Yes, this is tasteless gossip, but it is also at least as well substantiated as many of Keith Olbermann's reports on MSNBC. For those who can stomach it, a woman claiming to be a "conquest" of Olbermann is kissing and telling.
« Everything I needed to know about the Foley scandal I learned from the Democratic talking points | Main | Is North Korea Preparing Another Nuke Test? »
Yes, this is tasteless gossip, but it is also at least as well substantiated as many of Keith Olbermann's reports on MSNBC. For those who can stomach it, a woman claiming to be a "conquest" of Olbermann is kissing and telling.
Send e-mail tips to us:
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
Section Editor: Maggie Whitton
Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert
Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port
In Memorium: HughS
All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.
Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361
Hosting by ServInt
Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.
Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.
Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.
Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.
Comments (23)
What do you expect? He is ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Gianni | October 9, 2006 8:50 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What do you expect? He is a liar w/o passion on the air, hateful too, so this doesnt surprise me.
watch him claim she is a stalker....
1. Posted by Gianni | October 9, 2006 8:50 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 08:50
2. Posted by muirgeo | October 9, 2006 9:15 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well when some one like Olbermann slams you and the treasonous leaders you continue to support your best bet is the old fashion republican smear campaign.
I was able to read that NY Post article...are you able to sit and listen to him gut your the President and his leadership? Are you able to watch it and comment with valid counterpoints or does he beat the crud out of your position to such a degree that this is ALL you can do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mH7zaxAGMWk&mode=related&search=
2. Posted by muirgeo | October 9, 2006 9:15 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 09:15
3. Posted by Lorie Byrd | October 9, 2006 9:21 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
From the "reports" I have seen Olbermann do on Bush and other Republicans, there is no response needed because they are ridiculous and any truth in them is contorted beyond recognition. When he does report anything straight, if he does, it gets no attention from me due to all his wacko conspiracy theory reporting. He has so destroyed any credibility that something silly like this is is all he merits.
3. Posted by Lorie Byrd | October 9, 2006 9:21 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 09:21
4. Posted by VagaBond | October 9, 2006 9:32 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'll bet she is Olbermann's "Worst Person" tonight.
4. Posted by VagaBond | October 9, 2006 9:32 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 09:32
5. Posted by jhow66 | October 9, 2006 9:49 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hey "mun-go" (linkman) I bet you sent old "lardhair" money so he could help buy the O'Reilly "tapes".He he
5. Posted by jhow66 | October 9, 2006 9:49 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 09:49
6. Posted by Mark Blahut | October 9, 2006 9:57 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Miss Lorie,
How about a post on the CONDI, Tenet Meeting ?
I will bet you will avoid that story .
You seem to enjoy writing about lies.
Its time to start with the truth .
Your post today shows how dumb you are .
Thanks for nothing today , I will look for more
nothing from you tomorrow . Wizbang should get
someone else to fill your spot .
6. Posted by Mark Blahut | October 9, 2006 9:57 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 09:57
7. Posted by RobLACa. | October 9, 2006 10:04 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hey mark, shut up stupid. Take your sniveling lying butt elsewhere. Why do the MINORITY LOSERS who "ARE" Complete lying frauds always call others liars and cry like babies while demanding they step down or be replaced? Go cry and lie somewhere else baby.
7. Posted by RobLACa. | October 9, 2006 10:04 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 10:04
8. Posted by Gabe | October 9, 2006 10:13 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hmmm. She 'strikes' up an email relationship. Cuz she admires him, NOT becasue he is a famous guy on TV that she does not actually know from Adam. Then flys herself to NY to meet him a hotel. Where she proceeds to have sex with him withan hour of meeting for the first time. And then she is SHOCKED when he treats her like a tramp. Wow..who could of seen that coming!! Oh and now she says the sex was no good and he was a cad, but she is UPSET when he says he does not want to see her again.
But she WILL blog about it. Because when you have NO self respect or class you may as well let the WHOLE world know.
8. Posted by Gabe | October 9, 2006 10:13 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 10:13
9. Posted by eddiebear | October 9, 2006 10:15 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I guess part of the glee some are seeing in this is that The Man Who Ran From a Tide Sample has for years hammered conservatives for their foibles. In fact, he routinely cracks on Bill O'Reilly as "Mr. Falafel" and rips on Rush's various legal, medical and marital issues.
Also, since the NYP is owned by Fox News' parent company, I get the feeling that since FNC won't mention his name on their shows, they are outsourcing some of their dirty work to a newspaper's gossip page.
9. Posted by eddiebear | October 9, 2006 10:15 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 10:15
10. Posted by VagaBond | October 9, 2006 10:19 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hey Mark...the village called. They want their idiot back.
10. Posted by VagaBond | October 9, 2006 10:19 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 10:19
11. Posted by USMC Pilot | October 9, 2006 10:25 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Got to come down on "Gabe's" side on this one. Act like a whore, you get treated like a whore. Sounds like a bunch of sour grapes to me. Olbermann might be the biggest sleaze on earth, but this womans credibility is wanting.
11. Posted by USMC Pilot | October 9, 2006 10:25 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 10:25
12. Posted by LibraryLady | October 9, 2006 10:30 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
WHAT!! I always assumed he was gay!
Well, after reading of this encounter, maybe he is.
12. Posted by LibraryLady | October 9, 2006 10:30 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 10:30
13. Posted by Lee | October 9, 2006 2:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Nice to see you're not afraid to get your hands dirty, Lorie.
It shows a lot of desperation, to stoop this low to try to discredit the mainstream media, but I'm glad you're not "above the fray" or holding yourself to any false higher standard.
Answer me this, Lori. If the same anonymous rumors had surfaced regarding a conservative Fox News anchor, would you have published it?
13. Posted by Lee | October 9, 2006 2:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 14:57
14. Posted by Lorie Byrd | October 9, 2006 3:27 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
No, Lee. Olbermann gets special treatment because he engages in the nastiest form of mischaracterizations and reporting of lunatic conspiracy theories and tries to pass them off as news. I don't see that on Fox, or hardly anywhere else for that matter. Olbermann stands head and shoulders above the others on that front. Had you read my post, you would already know that though. I made clear there that the only reason I was even passing it on is because that is in keeping with Olbermann's standard of "news." Okay, I didn't say it in those exact words, but I expect most who actually read the post got it.
14. Posted by Lorie Byrd | October 9, 2006 3:27 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 15:27
15. Posted by Lorie Byrd | October 9, 2006 3:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Gabe -- I agree about the woman. Anyone who would admire Olbermann is messed up to begin with.
15. Posted by Lorie Byrd | October 9, 2006 3:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 15:30
16. Posted by KobeClan | October 9, 2006 3:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hey, muirego,
Interesting point. Do you have a graph to support your opinion?
16. Posted by KobeClan | October 9, 2006 3:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 15:39
17. Posted by Mitchell | October 9, 2006 5:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
His "conquests" are more Edward Murrow-like than he is. Anybody is.
Hell, my dog is.
17. Posted by Mitchell | October 9, 2006 5:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 17:26
18. Posted by Half Canadian | October 9, 2006 6:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Given Olbermann's ratings, isn't it misleading to refer to him as 'mainstream'? There are blogs that have higher viewership than he does.
18. Posted by Half Canadian | October 9, 2006 6:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 18:08
19. Posted by muirgeo | October 9, 2006 6:27 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hey, muirego,
Interesting point. Do you have a graph to support your opinion?
Posted by: KobeClan
Yeah I got a graph but I don't have it in a form I can upload or link to. But this is it in a nutshell.
I plotted out how stupid you seem on the x-axis (call that variable X) against how stupid you look on the y-axis (call that variable Y)and found that its a linear relation expressed by the following simple equation;
X=Y
19. Posted by muirgeo | October 9, 2006 6:27 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 18:27
20. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | October 9, 2006 8:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Muirego, did your parents have any normal children? I just wondered because you are an idiot.
20. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | October 9, 2006 8:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 20:08
21. Posted by Mitchell | October 9, 2006 9:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
No, Mungo's parents were Collies, but they had a bunch of yappy little terriers.
21. Posted by Mitchell | October 9, 2006 9:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 21:00
22. Posted by James Cloninger | October 9, 2006 10:49 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Keith who?
Did he IM her and asked if she was wearing shorts?
Where's Hasert? I demand an investigation!
22. Posted by James Cloninger | October 9, 2006 10:49 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 22:49
23. Posted by jp2 | October 9, 2006 11:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Lee: Lorie isn't stooping - this is her level. Name calling or publishing silly kiss and tell rumors - she'll do whatever it takes.
23. Posted by jp2 | October 9, 2006 11:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 9, 2006 23:06