This is interesting. The story will lend credence to the theory that the forged documents were transcriptions of handwritten notes Killian had written. "Lucy Ramirez" will be able to claim that she was afraid of retribution from the "powerful" Bush family and so used an alias.

Terry McAuliffe must have gotten a wet spot in his shorts when he thought this one up.

On the other hand, a correspondence file implies that the documents are typewritten. Hmmm. If she actually has access Killian's file there are some interesting questions:

1) did she work in Killian's office?
2) why did she take the file and hold onto it for 2 decades?
3) how many state, federal, and military laws has she broken?
4) why did she feel that the risk of performing illegal activity was worth the possible consequences?
5) is the woman Rather interviewed last week (I forget her name) really Ramirez? We know she hates Bush enough to do something like this.

The plot thickens.

And, you know what? Who cares? This whole affair keeps Kerry marginilized and a sideshow. At the time he needs to be re-re-re-introducing himself to America, the MSM is going to be doing what it can to slime Bush, and will be ignoring the goofy one.

I do wonder if someone at the DNC, or even Rather himself, saw some type of documents they considered to be incriminating, and figured they could protect the source by faking the memos. I do find it hard to believe that even Dan Rather is stupid or whacked out enough to claim what he did and put his reputation at risk for photocopies that he knew he couldn't be verified.

I think it's possible someone is hiding something that they think will sink Bush. I also think that whatever it is they have, while a Bush killer in their minds, will amount to a bunch of nothing.

Congrats, bloggers. You did bring about the downfall of See-BS and that idiot Rather. Enjoy. Celebrate. You deserve it.

But . . . The most horrible thing about the MSM is their self-worship since Watergate. They never shut up about it. In fact, now those idiots name every single scandal something-gate. To paraphrase Jim Carrey - you can tell how big a loser someone is by how far back in time they have to go to be a hero - "You remember when I was a sperm? I outswam all those other sperm!! "

Don't go down that road, bloggers. In spite of how sweet this victory is - you need to let it pass and move on.

You are better than the MSM. Sure, it will be appropriate to keep an eye on the See-BS link to the Kerry campaign. But more importantly, keep your eye on the ball or this story will be your Watergate.

Please bloggers, John Kerry is such an asshole that it is truly important not to get bogged down with the long-overdue fall of Dickless Dan.

This story still has legs. Now we need to uncover: "what did Dan Rather know and when did he know it?" Did he know that his producer was calling the Kerry campaign's Joe Lockhart? And what about using Ben Barnes -- his comrade in Texas politics -- as a major source

And the mainstream media will have to be prodded to dig further.

Looks like the MSM dam has broken. Now some reporter will be trying to become this generation's Woodruf and Bernstein by nailing Kerry. Let's hope lots are.

So from what I just read you think that someone who has seizures is a liar? That is an interesting leap.

Spaz: I don't think you should try to decide for yourself if Burkett is lying- you seem to have trouble absorbing more than 1 detail at a time.

I'm with Spaz on his comments. A guy who has a seizure isn't neccesarily a liar. It is a little funny to think of an anti-Bush nutjob getting all worked up and having a fit, (like John Belushi back when SNL was funny).

However, a man who's debilitated shouldn't be mocked because of is disability. I doubt that's what anyone meant.

Tim McNabb
fivehundredwords.com

Lucy Ramirez = second gunman on the knoll?

they're both in Texas, right?

I'm on the phone with my sleazebag lawyer, he tells me to fake a seizure, don't say anything until we can re-group later in the day......

Credible? Unimpeachable? You betcha! All hat, no cattle.

Speaking of "All hat, no cattle", what kid of cattle does George raise on his "ranch". If you ain't raising livestock and your're just growing plants, that ain't a ranch, it's a farm.