A poll taken by the Int'l Republican Institute? Is that the pollster of the Moonie Times?

No such publication, Clive Tolson. Perhaps you should consider turning off the moonbattery and turning on the intelligence.

Freedom of Religion is sure a handicap to liberal dogma, no doubt about it.

A new source is comprised of writers and editors and a publisher, or a few of those latter ones. A funding source is only as corruptible as it is liberal. Perhaps you've spent too much time familiarizing yourself with the George Soros and Media Matters method of guerilla 'journalism' such that you assume others manipulate information in media as does the left.

I'm curious where in The Washington Times you've ever found anything that condones, supports, prosetylatizes a certain religious faith? Just curious, a lot of us would find your evidence interesting.

You folks from the Right certainly get defensive and literal when backed into a corner!!

-S-, I've never used such dismissive terms as 'moonbattery' to describe you, yet have taken even worse from you in return. My pointed comments have obviously angered you in the past, only to get insults in response.

Suffice it to say, Media Matters.org serves as an effective and credible threat to exposing the lies of the Right.

The Washington Times is nothing but a joke.

The NY Times are in the business of telling its readers what they want to hear, which is that the war in Iraq accomplished nothing and our soldiers who have died there have died for nothing. They owe it to their readers to stay on message, no matter how far off into an alternate reality of pure propaganda they are forced to venture. It's important for folks like Clive to be able to read it and then declare, "See! The authorities say I'm right!"

Suffice it to say, Media Matters.org serves as an effective and credible threat to exposing the lies of the Right.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHHH!!!

Oh Come on Clive--- Admit it... You're really Ann Coulter stiring shit.

Claiming conservatives are "backed into a corner" and that mediamorons.org is "effective and credible?"

You are either a rightwinger mocking the left or you are 12 years old.

"I've never used such dismissive terms"

uh....

"The Washington Times is nothing but a joke."

'scuse me while I scratch my head at your hypocrisy.

Clive says: Suffice it to say, Media Matters.org serves as an effective and credible threat to exposing the lies of the Right.

Media Matters.org is neither effective nor credible, except at amplifying the moonbat frequencies you people operate on.

One day you guys will wake up and realize the dangers inherent in feeding on your own propaganda. Till then, well, I've got plenty of popcorn. Please continue!

Nice try at manipulating my words Henry!! What I actually wrote:

-S-, I've never used such dismissive terms as 'moonbattery' to describe you

And, evidence of such bile expressed here by the mere mention of Media Matters.org, only confirms how successful their efforts at exposing the lies of the Conservative Media have been!

Yet, knowing that MMFA does release the occasional correction, I'm confident that none of you will ever rise to the challenge of proving any offered example as wrong!