A show spokeswoman commenting on tonights episode about a married TV show host and author who espouses family values and recently settled a sexual harassment lawsuit with a female producer who says she's got audio tapes of him hitting on her. The spokeswoman must be referring to the fact that on Law & Order the show host takes a bullet to the head. [New York Daily News]
It's a liberal wish-fulfillment show, kind of like a show where a terrorist named Ogama fin Raden blows up a building and gets shot in the head would be for a conservative.
Just different values I guess.
1. Posted by
TallDave | February 9, 2005 10:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I have to ditto what TallDave just said. That said, what do you folks think about the --new-- Cosby show? Here is my two-cents worth: He is being (or has been) "O'Reilly'ed".
Not that I'm a fan of the latter Bill or his proclivities, but I think its fairly certain among most that said proclivities were known and that the bait therefore was rather easily set by those who wanted to take him down.
So now, we're going to analyze all television programming for "bias" or what might be perceived as such? It's a freaking television show, and if you don't like it, don't watch. I think if everyone thought that the freaking fictional (or "ripped from the headlines and altered to fit a one hour story") television programs out right now were biased one way or another, they should go out, start their own network, and shoot the liberals on the show instead.
I didn't see anyone complaining when the Dana Delaney character tried to kill a "liberal" talk show host whose program resembled Howard Stern's earlier this season - after he was "blamed" for having the Delaney character's son rape a television star - is that wrong, too? Guess shooting that character was just a "liberal wish fulfillment," too.
3. Posted by
Tom | February 10, 2005 9:40 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I saw that, it made me quite angry because it didn't even advance the storyline by having the Bill O'Reilly character in there. Had they based the character on my life it would not have changed the show one iota. It was basically an excuse to take as many shots as possible at O'Reilly.
4. Posted by
tim | February 10, 2005 12:44 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Plenty of people have criticised O'Reilly, they just didn't do it in a format in which they can launch emotional screeds with no chance to address them. Additionaly there was more than one characterization of the positions he has taken that was a strawman at best. Had these "criticisms" been laid out in a commentary or other written work they would have been ignored as a joke.
5. Posted by
tim | February 10, 2005 3:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
LOL You don't have to look very hard at TV and Hollywood to find liberal bias. Just ask Kelsey Grammer. It's easier to "come out of the closet" as gay than Republican.
7. Posted by
TallDave | February 11, 2005 4:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
Fresh Links
The Wizbang® Network
Credits
Section Editor: Maggie Whitton
Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert
Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port
Comments (7)
It's a liberal wish-fulfill... (Below threshold)1. Posted by TallDave | February 9, 2005 10:43 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It's a liberal wish-fulfillment show, kind of like a show where a terrorist named Ogama fin Raden blows up a building and gets shot in the head would be for a conservative.
Just different values I guess.
1. Posted by TallDave | February 9, 2005 10:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 9, 2005 22:43
2. Posted by m a r t i n @ b l o g b a t | February 10, 2005 1:17 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I have to ditto what TallDave just said. That said, what do you folks think about the --new-- Cosby show? Here is my two-cents worth: He is being (or has been) "O'Reilly'ed".
Not that I'm a fan of the latter Bill or his proclivities, but I think its fairly certain among most that said proclivities were known and that the bait therefore was rather easily set by those who wanted to take him down.
2. Posted by m a r t i n @ b l o g b a t | February 10, 2005 1:17 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 10, 2005 01:17
3. Posted by Tom | February 10, 2005 9:40 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So now, we're going to analyze all television programming for "bias" or what might be perceived as such? It's a freaking television show, and if you don't like it, don't watch. I think if everyone thought that the freaking fictional (or "ripped from the headlines and altered to fit a one hour story") television programs out right now were biased one way or another, they should go out, start their own network, and shoot the liberals on the show instead.
I didn't see anyone complaining when the Dana Delaney character tried to kill a "liberal" talk show host whose program resembled Howard Stern's earlier this season - after he was "blamed" for having the Delaney character's son rape a television star - is that wrong, too? Guess shooting that character was just a "liberal wish fulfillment," too.
3. Posted by Tom | February 10, 2005 9:40 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 10, 2005 09:40
4. Posted by tim | February 10, 2005 12:44 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I saw that, it made me quite angry because it didn't even advance the storyline by having the Bill O'Reilly character in there. Had they based the character on my life it would not have changed the show one iota. It was basically an excuse to take as many shots as possible at O'Reilly.
4. Posted by tim | February 10, 2005 12:44 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 10, 2005 12:44
5. Posted by tim | February 10, 2005 3:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Plenty of people have criticised O'Reilly, they just didn't do it in a format in which they can launch emotional screeds with no chance to address them. Additionaly there was more than one characterization of the positions he has taken that was a strawman at best. Had these "criticisms" been laid out in a commentary or other written work they would have been ignored as a joke.
5. Posted by tim | February 10, 2005 3:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 10, 2005 15:41
6. Posted by Raina | February 10, 2005 5:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This is hardly the first time Law & Order has been biased against conservative values...
http://www.aclearvoice.org/archives/2005/02/bias_on_law_ord_1.php
Their writers show all the understanding of conservative policies of your typical 19 year old college liberal.
6. Posted by Raina | February 10, 2005 5:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 10, 2005 17:56
7. Posted by TallDave | February 11, 2005 4:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Tom,
LOL You don't have to look very hard at TV and Hollywood to find liberal bias. Just ask Kelsey Grammer. It's easier to "come out of the closet" as gay than Republican.
7. Posted by TallDave | February 11, 2005 4:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 11, 2005 16:31