The vote for the House Minority Leadership is taking place tomorrow. I sat in as many blogger conference calls as I could with the candidates, and after listening to them and their strategies on to win back the majority in 2008, I have made my decisions about who I think the House Republicans should vote for:
House Minority Leader: Congressman Mike Pence - He is articulate, passionate, and a conservative in the Ronald Reagan model of low taxes, small, unobtrusive government, and a strong defense. He knows how important it is to return to that model if we are going to win back the House in 2008.
House Minority Whip: Congressman John Shadegg - Congressman Shadegg is also a Ronald Reagan conservative. He and Congressman Pence will make a great team.
House Republican Conference Chairman: Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn - A Ronald Reagan conservative like Congressmen Pence and Shadegg, I like how Congresswoman Blackburn began the conference call by explaining how her experiences in sales & marketing and business ownership prior to her coming to Congress will serve her well in this position. Rather than starting off with the canned speech of how we need to get back to our conservative roots, which we definitely need to do, she got right down to business to communicate the information we needed about her qualifications. And communication is what this position is about.
As I side note, I really liked Congressman Dan Lungren as well. He communicated his vision for the future of the Republican Party succinctly and passionately.
These are the three people I think are best qualified to lead the House Republicans.



Comments (4)
"Congressman Mike Pence - H... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Larkin | November 16, 2006 10:22 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Congressman Mike Pence - He is articulate, passionate, and a conservative in the Ronald Reagan model of low taxes, small, unobtrusive government,"
So, do you mean the kind of conservative who would not support federal government intervention in the private medical matters between a husband and wife that had already been contested and settled by a state court system (i.e, Schiavo)?
1. Posted by Larkin | November 16, 2006 10:22 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 16, 2006 22:22
2. Posted by Mitchell | November 16, 2006 10:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It would be refreshing to see the GOP go back to our roots, and have forthright conservatives in charge.
I am tired of the competition to see who can out earmark the Dims. We need to quit being coy, and come out of the closet.
I am not an animal, I am a Conservative~!
2. Posted by Mitchell | November 16, 2006 10:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 16, 2006 22:23
3. Posted by ryan | November 17, 2006 12:36 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
it sounds to me like you want ronald reagan back, since you listed all of these people as reagan conservatives.
getting beyond the usual generalities of "low taxes, smaller government, and a strong defence," what is it about reagan conservativism that you agree with or are most interested in???
really. just asking.
3. Posted by ryan | November 17, 2006 12:36 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 17, 2006 00:36
4. Posted by Jim Addison | November 17, 2006 2:43 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hey, give us lower taxes, smaller government, and a strong defense and security policy, and there isn't so much else we'll argue about, really.
4. Posted by Jim Addison | November 17, 2006 2:43 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 17, 2006 02:43