I am now getting to the part which will be the most controversial, and yet also likely to get the least interest. However, since I set up the table, it's time to show how the Presidents play. After today, I will be releasing scores of the match-ups, but only at Stolen Thunder.
The contests will be Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday through the year until each President has played his 146 games. Here are the match-ups for Monday, April 3:
Eisenhower at Washington
Ford at John Adams
Pierce at Jefferson
Arthur at Madison
Cleveland at Monroe
Nixon at J Q Adams
Carter at Jackson
LBJ at Van Buren
McKinley at W Harrison
GHW Bush at Tyler
Teddy Roosevelt at Polk
B Harrison at Taylor
Hoover at Fillmore
George W Bush at Buchanan
Coolidge at Lincoln
JFK at Andrew Johnson
Clinton at Grant
Wilson at Hayes
Truman at Garfield
Harding at Taft
Reagan at FDR
In each match-up, the dominant conditions are established by the term of the "home" President. For each of our five responsibilities, there is a first-to-last ranking of scores, with 5 points possible down to 1. The top priority gets no less than 3, and the bottom no more than 3, and so on, with no more than two 5's or 1's allotted.
For each area of responsibility, there is a prime concern, worth triple value, two areas of "important" value, worth twice value, and two areas worth normal value. The rest is basic math, and the higher value wins that individual match-up.



Comments (7)
So how do I vote for myself... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Bill Clinton | April 1, 2007 8:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So how do I vote for myself?
1. Posted by Bill Clinton | April 1, 2007 8:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 1, 2007 20:07
2. Posted by Jimmah | April 1, 2007 8:25 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I still say this is unfay-ah. All this use of facts, what about how people feel?
2. Posted by Jimmah | April 1, 2007 8:25 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 1, 2007 20:25
3. Posted by Beth | April 1, 2007 8:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Bush FTW!!!
3. Posted by Beth | April 1, 2007 8:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 1, 2007 20:47
4. Posted by bryanD | April 1, 2007 9:46 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What's the point?
4. Posted by bryanD | April 1, 2007 9:46 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 1, 2007 21:46
5. Posted by G W Bush | April 1, 2007 10:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Got wood?
5. Posted by G W Bush | April 1, 2007 10:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 1, 2007 22:07
6. Posted by hnav | April 1, 2007 11:05 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
mighty fine Mr. D !
fascinating...
6. Posted by hnav | April 1, 2007 11:05 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 1, 2007 23:05
7. Posted by DJ Drummond | April 2, 2007 9:23 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Even though I have explained the concept in detail over a number of posts, Bryan, I am not surprised that you fail to grasp the method or its purpose.
7. Posted by DJ Drummond | April 2, 2007 9:23 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 2, 2007 09:23