The Detroit Free Press is reporting:
Federal counterterrorism agents raided a Muslim charity in Southfield on Monday morning, according to the FBI.
Agents with the FBI and Joint Terrorism Task Force executed search warrants at the headquarters for Life for Relief and Development, a Southfield-based charity that works in Arab and Muslim countries around the world.The warrants were based on a criminal predicate, said William Kowalski, assistant special agent in charge for the Detroit office of the FBI. The affidavits in support of the warrants are sealed, he said.
At about 9 a.m., agents raided the Southfield office, hauling away documents, letters and ledgers, said Dawud Walid, head of the Michigan branch of the Council on American Islamic Relations. Agents told officials with the charity that the raid was related to some sort of criminal activity, Walid said.
The charity has worked in Iraq, Pakistan and the Palestinian territories, among other countries.
According to its Web site, the charity "has provided over $50 million in humanitarian assistance to more than 13 million beneficiaries worldwide."
It was founded in 1992 to help people in Iraq.
Debbie Schlussel says it's the largest Muslim charity in the US:
LIFE--the largest Islamic charity still open for business in America--openly admitted on its 1995-'97 taxes to be a major funder of HAMAS. Headquartered in the Orthodox Jewish suburban Detroit subdivision in which I grew up, it gave millions to Human Appeal International, which the FBI identified as HAMAS' Jordanian operation. It has done many vague "Katrina," "Lebanon Relief," and "Afghanistan Wheelchair" fundraisers and believed to have laundered the money to terrorists. Its founding resident agent is tied to Al-Qaeda, and one of its former employees Abdel-Jabbar Hamdan is also tied to terrorists. The government has been trying to deport him.
Hat tip: LGF



Comments (28)
Why are you quoting Debbie ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Sandra | September 18, 2006 4:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Why are you quoting Debbie Schlussel? She makes Ann Coulter look like Howard Zinn.
1. Posted by Sandra | September 18, 2006 4:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 16:09
2. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 4:20 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Amazing often terror elerts are elevated and big busts are made close to election time isn't it? Oh what a cynic I am! Just a coincidence I'm sure.
2. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 4:20 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 16:20
3. Posted by plainslow | September 18, 2006 4:27 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
“has provided over $50 million in humanitarian assistance to more than 13 million beneficiaries worldwide.”
Wow, $3.85 each. bet it helped
3. Posted by plainslow | September 18, 2006 4:27 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 16:27
4. Posted by VagaBond | September 18, 2006 4:35 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
They should have bought lottery tickets instead....
4. Posted by VagaBond | September 18, 2006 4:35 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 16:35
5. Posted by Drew | September 18, 2006 4:35 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
At least we are taking some action...I forget, how many convictions to we have in the FBI "war against terror..
5. Posted by Drew | September 18, 2006 4:35 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 16:35
6. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 4:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm just surprised they didn't reprise John (There Shall Be No Naked Marble Breasts On My Watch) Ashcorft to make the announcement.Did they trot out Bush's lapdog Gonzales to do it?
6. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 4:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 16:40
7. Posted by Publicus | September 18, 2006 4:45 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think it's too soon to either celebrate or chastise. We don't know anything about this yet. If the FBI did a good investigation, and found these guys funding terrorists, that's great! If it turns out to be a paranoid or opportunitistic move against innocents based on faulty or lazy police work, then that's bad.
To both sides, left and right, I suggest: let's not be knee-jerk. Let's wait and get the facts.
7. Posted by Publicus | September 18, 2006 4:45 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 16:45
8. Posted by sam | September 18, 2006 5:19 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hugh,
Sorry that Clinton's lap-dancer Janet Reno was not available. She was busy fire-bombng Americans in Waco, and cornering Elian Gonzales in a closet at 4 am. No time for Osama, no sir. Have to have priorities right.
8. Posted by sam | September 18, 2006 5:19 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 17:19
9. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 5:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Seems to me she was enforcing the "rule of law" you righties so worship. But then we knew you'd get Bill Clinton in here sooner or later...err I mean sooner. Yes, I know Bill Clinton is responsible for every single bad thing that has ever happened....even before he was born.
9. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 5:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 17:26
10. Posted by sam | September 18, 2006 5:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Rule of law" to Bill Clinton, just as to all you lefties/commies, is a suggestion to be followed as long as it is convenient to your dmented fantasies. (BTW, I was waiting to see how long it took for the traitors to bring up Ashcroft.)
10. Posted by sam | September 18, 2006 5:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 17:50
11. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 5:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
To those of you to the center of the right:
You have folks like Sam on your side and you call lefties unhinged? It was only me Sam, take my citizenship.
11. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 5:58 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 17:58
12. Posted by Robert | September 18, 2006 6:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
sam,
Giving shit to Reno for cracking down on illegal immigration?
I need to get an updated scorecard. Can't tell the players and teams without one.
12. Posted by Robert | September 18, 2006 6:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 18:10
13. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | September 18, 2006 7:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hugh, you have nerve calling anyone unhinged. So Janet Reno was just enforcing law. Is that why all those kids died in a fire. Is that how you enforce gun laws? What about that killing in Idaho? You worship on your knees in front of a man who violated most ot the rules of decency, finding no fault with him, yet you blame all the ills of the world on G.W.Bush. If Clinton had done the job of President, Bush's job would have been much easier. I wonder how good you are at praying toward Mecca five times daily.
13. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | September 18, 2006 7:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 19:10
14. Posted by Clay | September 18, 2006 7:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I will have to agree with Hugh that former-President Clinton did a much better job of enforcing immigration law than President Bush. Damned strange, that. And my major source of contention.
I bet Clinton's got Bush beat in the blowjob department, too. At least from women not his wife. Of course, I'll never forgive his treatment of a perfectly fine cigar...Well, okay, maybe if she was better looking. Or not as fat. Or without that stupid beret.
Dang. I'd have perjured myself rather than face the truth, too. I'd swear to God that I didn't touch her. Who can blame him? I sure don't. Not for that.
14. Posted by Clay | September 18, 2006 7:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 19:39
15. Posted by Clay | September 18, 2006 7:42 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
By the way, I was talking about the cigar.
15. Posted by Clay | September 18, 2006 7:42 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 19:42
16. Posted by Synova | September 18, 2006 7:49 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hopefully we get more information about this bust.
I know I shouldn't but I do wonder if Hugh could give us a time frame when he'd find arrests related to terrorism acceptable?
16. Posted by Synova | September 18, 2006 7:49 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 19:49
17. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 9:54 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Synova:
Good question. I'd say six months before and I wouldn't be the cynic I can't help being. But then Mr Bush et al would have no political interest in arrests like these or terror warnings would they?
Just so interesing how the famous Bush Fear Factor card is now coming into play once again. Aw gee, how could I think such a thing.
17. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 9:54 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 21:54
18. Posted by Synova | September 18, 2006 10:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So terror related arrests should be halted for six months before elections?
Every two years?
18. Posted by Synova | September 18, 2006 10:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 22:31
19. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 10:35 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Synova:
That'a a silly question and you know it. I said I would not be as cynical about them. Or the terror alerst that just so happen to be frequently tied to things not going so well for the Boy Emperor.
19. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 10:35 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 22:35
20. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 10:36 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Synova:
That'a a silly question and you know it. I said I would not be as cynical about them. Or the terror alerst that just so happen to be frequently tied to things not going so well for the Boy Emperor.
20. Posted by Hugh | September 18, 2006 10:36 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 22:36
21. Posted by Synova | September 18, 2006 10:49 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
That's the problem with slipping away into conspiracy, Hugh. You believe that the Bush administration would *manufacture* terror related arrests, so unless something can't *possibly* be counted to their favor, you're skeptical.
Good for Republicans or Bush = must be a lie.
Bad for Republicans or Bush or something that can not possibly be seen as vindication of their policies = true.
So what other than "timing" do you use to judge if a report is true or not?
Strange way of determining truth you've got.
21. Posted by Synova | September 18, 2006 10:49 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 18, 2006 22:49
22. Posted by jhow66 | September 19, 2006 12:25 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hey hugie guess who your PRESIDENT is for 2 more years. Poor little whiney assholes like you just can't stand the thought that Bush kicked your whimpy ass not once but TWICE. Oh I know he "stole" both of them (tsk tsk)but look who he won over--the biggest tree hugger on the planet (in size and scope both) and the biggest "war hero" of the Vietnam war(the one that tooks his R&R at Xmas in Cambodia. Could you tell us again how your present President stole them both? It will do everyone good to hear this so we can do it again in 2008. Thanks.
22. Posted by jhow66 | September 19, 2006 12:25 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 19, 2006 00:25
23. Posted by Scraprion | September 19, 2006 12:41 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
While the FBI is arresting terrorists why don't they arrest the terrorists leader from Iran? He's going to be available real soon. I'm sure some of the folks that spent 444 days in the hell hole of Iran will be more than happy to file criminal charges against him.
23. Posted by Scraprion | September 19, 2006 12:41 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 19, 2006 00:41
24. Posted by Hugh | September 19, 2006 6:13 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Synova:
Look up the definition of cyncism will ya. I don't doubt the truth of the arrests....I doubt the timing. That being said, we do have a rather shaky history of the reality of the crimesI.e. those bad boys in Chicago who didn't even have enough bus fare to go to wherever they were going to commit their "terrorist" acts.
Same with the alerts,,,the timing.
Remember, cynicism. It's not the truth, it's the timing. Neither you nor I nor any member of the public knows the "truth."
As for you Scrapiron, don't forget your angry pills.
24. Posted by Hugh | September 19, 2006 6:13 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 19, 2006 06:13
25. Posted by Les Nessman | September 19, 2006 3:46 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Cynical and whiny, that's our Hughie.
He'd be cynical if the terrorism arrests occur within 6 months of an election; but he'd be whining that we aren't doing enough if there were NO arrests in the 6 months leading up to an election.
I guess some people will slam Bush no matter what he does. How childish. How unsuprising.
25. Posted by Les Nessman | September 19, 2006 3:46 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 19, 2006 15:46
26. Posted by Hugh | September 19, 2006 4:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Les:
When i read something like you just wrote a picture, or rather a movie, comes to mind. I see you in that movie, say an 18th century piece. You wear a whig, have a pasty face and are a member of the royal court. You wave a hanky under your nose so you don't have to smell the unwashed masses. It appalls you to even be near them.
If you took the effort to read what folks post on this site you'd see that I always talk about being distrustful of the government. I distrusted the Clinton government as I do the Bush government and as I will the next government. I think the founders intended it to be that way and I agree with them.
Next time try not dissuasively waving your hankie and try to learn where people stand on issues.
Maybe you should try to inspire yourself to learn. That wouldn't be childish would it?
26. Posted by Hugh | September 19, 2006 4:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 19, 2006 16:13
27. Posted by Les Nessman | September 19, 2006 6:42 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I wear a Whig? I wear Daniel Webster?
What kind of movies do you watch?
Hugh, how long has the FBI been watching this group?
There's a difference between healthy distrust of the gov't and conspiracy theory madness.
27. Posted by Les Nessman | September 19, 2006 6:42 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 19, 2006 18:42
28. Posted by Hugh | September 19, 2006 10:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Les:
I completely agree with your last sentence.
H
P.S. I think you kinda liked the idea of your character didn't ya?
28. Posted by Hugh | September 19, 2006 10:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 19, 2006 22:00