Bury them in paperwork...
Permalink | Linking Blogs | Sphere: Related Content | Digg this! | FARK It!
Filed under:
Dumbasses
« Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups | Main | CIA Leak Case - No News Is Still News »
How To Stamp Out Porn?
TrackBack
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How To Stamp Out Porn?:
» Isaac Schrödinger linked with Here They Come to Save the Day!
Advertisements
Search
Follow Wizbang
Contact
Send e-mail tips to us:
Subscribe Via E-Mail
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
Fresh Links
The Wizbang® Network
Credits
Section Editor: Maggie Whitton
Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert
Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port
In Memorium: HughS
All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.
Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361
Hosting by ServInt
Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.
Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.
Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.
Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.
Comments (10)
Ton and tons of paper work ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by spurwing plover | October 12, 2005 2:37 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Ton and tons of paper work to bury dirty minded men like LARRY FLINT and HUGH HEFNER so much paperwork they will smother uner it
1. Posted by spurwing plover | October 12, 2005 2:37 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 12, 2005 14:37
2. Posted by Faith+1 | October 12, 2005 2:46 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Umm, yeah cause Larry and Hef know nothing about paper...being magazines publishers and all...
2. Posted by Faith+1 | October 12, 2005 2:46 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 12, 2005 14:46
3. Posted by bullwinkle | October 12, 2005 3:22 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Gee, they might be forced to finally hire some lawyers.
3. Posted by bullwinkle | October 12, 2005 3:22 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 12, 2005 15:22
4. Posted by ed | October 12, 2005 4:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hmmm.
My solution would be for very attractive women to be required, by law, to walk around naked except for high heels, lace teddys and g-string.
Would I get your vote?
4. Posted by ed | October 12, 2005 4:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 12, 2005 16:09
5. Posted by Alnot | October 12, 2005 4:37 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
If I remember right a popular porn actreess admitted to lying about her age when she first started. Making a lot of her movies child porn. It keeps me away from watching any of that stuff. I would not want to go to jail for watching something that later turned out to be child porn. Kinda off topic but yes you can legally drive drug dealers and pornographers out of your community using several different tactics.Why not take it up a notch?
5. Posted by Alnot | October 12, 2005 4:37 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 12, 2005 16:37
6. Posted by Mikey | October 12, 2005 4:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Death by a thousand papercuts. Fiendish, but effective.
6. Posted by Mikey | October 12, 2005 4:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 12, 2005 16:39
7. Posted by RightWingLiberal | October 12, 2005 4:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
God is the greatest artist indeed. Nothing wrong with appreciating that. IMO :)
7. Posted by RightWingLiberal | October 12, 2005 4:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 12, 2005 16:50
8. Posted by Rightwingsparkle | October 12, 2005 4:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Kevin,
Why did you file this under "dumbasses?" Do you think it is a BAD idea?
8. Posted by Rightwingsparkle | October 12, 2005 4:58 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 12, 2005 16:58
9. Posted by Faith+1 | October 12, 2005 7:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I would think it belongs under "dumbass" ideas because it a) does nothing to stop porn and b) becomes another regulatory problem for non-porn stuff. As the article said a harmless TV show showing a married couple in bed would be in the same boat as "Debbie Does Dallas".
If you are trying to stamp out something like a porn magazine the last thing you want to try is more beuracratic paperwork that they are already experts at...they've been doing it for years....it's only the non-porn stuff that hasn't and now has too.
It's like saying the way to stop lawyers from being corrupt is to have every person--lawyers or not--file legal briefs before doing anything...guess who is already good at that?
9. Posted by Faith+1 | October 12, 2005 7:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 12, 2005 19:50
10. Posted by Ken | October 13, 2005 1:14 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"If I remember right a popular porn actreess admitted to lying about her age when she first started. Making a lot of her movies child porn. It keeps me away from watching any of that stuff. I would not want to go to jail for watching something that later turned out to be child porn."
Has anyone ever been prosecuted for watching a show that they had reasonable cause to believe wasn't child porn? That would be extremely effed up.
10. Posted by Ken | October 13, 2005 1:14 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 13, 2005 13:14