Richard Leiby, the new voice of the Washington Post's Reliable Source gossip column debuts with a strong piece on how the U.S. Park Police failed their "dirty bomb" test Sept. 11, 2003.
Click to enlarge.
That little bag on the right was placed right up against the Washington Monument. The kicker to the story is the Park Police officer nearby who appeard to be sound asleep in his unmarked vehicle.
It's definitely a trade-off we're making in terms of a laid back society versus a hypervigilant society.
I saw an unattended soft attache bag in a grocery store one week. Of course, as paranoia shidoshi, the possibility that it was a bomb set to blow in the soft target of a supermarket did cross my mind; however, I also knew that it could belong to some sales rep who was around the corner straightening the potato chips. So instead of alerting the manager, and perhaps getting the store cordoned off for a bomb threat, I let it lie. And it didn't explode.
I'd assume the parks service people operate with a similar modus operandi. They assume that the logical explanation is something other than "It's gonna blow!" and in most cases, they're right.
However, perhaps some day one will. At which point, of course, the vigilance and effectiveness will be questioned, probably too much. Fortunately, exploding bags are not so commonplace that they have become a default assumption. I hope they never do.
As such, this incident smacks of Gotchaism. There's really no difference between this "test" and the kid who smuggled boxcutters onto airlines. As long as our society remains free, we'll have more holes than strands in our safety net.
1. Posted by
Brian J | January 13, 2004 10:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
Fresh Links
The Wizbang® Network
Credits
Section Editor: Maggie Whitton
Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert
Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port
Comments (1)
It's definitely a trade-off... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Brian J | January 13, 2004 10:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It's definitely a trade-off we're making in terms of a laid back society versus a hypervigilant society.
I saw an unattended soft attache bag in a grocery store one week. Of course, as paranoia shidoshi, the possibility that it was a bomb set to blow in the soft target of a supermarket did cross my mind; however, I also knew that it could belong to some sales rep who was around the corner straightening the potato chips. So instead of alerting the manager, and perhaps getting the store cordoned off for a bomb threat, I let it lie. And it didn't explode.
I'd assume the parks service people operate with a similar modus operandi. They assume that the logical explanation is something other than "It's gonna blow!" and in most cases, they're right.
However, perhaps some day one will. At which point, of course, the vigilance and effectiveness will be questioned, probably too much. Fortunately, exploding bags are not so commonplace that they have become a default assumption. I hope they never do.
As such, this incident smacks of Gotchaism. There's really no difference between this "test" and the kid who smuggled boxcutters onto airlines. As long as our society remains free, we'll have more holes than strands in our safety net.
1. Posted by Brian J | January 13, 2004 10:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 13, 2004 22:52