
I really appreciate it....except the putz part because spellcheck had a problem with "putz", so I scored that neutral (I guess that means moderate?)
Maybe you can put up a permanent link on Wizblue for conservatives who have trouble with those three syllable words. That would be an in kind reply to my PSA.
Best of luck to you Lee!

Before one comments on another's spelling, one should be sure one can spell oneself.

I imagine Lee still hasn't learned that lesson, though.

Good news Lee,

Two misspellings since last Wednesday. Bad news: they reflect a poor understanding of the plural noun and the possessive .

I was discussing your prolific mistakes in the Comments section of WizBlue and Wizbang with my kids' elementary school principal and she suggested you concentrate on contractions. Flash cards are very effective.

Flash cards are very effective.

Just make sure the words on the flash cards are spelled correctly. In other words, don't write them out yourself, ask any 5-year-old to do it for you.

The fetid puss that oozes from the Mann Cunter quim is the stuff of which the Wizbang commenters and most Repulicans are made.

The fetid puss that oozes from the Mann Cunter quim is the stuff of which the Wizbang commenters and most Repulicans are made.

Uhh, you do realize that by leaving that comment, you are now a "Wizbang commenter" and thus you're describing yourself?

I didn't think you did.

And Ann Coulter looks downright classy in comparison.

Which takes some doing.

"You don't hear other political figures talk like her."

Are you HIGH? Compared to any wide eyed finger pointing delusional democrat , Ann Coulter may as well be a nun.

Were it not for quim
You would still be in.
=============

Paul Hooson is busy blaming all of terrorism on Ann over at Wizblue. What a Stalinist. He says it here too, at 6:09 PM, the 28th.
=========================