The 53rd edition of the Wizbang Podcast is up for your listening pleasure. Here's what I thought you'd like to hear about today:
- Mark Steyn on the Islamic Demographic Threat
- Ted Kennedy's Stake in the Ground: off the deep end
- Hillary's position: Firmly in the middle - but Bush is still wrong
- President Bush: Firmly against human sacrifice
- Killing the Viet Nam analogy
Note: Even if you don't use iTunes, a podcatcher, or any other fancy tech gizmo's, if you have speakers on your computer you can listen to a streaming version of the show via the Hipcast control at the top of the story.



Comments (12)
C'mon Charlie, you complete... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Lee | January 19, 2007 10:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
C'mon Charlie, you completely overlooked this story, the top story of the day.
The Democrats are back!
1. Posted by Lee | January 19, 2007 10:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2007 22:56
2. Posted by Diane | January 19, 2007 11:22 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Charlie, Jay, DJ, Lorie, Paul, Kevin, Jim, Kim, et.al do not have to share the news of Bob Ney, the number of dead soldiers in Iraq, etc. to their readers. These stories are fully covered, and covered, and covered by the major networks & major rags daily, hourly, sometimes every few minutes.
Most WIZBANG readers like myself, come to this site to find the news and the links/sources of such news the mainstream media chooses not to share with the public.
I do not have the time to come here or to liberal blogs to argue with people who are not going to change their minds on most political issues, any more than I will change my mind. In checking this site, usually once a day, I have not found the postings of Lee, jp2, nogopostal, hugh, etc. to have altered the opinions of the authors of this blog, (nor many of its regular readers) even once.
Is there not more constructive things one can do with one's time than constantly ranting at the authors of blogs--i.e., tutor a child; volunteer to keep some single mom's kids why she works; teach English to an immigrant; collect food for the poor; work a second job & pay for someone's medicine or electric bill, etc. etc.
2. Posted by Diane | January 19, 2007 11:22 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2007 23:22
3. Posted by marc | January 20, 2007 1:51 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
But the "real story" is how did you land a Editor-in-Chief position at Wizbang? It must be so considering you attempt to dictate what is written here on so many occasions.
That is an Editor-in-Chief's role correct? So what's the pay Lee? What does Kevin think you're worth?
I mean as Editor-in-Chief, not as useful tool that can be counted on in dragging the topic away from the topic.
NOTE to Kevin: I'm totally shocked Lee scored this position after not having enough courage to submit a post during the Holiday LEFTEST FREE-FOR-ALL.
3. Posted by marc | January 20, 2007 1:51 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 01:51
4. Posted by snowballs | January 20, 2007 2:23 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Top story of the day Lee?
A former Republican..
..accepted golf and gambling trips, tickets to sporting events, free meals and campaign donations arranged by Abramoff and his associates.
Holy Shit! Stop the podcasts! Thank goodness that there's no such lobbying for Democrats, right? Minus the operative word "Abramoff", right? And that Democrats are immune to such a temptation? Gimme a fuckin' break already.
Top story my ass. Get your own blog so no one will read it, or better yet, start your own radio scrub that might get listened to and won't be able to garner advertising dollars in a fair manner.
/chickenhawk argument
Again, please, Kevin, will you format the comments section here where the persons posting have their handle at the top of the comment - easing our ability to grab the scrollbar and move on.
On a serious note - the only worthy left leaning commenter here has not written a 'Wizbang Blue' article, and that's too bad. You know who you are.
4. Posted by snowballs | January 20, 2007 2:23 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 02:23
5. Posted by snowballs | January 20, 2007 4:19 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
1) on Mark Steyn;
I don't agree with the idea that more births by [x] means anything. Freedom, as defined by America's founding fathers, supersedes any primitive teachings. Simple - sure, but don't count it out, even If "youth" is at fault.
2) Ted Kennedy needs to go away. Why? Because he's a bandwagon [insert bullshit artist euphemism here] politician.
He's said that "there were no WMDs", in not so many words, as a fact - which we all know is simply an assertion, even if you believe one way or another. Hell, that argument is 4, no, 15+ years old. Massachusetts needs a better representative.
3) Hillary - actually, she's right, with the exception of the term of "redeployment". But she does talk about threats, which, for me (I'm with the hawks here) earns merit.
She actually speaks in a serious tone about Iraq, which includes the part about standing-up of the Iraqi government.
4) Who gives a fuck what 'Kos' thinks about anything? In his own words, 'Fuck em'. This message is important, particularly when Bush speaks about our economy, which is a resilient mechanism representing what we all are. BTW, none of you dems can tell me that if you agree at all with anything Kos says, his glory does not depend upon a division of America.
5) The Vietnam analagy is only used nowadays by politial figures, and our vets who were part of that era are American heroes, period. It was a different fight - and they fought proudly for our freedoms, and in my young opinoin, it was worth it. God bless them.
5. Posted by snowballs | January 20, 2007 4:19 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 04:19
6. Posted by snowballs | January 20, 2007 4:27 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sorry ^, division of America, should be linked to http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Main_Page
6. Posted by snowballs | January 20, 2007 4:27 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 04:27
7. Posted by Lee | January 20, 2007 11:07 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Here's another bit of interesting news, overlooked by Charlie in his attempt to make a nice, clean, safe place for conservatives to lie to themselves.
Sad state of affairs, when a guy has trouble getting a fair trial because they can't find enough unbiased jurors.
...but back to the really important stuff. Let's not forget a post or two about Barack Hussein Obama, because everyone knows that Barack Hussein Obama is just plain evil.
No wonder conservatives want to surround themselves with lies about Nancy Pelosi, and lies about Jamil Hussein. The reality is that the role and position of conservative Americans in our body politic today has been reduced to that of childish whiners, standing on the side of the road throwing rocks at the passing motorcade of progress.
No one speaks for you, and any thinking Republican in office today knows they have to distance themselves from you in order to save their political lives. Under these circumstances, the warm blanket of lies and misdirection provided by conservative bloggers today must be quite comforting.
7. Posted by Lee | January 20, 2007 11:07 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 11:07
8. Posted by jhow66 | January 20, 2007 11:55 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I see old "pucker puss" (lee lee) (resident turd polisher) is back and he still has his ditto key.
p'p' at least Ney dosen't "freeze" his "gifts"
Also p'p' I don't believe I saw anyone mention old "elephant ears". Tell us one "lie" that is not true about the "Tuna Lady". Yeah we like to throw rocks instead of kissing ass like you.
8. Posted by jhow66 | January 20, 2007 11:55 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 11:55
9. Posted by marc | January 20, 2007 12:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sad state of affairs, when a guy has trouble getting a fair trial because they can't find enough unbiased jurors.:: by Lee on January 20, 2007 11:07 AM
Disingenuous or flat out uncomprehending what you read Lee. Which is it?
You left out the reason why a jury is difficult to seat. Most have been tossed because of having Bush Derangement Syndrome.
Wait there's third option... despicable troll.
9. Posted by marc | January 20, 2007 12:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 12:39
10. Posted by Lee | January 20, 2007 1:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"You left out the reason why a jury is difficult to seat."
No, I didn't. It was right there in the quote.
Your "Lee Derangement Syndrome" must have blinded you to the simple english words right there on the page in front of you.
10. Posted by Lee | January 20, 2007 1:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 13:13
11. Posted by marc | January 20, 2007 5:17 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Your "Lee Derangement Syndrome" must have blinded you to the simple english words right there on the page in front of you.
:: by Lee on January 20, 2007 1:13 PM
Just a prime example of how unimportant the vast majority of your comments are.
They are now worth reading to the end.
11. Posted by marc | January 20, 2007 5:17 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 17:17
12. Posted by Lee | January 20, 2007 6:48 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Just a prime example of how unimportant the vast majority of your comments are."
"They are now worth reading to the end."
The part of my comment you highlighted appeared after the relevant quote you missed -- so it had nothing to do with reading to the end.
You using your mouth as a shovel, Marc, must be awfully tiring, but keep digging if you wish. A few more lies and mindless attacks and you'll be promoted to junior cadet troll, and jhow66 will take you under his wing,
12. Posted by Lee | January 20, 2007 6:48 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2007 18:48